You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@zookeeper.apache.org by Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> on 2014/03/20 21:32:31 UTC
Re: [Release 3.5.0] Any news yet?
I'm resurrecting this thread now that 3.4.6 is out the door. I'm
assuming that we might do a 3.4.7 at some point, but that shouldn't
hold up releasing a 3.5.0.
We discussed a number of good ideas previously in this thread wrt what
we should do for 3.5.0. Any further thoughts?
A big part of the planning will be to clean up Jira and figuring out
what we need to finish. I'll start looking at that but if anyone else
has any ideas of can clean up jiras they are familiar with it would be
helpful.
Here's the list currently slated for 3.5.0 (258 total!): http://bit.ly/1ijYAJF
There are 8 listed blockers at the moment. Most of which have to do
with the introduction of dynamic reconfiguration. Only one jira is PA.
There are 52 PA jiras currently slated for 3.5.0: http://bit.ly/PV21NA
Patrick
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Flavio Junqueira <fp...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Sure, fine with me.
>
> -Flavio
>
> On Jul 10, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
>> It would be good if Flavio wants to try doing the RM. Flavio?
>>
>> thanks
>> mahadev
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Mahadev do you want to RM 3.4.6 or should Flavio try his hand at doing
>>> a release?
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>> 1147 is pretty close. I am working on getting this into trunk.
>>>>
>>>> Hopefully today/tomm.
>>>>
>>>> thanks
>>>> mahadev
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Flavio Junqueira <fp...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>> I've also been wondering about 3.4.6. I don't mind being the RM for 3.5.0 if you want to do 3.4.6.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Flavio
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 9, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd like to see a 3.5.0-alpha soon. I agree re 1147 and iirc it was
>>>>>> pretty close (Mahadev?). ZOOKEEPER-1346 (jetty support for monitoring)
>>>>>> should also go in. It's pretty much ready afair.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm happy to RM 3.5 if we can get past these open issues.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés
>>>>>> <rg...@itevenworks.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Stefan,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 9 July 2013 08:13, Stefan Egli <eg...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We're evaluating using ZooKeeper, and esp the embedded mode (ZOOKEEPER-107 - [0]), for an implementation of the Sling Discovery API ([1]). Since ZOOKEEPER-107 is planned for 3.5.0 I was wondering what the release schedule of 3.5.0 is, or any plan thereof? (I saw a discussion about releasing it from Dec 2012 [1]).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think as of now the biggest blocker is:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1147
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Besides needing a final review it needs better documentation and an
>>>>>>> extra small patch (I proposed one) to support rolling updates when
>>>>>>> enabling local sessions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> -rgs
>>>>>
>
Re: [Release 3.5.0] Any news yet?
Posted by Marshall McMullen <ma...@gmail.com>.
Agree, sounds like a great plan to me as well. Once we get an alpha
release we can do some internal stress testing against it in our lab to
help give higher confidence of its quality.
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki <mi...@cs.stanford.edu>wrote:
> Sounds like a great plan.
>
> There is a patch available for review for flaky startSingleServerTest.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1870
>
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> > I see some great progress in closing out jiras. Kudos all. We
> > currently have 12 blockers for 3.5.0, 5 are listed as PA. Let's keep
> > plugging away on these.
> >
> > The CI environment has gone a bit red of late. On my personal servers
> > I'm seeing it mostly in "startSingleServerTest" though, so perhaps
> > it's localized. Would be good to nail down the flakey tests. I'll try
> > looking into this more (what the flakeys are) and report back. Apache
> > CI seems a bit unstable of late (the jenkins env I mean)
> >
> > I'm thinking we might start creating some Alpha releases, e.g.
> > zookeeper-3.5.0-alpha so that we can get the code into folks hands.
> > They can try it out and give us feedback. It would be alpha quality
> > though, not for production. APIs and new functionality might still
> > change in a non-backward compatible way. We could do this even though
> > we still have some blockers remaining. Once all the blockers are
> > resolved we could move to "beta" status. The APIs, etc... would then
> > be locked. Once things settle out during the beta cycle we could then
> > move off "beta". We'd only make 3.5 "stable" once we feel comfortable
> > with it's quality and after collecting feedback from the community.
> > This is basically what we did for 3.4 branch (and similar to what some
> > other projects do). What do you think?
> >
> > Patrick
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki <mi...@cs.stanford.edu>
> wrote:
> >> ... there is one more. I just canceled it because the patch needs to be
> rebased.
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1794
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki <mi...@cs.stanford.edu>
> wrote:
> >>> There are several large PAs:
> >>>
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1172
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1346
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1607
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1907
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I think I can review ZOOKEEPER-1907 and get it in for 3.5.0, but we
> >>> need shepherds for the other 3 JIRAs. Let me know if anybody has
> >>> cycles to review and check in these patches. Otherwise I'll push them
> >>> out of 3.5.0.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>> --Michi
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Alexander Shraer <sh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>> right - looks like there's a patch there, waiting for review.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <
> rgs@itevenworks.net
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 20 March 2014 13:51, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <rg...@itevenworks.net>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> > what about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1807?
> >>>>> >
> >>>>>
> >>>>> More context: people trying to use Observers in 3.5.0 without that
> fixed
> >>>>> will have issues, for sure.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -rgs
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > -rgs
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > On 20 March 2014 13:48, Alexander Shraer <sh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >> thanks Patrick!
