You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ignite.apache.org by Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org> on 2018/02/21 23:56:48 UTC
[Apache Ignite Survey] Closed, results are attached
Igniters,
The survey is off and here is a snapshot of the results:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-2T8S87DH8/
Noteworthy observations:
- 87% of respondents are software architects and engineers. These are
the folks who help us to drive the project!
- Most of Ignite use cases are in Banks and HighTech - this is what the
consistency and in-memory speed are valued for!
- Majority of the deployments store up to 100 GB of data in up to 20
nodes clusters while 10% of deployments maintain hundreds and thousands
nodes clusters - getting ready, community!
- Ignite persistence is getting as valuable as the compute grid.
Pay attention to the last question that contains a written individual
feedback. It should guide our plans. For instance, I like this proposal:
MultiMap support like in Guava is badly needed. Hazelcast has this and is
highly used collection type, so much so this forces us to have to use
Hazelcast over Ignite sadly in many apps
--
Denis
Re: [Apache Ignite Survey] Closed, results are attached
Posted by Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>.
Oops, anyway, it's not a big deal. Let's sum them up :)
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 8:10 AM, Dmitry Pavlov <dp...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Denis,
>
> Interesting results, thank you.
>
> Unfortunately Ignite Persistence came twice in used features.
>
> And it becomes a a little bit unclear which measurement should be
> considered correct: max, min, or average.
>
> Sincerely,
> Dmitriy Pavlov
>
>
> чт, 22 февр. 2018 г. в 4:17, Dmitriy Setrakyan <ds...@apache.org>:
>
> > Very useful.
> >
> > BTW, here is the ticket for MultiMap implementation. It has a very nice
> > design proposal and looks fairly simple to implement.
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-640
> >
> > Hope someone in the community can pick it up.
> >
> > D.
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 3:56 PM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Igniters,
> > >
> > > The survey is off and here is a snapshot of the results:
> > > https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-2T8S87DH8/
> > >
> > > Noteworthy observations:
> > >
> > > - 87% of respondents are software architects and engineers. These
> are
> > > the folks who help us to drive the project!
> > >
> > >
> > > - Most of Ignite use cases are in Banks and HighTech - this is what
> > the
> > > consistency and in-memory speed are valued for!
> > >
> > >
> > > - Majority of the deployments store up to 100 GB of data in up to 20
> > > nodes clusters while 10% of deployments maintain hundreds and
> > thousands
> > > nodes clusters - getting ready, community!
> > >
> > >
> > > - Ignite persistence is getting as valuable as the compute grid.
> > >
> > > Pay attention to the last question that contains a written individual
> > > feedback. It should guide our plans. For instance, I like this
> proposal:
> > >
> > > MultiMap support like in Guava is badly needed. Hazelcast has this and
> is
> > > highly used collection type, so much so this forces us to have to use
> > > Hazelcast over Ignite sadly in many apps
> > >
> > > --
> > > Denis
> > >
> >
>
Re: [Apache Ignite Survey] Closed, results are attached
Posted by Dmitry Pavlov <dp...@gmail.com>.
Hi Denis,
Interesting results, thank you.
Unfortunately Ignite Persistence came twice in used features.
And it becomes a a little bit unclear which measurement should be
considered correct: max, min, or average.
Sincerely,
Dmitriy Pavlov
чт, 22 февр. 2018 г. в 4:17, Dmitriy Setrakyan <ds...@apache.org>:
> Very useful.
>
> BTW, here is the ticket for MultiMap implementation. It has a very nice
> design proposal and looks fairly simple to implement.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-640
>
> Hope someone in the community can pick it up.
>
> D.
>
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 3:56 PM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Igniters,
> >
> > The survey is off and here is a snapshot of the results:
> > https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-2T8S87DH8/
> >
> > Noteworthy observations:
> >
> > - 87% of respondents are software architects and engineers. These are
> > the folks who help us to drive the project!
> >
> >
> > - Most of Ignite use cases are in Banks and HighTech - this is what
> the
> > consistency and in-memory speed are valued for!
> >
> >
> > - Majority of the deployments store up to 100 GB of data in up to 20
> > nodes clusters while 10% of deployments maintain hundreds and
> thousands
> > nodes clusters - getting ready, community!
> >
> >
> > - Ignite persistence is getting as valuable as the compute grid.
> >
> > Pay attention to the last question that contains a written individual
> > feedback. It should guide our plans. For instance, I like this proposal:
> >
> > MultiMap support like in Guava is badly needed. Hazelcast has this and is
> > highly used collection type, so much so this forces us to have to use
> > Hazelcast over Ignite sadly in many apps
> >
> > --
> > Denis
> >
>
Re: [Apache Ignite Survey] Closed, results are attached
Posted by Dmitriy Setrakyan <ds...@apache.org>.
Very useful.
BTW, here is the ticket for MultiMap implementation. It has a very nice
design proposal and looks fairly simple to implement.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-640
Hope someone in the community can pick it up.
D.
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 3:56 PM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
> Igniters,
>
> The survey is off and here is a snapshot of the results:
> https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-2T8S87DH8/
>
> Noteworthy observations:
>
> - 87% of respondents are software architects and engineers. These are
> the folks who help us to drive the project!
>
>
> - Most of Ignite use cases are in Banks and HighTech - this is what the
> consistency and in-memory speed are valued for!
>
>
> - Majority of the deployments store up to 100 GB of data in up to 20
> nodes clusters while 10% of deployments maintain hundreds and thousands
> nodes clusters - getting ready, community!
>
>
> - Ignite persistence is getting as valuable as the compute grid.
>
> Pay attention to the last question that contains a written individual
> feedback. It should guide our plans. For instance, I like this proposal:
>
> MultiMap support like in Guava is badly needed. Hazelcast has this and is
> highly used collection type, so much so this forces us to have to use
> Hazelcast over Ignite sadly in many apps
>
> --
> Denis
>