You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@harmony.apache.org by Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com> on 2006/03/21 16:03:09 UTC
Re: [jira] Resolved: (HARMONY-31) Move peformance timing of unit
tests into a decorator class.
I know that you'll be disappointed if I didn't ...
Geir Magnusson Jr (JIRA) wrote:
<snip>
> Resolution: Won't Fix
>
> This has been taken care of elsewhere, IIRC. Resolving for now to see if there's howls of protest...
How was it resolved?
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com)
IBM Java technology centre, UK.
Re: [jira] Resolved: (HARMONY-31) Move peformance timing of unit
tests into a decorator class.
Posted by Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@pobox.com>.
George Harley wrote:
> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>>
>> Do you think this should be re-opened, or an new JIRA created to keep
>> things clear?
>>
>> geir
>
> Hi,
>
> My vote is to keep it closed since the original issue has gone away.
Is there something you want to recover from it that adds functionality?
geir
Re: [jira] Resolved: (HARMONY-31) Move peformance timing of unit
tests into a decorator class.
Posted by George Harley <ge...@googlemail.com>.
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>
>
> George Harley wrote:
>> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Tim Ellison wrote:
>>>> I know that you'll be disappointed if I didn't ...
>>>>
>>>> Geir Magnusson Jr (JIRA) wrote:
>>>> <snip>
>>>>> Resolution: Won't Fix
>>>>>
>>>>> This has been taken care of elsewhere, IIRC. Resolving for now to
>>>>> see if there's howls of protest...
>>>>
>>>> How was it resolved?
>>>
>>> I thought there was a patch that removed it. If there wasn't, happy
>>> to re-open.
>>>
>>> geir
>>
>> Hi Geir,
>>
>> Is this what you mean ?
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-55?page=all
>>
>> Personally, I think that HARMONY-31 was awesome :-)
>
> We all do George!
>
>> At least the basic principle of pushing the auxiliary functionality
>> (in this case timing) up to the test framework is there in the sample
>> code attachment if anyone else is keen to do more in this area.
>
> Do you think this should be re-opened, or an new JIRA created to keep
> things clear?
>
> geir
Hi,
My vote is to keep it closed since the original issue has gone away.
Best regards,
George
>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> George
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Tim
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [jira] Resolved: (HARMONY-31) Move peformance timing of unit
tests into a decorator class.
Posted by Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@pobox.com>.
George Harley wrote:
> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>>
>>
>> Tim Ellison wrote:
>>> I know that you'll be disappointed if I didn't ...
>>>
>>> Geir Magnusson Jr (JIRA) wrote:
>>> <snip>
>>>> Resolution: Won't Fix
>>>>
>>>> This has been taken care of elsewhere, IIRC. Resolving for now to
>>>> see if there's howls of protest...
>>>
>>> How was it resolved?
>>
>> I thought there was a patch that removed it. If there wasn't, happy
>> to re-open.
>>
>> geir
>
> Hi Geir,
>
> Is this what you mean ?
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-55?page=all
>
> Personally, I think that HARMONY-31 was awesome :-)
We all do George!
> At least the basic
> principle of pushing the auxiliary functionality (in this case timing)
> up to the test framework is there in the sample code attachment if
> anyone else is keen to do more in this area.
Do you think this should be re-opened, or an new JIRA created to keep
things clear?
geir
>
> Best regards,
> George
>
>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Tim
>>>
>>
>
>
Re: [jira] Resolved: (HARMONY-31) Move peformance timing of unit
tests into a decorator class.
Posted by George Harley <ge...@googlemail.com>.
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>
>
> Tim Ellison wrote:
>> I know that you'll be disappointed if I didn't ...
>>
>> Geir Magnusson Jr (JIRA) wrote:
>> <snip>
>>> Resolution: Won't Fix
>>>
>>> This has been taken care of elsewhere, IIRC. Resolving for now to
>>> see if there's howls of protest...
>>
>> How was it resolved?
>
> I thought there was a patch that removed it. If there wasn't, happy
> to re-open.
>
> geir
Hi Geir,
Is this what you mean ?
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-55?page=all
Personally, I think that HARMONY-31 was awesome :-) At least the basic
principle of pushing the auxiliary functionality (in this case timing)
up to the test framework is there in the sample code attachment if
anyone else is keen to do more in this area.
Best regards,
George
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tim
>>
>
Re: [jira] Resolved: (HARMONY-31) Move peformance timing of unit
tests into a decorator class.
Posted by Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@pobox.com>.
Tim Ellison wrote:
> I know that you'll be disappointed if I didn't ...
>
> Geir Magnusson Jr (JIRA) wrote:
> <snip>
>> Resolution: Won't Fix
>>
>> This has been taken care of elsewhere, IIRC. Resolving for now to see if there's howls of protest...
>
> How was it resolved?
I thought there was a patch that removed it. If there wasn't, happy to
re-open.
geir
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>