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> regarding dynamic reconfig, IMHO we only have 2 blockers:
> >>>>> >> - add JMX support
> >>>>> >> (ZOOKEEPER-1659<
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1659>
> >>>>> >> )
> >>>>> >> - change leader timeout mechanism to give up when there's no
> quorum of
> >>>>> >> last
> >>>>> >> proposed configuration
> >>>>> >> (ZOOKEEPER-1699<
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1699>
> >>>>> >> )
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> any help with either is greatly appreciated.
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> > I'm resurrecting this thread now that 3.4.6 is out the door. I'm
> >>>>> >> > assuming that we might do a 3.4.7 at some point, but that
> shouldn't
> >>>>> >> > hold up releasing a 3.5.0.
> >>>>> >> >
> >>>>> >> > We discussed a number of good ideas previously in this thread
> wrt what
> >>>>> >> > we should do for 3.5.0. Any further thoughts?
> >>>>> >> >
> >>>>> >> > A big part of the planning will be to clean up Jira and
> figuring out
> >>>>> >> > what we need to finish. I'll start looking at that but if
> anyone else
> >>>>> >> > has any ideas of can clean up jiras they are familiar with it
> would be
> >>>>> >> > helpful.
> >>>>> >> >
> >>>>> >> > Here's the list currently slated for 3.5.0 (258 total!):
> >>>>> >> > http://bit.ly/1ijYAJF
> >>>>> >> >
> >>>>> >> > There are 8 listed blockers at the moment. Most of which have
> to do
> >>>>> >> > with the introduction of dynamic reconfiguration. Only one jira
> is PA.
> >>>>> >> >
> >>>>> >> > There are 52 PA jiras currently slated for 3.5.0:
> >>>>> http://bit.ly/PV21NA
> >>>>> >> >
> >>>>> >> > Patrick
> >>>>> >> >
> >>>>> >> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Flavio Junqueira <
> >>>>> >> fpjunqueira@yahoo.com>
> >>>>> >> > wrote:
> >>>>> >> > > Sure, fine with me.
> >>>>> >> > >
> >>>>> >> > > -Flavio
> >>>>> >> > >
> >>>>> >> > > On Jul 10, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Mahadev Konar <
> mahadev@hortonworks.com
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >> > wrote:
> >>>>> >> > >
> >>>>> >> > >> It would be good if Flavio wants to try doing the RM. Flavio?
> >>>>> >> > >>
> >>>>> >> > >> thanks
> >>>>> >> > >> mahadev
> >>>>> >> > >>
> >>>>> >> > >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Patrick Hunt <
> phunt@apache.org>
> >>>>> >> > wrote:
> >>>>> >> > >>> Mahadev do you want to RM 3.4.6 or should Flavio try his
> hand at
> >>>>> >> doing
> >>>>> >> > >>> a release?
> >>>>> >> > >>>
> >>>>> >> > >>> Patrick
> >>>>> >> > >>>
> >>>>> >> > >>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Mahadev Konar <
> >>>>> >> > mahadev@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> >>>>> >> > >>>> 1147 is pretty close. I am working on getting this into
> trunk.
> >>>>> >> > >>>>
> >>>>> >> > >>>> Hopefully today/tomm.
> >>>>> >> > >>>>
> >>>>> >> > >>>> thanks
> >>>>> >> > >>>> mahadev
> >>>>> >> > >>>>
> >>>>> >> > >>>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Flavio Junqueira <
> >>>>> >> > fpjunqueira@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>>> >> > >>>>> I've also been wondering about 3.4.6. I don't mind being
> the RM
> >>>>> >> for
> >>>>> >> > 3.5.0 if you want to do 3.4.6.
> >>>>> >> > >>>>>
> >>>>> >> > >>>>> -Flavio
> >>>>> >> > >>>>>
> >>>>> >> > >>>>> On Jul 9, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Patrick Hunt <
> phunt@apache.org>
> >>>>> >> wrote:
> >>>>> >> > >>>>>
> >>>>> >> > >>>>>> I'd like to see a 3.5.0-alpha soon. I agree re 1147 and
> iirc it
> >>>>> >> was
> >>>>> >> > >>>>>> pretty close (Mahadev?). ZOOKEEPER-1346 (jetty support
> for
> >>>>> >> > monitoring)
> >>>>> >> > >>>>>> should also go in. It's pretty much ready afair.
> >>>>> >> > >>>>>>
> >>>>> >> > >>>>>> I'm happy to RM 3.5 if we can get past these open issues.
> >>>>> >> > >>>>>>
> >>>>> >> > >>>>>> Patrick
> >>>>> >> > >>>>>>
> >>>>> >> > >>>>>>
> >>>>> >> > >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés
> >>>>> >> > >>>>>> <rg...@itevenworks.net> wrote:
> >>>>> >> > >>>>>>> Hi Stefan,
> >>>>> >> > >>>>>>>
> >>>>> >> > >>>>>>> On 9 July 2013 08:13, Stefan Egli <eg...@adobe.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>
> >>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> We're evaluating using ZooKeeper, and esp the embedded
> mode
> >>>>> >> > (ZOOKEEPER-107 - [0]), for an implementation of the Sling
> Discovery
> >>>>> API
> >>>>> >> > ([1]). Since ZOOKEEPER-107 is planned for 3.5.0 I was wondering
> what
> >>>>> the
> >>>>> >> > release schedule of 3.5.0 is, or any plan thereof? (I saw a
> discussion
> >>>>> >> > about releasing it from Dec 2012 [1]).
