OpenNLP vs StanfordNLP

[György Chityil <gy...@gmail.com>]

Hello,

Been playing with both OpenNLP and StanfordNLP (
http://nlp.stanford.edu/software/tagger.shtml), and it seems to me they
overlap on several grounds. Any plans for joining forces? :)

Cheers

-- 
Gyuri
274 44 98
06 30 5888 744

RE: OpenNLP vs StanfordNLP

[Jeyendran Balakrishnan <jp...@personaltube.com>]

Yup, here's the quote from the same URL :
"The tagger is licensed under the GNU General Public License (v2 or later).
Source is included. Source is included. The package includes components for
command-line invocation, running as a server, and a Java API. The tagger
code is dual licensed (in a similar manner to MySQL, etc.). Open source
licensing is under the full GPL, which allows many free uses. For
distributors of proprietary software, commercial licensing with a
ready-to-sign agreement is available. If you don't need a commercial
license, but would like to support maintenance of these tools, we welcome
gift funding. "

-Jeyendran


-----Original Message-----
From: John Stewart [mailto:cane.cubo@gmail.com] 
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2012 11:43 AM
To: users@opennlp.apache.org
Subject: Re: OpenNLP vs StanfordNLP

Different licenses.
On Dec 2, 2012 1:25 PM, "György Chityil" <gy...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Been playing with both OpenNLP and StanfordNLP ( 
> http://nlp.stanford.edu/software/tagger.shtml), and it seems to me 
> they overlap on several grounds. Any plans for joining forces? :)
>
> Cheers
>
> --
> Gyuri
> 274 44 98
> 06 30 5888 744
>

Re: OpenNLP vs StanfordNLP

[John Stewart <ca...@gmail.com>]

Different licenses.
On Dec 2, 2012 1:25 PM, "György Chityil" <gy...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Been playing with both OpenNLP and StanfordNLP (
> http://nlp.stanford.edu/software/tagger.shtml), and it seems to me they
> overlap on several grounds. Any plans for joining forces? :)
>
> Cheers
>
> --
> Gyuri
> 274 44 98
> 06 30 5888 744
>