> >>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>
> >>>>> >> > >>>>>>>
> >>>>> >> > >>>>>>> I think as of now the biggest blocker is:
> >>>>> >> > >>>>>>>
> >>>>> >> > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1147
> >>>>> >> > >>>>>>>
> >>>>> >> > >>>>>>> Besides needing a final review it needs better
> documentation
> >>>>> >> and an
> >>>>> >> > >>>>>>> extra small patch (I proposed one) to support rolling
> updates
> >>>>> >> when
> >>>>> >> > >>>>>>> enabling local sessions.
> >>>>> >> > >>>>>>>
> >>>>> >> > >>>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>> >> > >>>>>>> -rgs
> >>>>> >> > >>>>>
> >>>>> >> > >
> >>>>> >> >
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>>
>
Re: [Release 3.5.0] Any news yet?
Posted by Michi Mutsuzaki <mi...@cs.stanford.edu>.
Sounds like a great plan.
There is a patch available for review for flaky startSingleServerTest.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1870
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> I see some great progress in closing out jiras. Kudos all. We
> currently have 12 blockers for 3.5.0, 5 are listed as PA. Let's keep
> plugging away on these.
>
> The CI environment has gone a bit red of late. On my personal servers
> I'm seeing it mostly in "startSingleServerTest" though, so perhaps
> it's localized. Would be good to nail down the flakey tests. I'll try
> looking into this more (what the flakeys are) and report back. Apache
> CI seems a bit unstable of late (the jenkins env I mean)
>
> I'm thinking we might start creating some Alpha releases, e.g.
> zookeeper-3.5.0-alpha so that we can get the code into folks hands.
> They can try it out and give us feedback. It would be alpha quality
> though, not for production. APIs and new functionality might still
> change in a non-backward compatible way. We could do this even though
> we still have some blockers remaining. Once all the blockers are
> resolved we could move to "beta" status. The APIs, etc... would then
> be locked. Once things settle out during the beta cycle we could then
> move off "beta". We'd only make 3.5 "stable" once we feel comfortable
> with it's quality and after collecting feedback from the community.
> This is basically what we did for 3.4 branch (and similar to what some
> other projects do). What do you think?
>
> Patrick
>
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki <mi...@cs.stanford.edu> wrote:
>> ... there is one more. I just canceled it because the patch needs to be rebased.
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1794
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki <mi...@cs.stanford.edu> wrote:
>>> There are several large PAs:
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1172
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1346
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1607
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1907
>>>
>>>
>>> I think I can review ZOOKEEPER-1907 and get it in for 3.5.0, but we
>>> need shepherds for the other 3 JIRAs. Let me know if anybody has
>>> cycles to review and check in these patches. Otherwise I'll push them
>>> out of 3.5.0.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> --Michi
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Alexander Shraer <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> right - looks like there's a patch there, waiting for review.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <rgs@itevenworks.net
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 20 March 2014 13:51, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <rg...@itevenworks.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > what about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1807?
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> More context: people trying to use Observers in 3.5.0 without that fixed
>>>>> will have issues, for sure.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -rgs
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > -rgs
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On 20 March 2014 13:48, Alexander Shraer <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >> thanks Patrick!
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> regarding dynamic reconfig, IMHO we only have 2 blockers:
>>>>> >> - add JMX support
>>>>> >> (ZOOKEEPER-1659<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1659>
>>>>> >> )
>>>>> >> - change leader timeout mechanism to give up when there's no quorum of
>>>>> >> last
>>>>> >> proposed configuration
>>>>> >> (ZOOKEEPER-1699<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1699>
>>>>> >> )
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> any help with either is greatly appreciated.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> > I'm resurrecting this thread now that 3.4.6 is out the door. I'm
>>>>> >> > assuming that we might do a 3.4.7 at some point, but that shouldn't
>>>>> >> > hold up releasing a 3.5.0.
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > We discussed a number of good ideas previously in this thread wrt what
>>>>> >> > we should do for 3.5.0. Any further thoughts?
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > A big part of the planning will be to clean up Jira and figuring out
>>>>> >> > what we need to finish. I'll start looking at that but if anyone else
>>>>> >> > has any ideas of can clean up jiras they are familiar with it would be
>>>>> >> > helpful.
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > Here's the list currently slated for 3.5.0 (258 total!):
>>>>> >> > http://bit.ly/1ijYAJF
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > There are 8 listed blockers at the moment. Most of which have to do
>>>>> >> > with the introduction of dynamic reconfiguration. Only one jira is PA.
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > There are 52 PA jiras currently slated for 3.5.0:
>>>>> http://bit.ly/PV21NA
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > Patrick
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Flavio Junqueira <
>>>>> >> fpjunqueira@yahoo.com>
>>>>> >> > wrote:
>>>>> >> > > Sure, fine with me.
>>>>> >> > >
>>>>> >> > > -Flavio
>>>>> >> > >
>>>>> >> > > On Jul 10, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Mahadev Konar <mahadev@hortonworks.com
>>>>> >
>>>>> >> > wrote:
>>>>> >> > >
>>>>> >> > >> It would be good if Flavio wants to try doing the RM. Flavio?
>>>>> >> > >>
>>>>> >> > >> thanks
>>>>> >> > >> mahadev
>>>>> >> > >>
>>>>> >> > >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>>>>> >> > wrote:
>>>>> >> > >>> Mahadev do you want to RM 3.4.6 or should Flavio try his hand at
>>>>> >> doing
>>>>> >> > >>> a release?
>>>>> >> > >>>
>>>>> >> > >>> Patrick
>>>>> >> > >>>
>>>>> >> > >>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Mahadev Konar <
>>>>> >> > mahadev@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>>> >> > >>>> 1147 is pretty close. I am working on getting this into trunk.
>>>>> >> > >>>>
>>>>> >> > >>>> Hopefully today/tomm.
>>>>> >> > >>>>
>>>>> >> > >>>> thanks
>>>>> >> > >>>> mahadev
>>>>> >> > >>>>
>>>>> >> > >>>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Flavio Junqueira <
>>>>> >> > fpjunqueira@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>> >> > >>>>> I've also been wondering about 3.4.6. I don't mind being the RM
>>>>> >> for
>>>>> >> > 3.5.0 if you want to do 3.4.6.
>>>>> >> > >>>>>
>>>>> >> > >>>>> -Flavio
>>>>> >> > >>>>>
>>>>> >> > >>>>> On Jul 9, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>> >> > >>>>>
>>>>> >> > >>>>>> I'd like to see a 3.5.0-alpha soon. I agree re 1147 and iirc it
>>>>> >> was
>>>>> >> > >>>>>> pretty close (Mahadev?). ZOOKEEPER-1346 (jetty support for
>>>>> >> > monitoring)
>>>>> >> > >>>>>> should also go in. It's pretty much ready afair.
>>>>> >> > >>>>>>
>>>>> >> > >>>>>> I'm happy to RM 3.5 if we can get past these open issues.
>>>>> >> > >>>>>>
>>>>> >> > >>>>>> Patrick
>>>>> >> > >>>>>>
>>>>> >> > >>>>>>
>>>>> >> > >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés
>>>>> >> > >>>>>> <rg...@itevenworks.net> wrote:
>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> Hi Stefan,
>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>
>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> On 9 July 2013 08:13, Stefan Egli <eg...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>
>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> We're evaluating using ZooKeeper, and esp the embedded mode
>>>>> >> > (ZOOKEEPER-107 - [0]), for an implementation of the Sling Discovery
>>>>> API
>>>>> >> > ([1]). Since ZOOKEEPER-107 is planned for 3.5.0 I was wondering what
>>>>> the
>>>>> >> > release schedule of 3.5.0 is, or any plan thereof? (I saw a discussion
>>>>> >> > about releasing it from Dec 2012 [1]).
>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>
>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>
>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> I think as of now the biggest blocker is:
>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>
>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1147
>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>
>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> Besides needing a final review it needs better documentation
>>>>> >> and an
>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> extra small patch (I proposed one) to support rolling updates
>>>>> >> when
>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> enabling local sessions.
>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>
>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> -rgs
>>>>> >> > >>>>>
>>>>> >> > >
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
Re: [Release 3.5.0] Any news yet?
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>.
I see some great progress in closing out jiras. Kudos all. We
currently have 12 blockers for 3.5.0, 5 are listed as PA. Let's keep
plugging away on these.
The CI environment has gone a bit red of late. On my personal servers
I'm seeing it mostly in "startSingleServerTest" though, so perhaps
it's localized. Would be good to nail down the flakey tests. I'll try
looking into this more (what the flakeys are) and report back. Apache
CI seems a bit unstable of late (the jenkins env I mean)
I'm thinking we might start creating some Alpha releases, e.g.
zookeeper-3.5.0-alpha so that we can get the code into folks hands.
They can try it out and give us feedback. It would be alpha quality
though, not for production. APIs and new functionality might still
change in a non-backward compatible way. We could do this even though
we still have some blockers remaining. Once all the blockers are
resolved we could move to "beta" status. The APIs, etc... would then
be locked. Once things settle out during the beta cycle we could then
move off "beta". We'd only make 3.5 "stable" once we feel comfortable
with it's quality and after collecting feedback from the community.
This is basically what we did for 3.4 branch (and similar to what some
other projects do). What do you think?
Patrick
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki <mi...@cs.stanford.edu> wrote:
> ... there is one more. I just canceled it because the patch needs to be rebased.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1794
>
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki <mi...@cs.stanford.edu> wrote:
>> There are several large PAs:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1172
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1346
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1607
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1907
>>
>>
>> I think I can review ZOOKEEPER-1907 and get it in for 3.5.0, but we
>> need shepherds for the other 3 JIRAs. Let me know if anybody has
>> cycles to review and check in these patches. Otherwise I'll push them
>> out of 3.5.0.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> --Michi
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Alexander Shraer <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> right - looks like there's a patch there, waiting for review.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <rgs@itevenworks.net
>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 20 March 2014 13:51, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <rg...@itevenworks.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > what about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1807?
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> More context: people trying to use Observers in 3.5.0 without that fixed
>>>> will have issues, for sure.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -rgs
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > -rgs
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On 20 March 2014 13:48, Alexander Shraer <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> thanks Patrick!
>>>> >>
>>>> >> regarding dynamic reconfig, IMHO we only have 2 blockers:
>>>> >> - add JMX support
>>>> >> (ZOOKEEPER-1659<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1659>
>>>> >> )
>>>> >> - change leader timeout mechanism to give up when there's no quorum of
>>>> >> last
>>>> >> proposed configuration
>>>> >> (ZOOKEEPER-1699<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1699>
>>>> >> )
>>>> >>
>>>> >> any help with either is greatly appreciated.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > I'm resurrecting this thread now that 3.4.6 is out the door. I'm
>>>> >> > assuming that we might do a 3.4.7 at some point, but that shouldn't
>>>> >> > hold up releasing a 3.5.0.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > We discussed a number of good ideas previously in this thread wrt what
>>>> >> > we should do for 3.5.0. Any further thoughts?
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > A big part of the planning will be to clean up Jira and figuring out
>>>> >> > what we need to finish. I'll start looking at that but if anyone else
>>>> >> > has any ideas of can clean up jiras they are familiar with it would be
>>>> >> > helpful.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Here's the list currently slated for 3.5.0 (258 total!):
>>>> >> > http://bit.ly/1ijYAJF
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > There are 8 listed blockers at the moment. Most of which have to do
>>>> >> > with the introduction of dynamic reconfiguration. Only one jira is PA.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > There are 52 PA jiras currently slated for 3.5.0:
>>>> http://bit.ly/PV21NA
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Patrick
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Flavio Junqueira <
>>>> >> fpjunqueira@yahoo.com>
>>>> >> > wrote:
>>>> >> > > Sure, fine with me.
>>>> >> > >
>>>> >> > > -Flavio
>>>> >> > >
>>>> >> > > On Jul 10, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Mahadev Konar <mahadev@hortonworks.com
>>>> >
>>>> >> > wrote:
>>>> >> > >
>>>> >> > >> It would be good if Flavio wants to try doing the RM. Flavio?
>>>> >> > >>
>>>> >> > >> thanks
>>>> >> > >> mahadev
>>>> >> > >>
>>>> >> > >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>>>> >> > wrote:
>>>> >> > >>> Mahadev do you want to RM 3.4.6 or should Flavio try his hand at
>>>> >> doing
>>>> >> > >>> a release?
>>>> >> > >>>
>>>> >> > >>> Patrick
>>>> >> > >>>
>>>> >> > >>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Mahadev Konar <
>>>> >> > mahadev@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>> >> > >>>> 1147 is pretty close. I am working on getting this into trunk.
>>>> >> > >>>>
>>>> >> > >>>> Hopefully today/tomm.
>>>> >> > >>>>
>>>> >> > >>>> thanks
>>>> >> > >>>> mahadev
>>>> >> > >>>>
>>>> >> > >>>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Flavio Junqueira <
>>>> >> > fpjunqueira@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> >> > >>>>> I've also been wondering about 3.4.6. I don't mind being the RM
>>>> >> for
>>>> >> > 3.5.0 if you want to do 3.4.6.
>>>> >> > >>>>>
>>>> >> > >>>>> -Flavio
>>>> >> > >>>>>
>>>> >> > >>>>> On Jul 9, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>>>> >> wrote:
>>>> >> > >>>>>
>>>> >> > >>>>>> I'd like to see a 3.5.0-alpha soon. I agree re 1147 and iirc it
>>>> >> was
>>>> >> > >>>>>> pretty close (Mahadev?). ZOOKEEPER-1346 (jetty support for
>>>> >> > monitoring)
>>>> >> > >>>>>> should also go in. It's pretty much ready afair.
>>>> >> > >>>>>>
>>>> >> > >>>>>> I'm happy to RM 3.5 if we can get past these open issues.
>>>> >> > >>>>>>
>>>> >> > >>>>>> Patrick
>>>> >> > >>>>>>
>>>> >> > >>>>>>
>>>> >> > >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés
>>>> >> > >>>>>> <rg...@itevenworks.net> wrote:
>>>> >> > >>>>>>> Hi Stefan,
>>>> >> > >>>>>>>
>>>> >> > >>>>>>> On 9 July 2013 08:13, Stefan Egli <eg...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>
>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> We're evaluating using ZooKeeper, and esp the embedded mode
>>>> >> > (ZOOKEEPER-107 - [0]), for an implementation of the Sling Discovery
>>>> API
>>>> >> > ([1]). Since ZOOKEEPER-107 is planned for 3.5.0 I was wondering what
>>>> the
>>>> >> > release schedule of 3.5.0 is, or any plan thereof? (I saw a discussion
>>>> >> > about releasing it from Dec 2012 [1]).
>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>
>>>> >> > >>>>>>>
>>>> >> > >>>>>>> I think as of now the biggest blocker is:
>>>> >> > >>>>>>>
>>>> >> > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1147
>>>> >> > >>>>>>>
>>>> >> > >>>>>>> Besides needing a final review it needs better documentation
>>>> >> and an
>>>> >> > >>>>>>> extra small patch (I proposed one) to support rolling updates
>>>> >> when
>>>> >> > >>>>>>> enabling local sessions.
>>>> >> > >>>>>>>
>>>> >> > >>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>> >> > >>>>>>> -rgs
>>>> >> > >>>>>
>>>> >> > >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
Re: [Release 3.5.0] Any news yet?
Posted by Michi Mutsuzaki <mi...@cs.stanford.edu>.
... there is one more. I just canceled it because the patch needs to be rebased.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1794
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki <mi...@cs.stanford.edu> wrote:
> There are several large PAs:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1172
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1346
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1607
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1907
>
>
> I think I can review ZOOKEEPER-1907 and get it in for 3.5.0, but we
> need shepherds for the other 3 JIRAs. Let me know if anybody has
> cycles to review and check in these patches. Otherwise I'll push them
> out of 3.5.0.
>
> Thanks!
> --Michi
>
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Alexander Shraer <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> right - looks like there's a patch there, waiting for review.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <rgs@itevenworks.net
>>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 20 March 2014 13:51, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <rg...@itevenworks.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > what about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1807?
>>> >
>>>
>>> More context: people trying to use Observers in 3.5.0 without that fixed
>>> will have issues, for sure.
>>>
>>>
>>> -rgs
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > -rgs
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 20 March 2014 13:48, Alexander Shraer <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> thanks Patrick!
>>> >>
>>> >> regarding dynamic reconfig, IMHO we only have 2 blockers:
>>> >> - add JMX support
>>> >> (ZOOKEEPER-1659<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1659>
>>> >> )
>>> >> - change leader timeout mechanism to give up when there's no quorum of
>>> >> last
>>> >> proposed configuration
>>> >> (ZOOKEEPER-1699<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1699>
>>> >> )
>>> >>
>>> >> any help with either is greatly appreciated.
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> > I'm resurrecting this thread now that 3.4.6 is out the door. I'm
>>> >> > assuming that we might do a 3.4.7 at some point, but that shouldn't
>>> >> > hold up releasing a 3.5.0.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > We discussed a number of good ideas previously in this thread wrt what
>>> >> > we should do for 3.5.0. Any further thoughts?
>>> >> >
>>> >> > A big part of the planning will be to clean up Jira and figuring out
>>> >> > what we need to finish. I'll start looking at that but if anyone else
>>> >> > has any ideas of can clean up jiras they are familiar with it would be
>>> >> > helpful.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Here's the list currently slated for 3.5.0 (258 total!):
>>> >> > http://bit.ly/1ijYAJF
>>> >> >
>>> >> > There are 8 listed blockers at the moment. Most of which have to do
>>> >> > with the introduction of dynamic reconfiguration. Only one jira is PA.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > There are 52 PA jiras currently slated for 3.5.0:
>>> http://bit.ly/PV21NA
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Patrick
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Flavio Junqueira <
>>> >> fpjunqueira@yahoo.com>
>>> >> > wrote:
>>> >> > > Sure, fine with me.
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > -Flavio
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > On Jul 10, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Mahadev Konar <mahadev@hortonworks.com
>>> >
>>> >> > wrote:
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > >> It would be good if Flavio wants to try doing the RM. Flavio?
>>> >> > >>
>>> >> > >> thanks
>>> >> > >> mahadev
>>> >> > >>
>>> >> > >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>>> >> > wrote:
>>> >> > >>> Mahadev do you want to RM 3.4.6 or should Flavio try his hand at
>>> >> doing
>>> >> > >>> a release?
>>> >> > >>>
>>> >> > >>> Patrick
>>> >> > >>>
>>> >> > >>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Mahadev Konar <
>>> >> > mahadev@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>> >> > >>>> 1147 is pretty close. I am working on getting this into trunk.
>>> >> > >>>>
>>> >> > >>>> Hopefully today/tomm.
>>> >> > >>>>
>>> >> > >>>> thanks
>>> >> > >>>> mahadev
>>> >> > >>>>
>>> >> > >>>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Flavio Junqueira <
>>> >> > fpjunqueira@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> >> > >>>>> I've also been wondering about 3.4.6. I don't mind being the RM
>>> >> for
>>> >> > 3.5.0 if you want to do 3.4.6.
>>> >> > >>>>>
>>> >> > >>>>> -Flavio
>>> >> > >>>>>
>>> >> > >>>>> On Jul 9, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> > >>>>>
>>> >> > >>>>>> I'd like to see a 3.5.0-alpha soon. I agree re 1147 and iirc it
>>> >> was
>>> >> > >>>>>> pretty close (Mahadev?). ZOOKEEPER-1346 (jetty support for
>>> >> > monitoring)
>>> >> > >>>>>> should also go in. It's pretty much ready afair.
>>> >> > >>>>>>
>>> >> > >>>>>> I'm happy to RM 3.5 if we can get past these open issues.
>>> >> > >>>>>>
>>> >> > >>>>>> Patrick
>>> >> > >>>>>>
>>> >> > >>>>>>
>>> >> > >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés
>>> >> > >>>>>> <rg...@itevenworks.net> wrote:
>>> >> > >>>>>>> Hi Stefan,
>>> >> > >>>>>>>
>>> >> > >>>>>>> On 9 July 2013 08:13, Stefan Egli <eg...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>> >> > >>>>>>>> Hi,
>>> >> > >>>>>>>>
>>> >> > >>>>>>>> We're evaluating using ZooKeeper, and esp the embedded mode
>>> >> > (ZOOKEEPER-107 - [0]), for an implementation of the Sling Discovery
>>> API
>>> >> > ([1]). Since ZOOKEEPER-107 is planned for 3.5.0 I was wondering what
>>> the
>>> >> > release schedule of 3.5.0 is, or any plan thereof? (I saw a discussion
>>> >> > about releasing it from Dec 2012 [1]).
>>> >> > >>>>>>>>
>>> >> > >>>>>>>
>>> >> > >>>>>>> I think as of now the biggest blocker is:
>>> >> > >>>>>>>
>>> >> > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1147
>>> >> > >>>>>>>
>>> >> > >>>>>>> Besides needing a final review it needs better documentation
>>> >> and an
>>> >> > >>>>>>> extra small patch (I proposed one) to support rolling updates
>>> >> when
>>> >> > >>>>>>> enabling local sessions.
>>> >> > >>>>>>>
>>> >> > >>>>>>> Cheers,
>>> >> > >>>>>>> -rgs
>>> >> > >>>>>
>>> >> > >
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
Re: [Release 3.5.0] Any news yet?
Posted by Michi Mutsuzaki <mi...@cs.stanford.edu>.
There are several large PAs:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1172
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1346
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1607
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1907
I think I can review ZOOKEEPER-1907 and get it in for 3.5.0, but we
need shepherds for the other 3 JIRAs. Let me know if anybody has
cycles to review and check in these patches. Otherwise I'll push them
out of 3.5.0.
Thanks!
--Michi
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Alexander Shraer <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> right - looks like there's a patch there, waiting for review.
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <rgs@itevenworks.net
>> wrote:
>
>> On 20 March 2014 13:51, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <rg...@itevenworks.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > what about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1807?
>> >
>>
>> More context: people trying to use Observers in 3.5.0 without that fixed
>> will have issues, for sure.
>>
>>
>> -rgs
>>
>>
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > -rgs
>> >
>> >
>> > On 20 March 2014 13:48, Alexander Shraer <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> thanks Patrick!
>> >>
>> >> regarding dynamic reconfig, IMHO we only have 2 blockers:
>> >> - add JMX support
>> >> (ZOOKEEPER-1659<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1659>
>> >> )
>> >> - change leader timeout mechanism to give up when there's no quorum of
>> >> last
>> >> proposed configuration
>> >> (ZOOKEEPER-1699<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1699>
>> >> )
>> >>
>> >> any help with either is greatly appreciated.
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > I'm resurrecting this thread now that 3.4.6 is out the door. I'm
>> >> > assuming that we might do a 3.4.7 at some point, but that shouldn't
>> >> > hold up releasing a 3.5.0.
>> >> >
>> >> > We discussed a number of good ideas previously in this thread wrt what
>> >> > we should do for 3.5.0. Any further thoughts?
>> >> >
>> >> > A big part of the planning will be to clean up Jira and figuring out
>> >> > what we need to finish. I'll start looking at that but if anyone else
>> >> > has any ideas of can clean up jiras they are familiar with it would be
>> >> > helpful.
>> >> >
>> >> > Here's the list currently slated for 3.5.0 (258 total!):
>> >> > http://bit.ly/1ijYAJF
>> >> >
>> >> > There are 8 listed blockers at the moment. Most of which have to do
>> >> > with the introduction of dynamic reconfiguration. Only one jira is PA.
>> >> >
>> >> > There are 52 PA jiras currently slated for 3.5.0:
>> http://bit.ly/PV21NA
>> >> >
>> >> > Patrick
>> >> >
>> >> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Flavio Junqueira <
>> >> fpjunqueira@yahoo.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> > > Sure, fine with me.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > -Flavio
>> >> > >
>> >> > > On Jul 10, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Mahadev Konar <mahadev@hortonworks.com
>> >
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > >> It would be good if Flavio wants to try doing the RM. Flavio?
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> thanks
>> >> > >> mahadev
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> > >>> Mahadev do you want to RM 3.4.6 or should Flavio try his hand at
>> >> doing
>> >> > >>> a release?
>> >> > >>>
>> >> > >>> Patrick
>> >> > >>>
>> >> > >>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Mahadev Konar <
>> >> > mahadev@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> >> > >>>> 1147 is pretty close. I am working on getting this into trunk.
>> >> > >>>>
>> >> > >>>> Hopefully today/tomm.
>> >> > >>>>
>> >> > >>>> thanks
>> >> > >>>> mahadev
>> >> > >>>>
>> >> > >>>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Flavio Junqueira <
>> >> > fpjunqueira@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> > >>>>> I've also been wondering about 3.4.6. I don't mind being the RM
>> >> for
>> >> > 3.5.0 if you want to do 3.4.6.
>> >> > >>>>>
>> >> > >>>>> -Flavio
>> >> > >>>>>
>> >> > >>>>> On Jul 9, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > >>>>>
>> >> > >>>>>> I'd like to see a 3.5.0-alpha soon. I agree re 1147 and iirc it
>> >> was
>> >> > >>>>>> pretty close (Mahadev?). ZOOKEEPER-1346 (jetty support for
>> >> > monitoring)
>> >> > >>>>>> should also go in. It's pretty much ready afair.
>> >> > >>>>>>
>> >> > >>>>>> I'm happy to RM 3.5 if we can get past these open issues.
>> >> > >>>>>>
>> >> > >>>>>> Patrick
>> >> > >>>>>>
>> >> > >>>>>>
>> >> > >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés
>> >> > >>>>>> <rg...@itevenworks.net> wrote:
>> >> > >>>>>>> Hi Stefan,
>> >> > >>>>>>>
>> >> > >>>>>>> On 9 July 2013 08:13, Stefan Egli <eg...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >> > >>>>>>>> Hi,
>> >> > >>>>>>>>
>> >> > >>>>>>>> We're evaluating using ZooKeeper, and esp the embedded mode
>> >> > (ZOOKEEPER-107 - [0]), for an implementation of the Sling Discovery
>> API
>> >> > ([1]). Since ZOOKEEPER-107 is planned for 3.5.0 I was wondering what
>> the
>> >> > release schedule of 3.5.0 is, or any plan thereof? (I saw a discussion
>> >> > about releasing it from Dec 2012 [1]).
>> >> > >>>>>>>>
>> >> > >>>>>>>
>> >> > >>>>>>> I think as of now the biggest blocker is:
>> >> > >>>>>>>
>> >> > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1147
>> >> > >>>>>>>
>> >> > >>>>>>> Besides needing a final review it needs better documentation
>> >> and an
>> >> > >>>>>>> extra small patch (I proposed one) to support rolling updates
>> >> when
>> >> > >>>>>>> enabling local sessions.
>> >> > >>>>>>>
>> >> > >>>>>>> Cheers,
>> >> > >>>>>>> -rgs
>> >> > >>>>>
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
Re: [Release 3.5.0] Any news yet?
Posted by Alexander Shraer <sh...@gmail.com>.
right - looks like there's a patch there, waiting for review.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <rgs@itevenworks.net
> wrote:
> On 20 March 2014 13:51, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <rg...@itevenworks.net>
> wrote:
>
> > what about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1807?
> >
>
> More context: people trying to use Observers in 3.5.0 without that fixed
> will have issues, for sure.
>
>
> -rgs
>
>
>
> >
> >
> > -rgs
> >
> >
> > On 20 March 2014 13:48, Alexander Shraer <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> thanks Patrick!
> >>
> >> regarding dynamic reconfig, IMHO we only have 2 blockers:
> >> - add JMX support
> >> (ZOOKEEPER-1659<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1659>
> >> )
> >> - change leader timeout mechanism to give up when there's no quorum of
> >> last
> >> proposed configuration
> >> (ZOOKEEPER-1699<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1699>
> >> )
> >>
> >> any help with either is greatly appreciated.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I'm resurrecting this thread now that 3.4.6 is out the door. I'm
> >> > assuming that we might do a 3.4.7 at some point, but that shouldn't
> >> > hold up releasing a 3.5.0.
> >> >
> >> > We discussed a number of good ideas previously in this thread wrt what
> >> > we should do for 3.5.0. Any further thoughts?
> >> >
> >> > A big part of the planning will be to clean up Jira and figuring out
> >> > what we need to finish. I'll start looking at that but if anyone else
> >> > has any ideas of can clean up jiras they are familiar with it would be
> >> > helpful.
> >> >
> >> > Here's the list currently slated for 3.5.0 (258 total!):
> >> > http://bit.ly/1ijYAJF
> >> >
> >> > There are 8 listed blockers at the moment. Most of which have to do
> >> > with the introduction of dynamic reconfiguration. Only one jira is PA.
> >> >
> >> > There are 52 PA jiras currently slated for 3.5.0:
> http://bit.ly/PV21NA
> >> >
> >> > Patrick
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Flavio Junqueira <
> >> fpjunqueira@yahoo.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > Sure, fine with me.
> >> > >
> >> > > -Flavio
> >> > >
> >> > > On Jul 10, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Mahadev Konar <mahadev@hortonworks.com
> >
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> It would be good if Flavio wants to try doing the RM. Flavio?
> >> > >>
> >> > >> thanks
> >> > >> mahadev
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >>> Mahadev do you want to RM 3.4.6 or should Flavio try his hand at
> >> doing
> >> > >>> a release?
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Patrick
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Mahadev Konar <
> >> > mahadev@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> >> > >>>> 1147 is pretty close. I am working on getting this into trunk.
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> Hopefully today/tomm.
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> thanks
> >> > >>>> mahadev
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Flavio Junqueira <
> >> > fpjunqueira@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> > >>>>> I've also been wondering about 3.4.6. I don't mind being the RM
> >> for
> >> > 3.5.0 if you want to do 3.4.6.
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>> -Flavio
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>> On Jul 9, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>>> I'd like to see a 3.5.0-alpha soon. I agree re 1147 and iirc it
> >> was
> >> > >>>>>> pretty close (Mahadev?). ZOOKEEPER-1346 (jetty support for
> >> > monitoring)
> >> > >>>>>> should also go in. It's pretty much ready afair.
> >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>> I'm happy to RM 3.5 if we can get past these open issues.
> >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>> Patrick
> >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés
> >> > >>>>>> <rg...@itevenworks.net> wrote:
> >> > >>>>>>> Hi Stefan,
> >> > >>>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>>> On 9 July 2013 08:13, Stefan Egli <eg...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >> > >>>>>>>> Hi,
> >> > >>>>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>>>> We're evaluating using ZooKeeper, and esp the embedded mode
> >> > (ZOOKEEPER-107 - [0]), for an implementation of the Sling Discovery
> API
> >> > ([1]). Since ZOOKEEPER-107 is planned for 3.5.0 I was wondering what
> the
> >> > release schedule of 3.5.0 is, or any plan thereof? (I saw a discussion
> >> > about releasing it from Dec 2012 [1]).
> >> > >>>>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>>> I think as of now the biggest blocker is:
> >> > >>>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1147
> >> > >>>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>>> Besides needing a final review it needs better documentation
> >> and an
> >> > >>>>>>> extra small patch (I proposed one) to support rolling updates
> >> when
> >> > >>>>>>> enabling local sessions.
> >> > >>>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>>> Cheers,
> >> > >>>>>>> -rgs
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
Re: [Release 3.5.0] Any news yet?
Posted by Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <rg...@itevenworks.net>.
On 20 March 2014 13:51, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <rg...@itevenworks.net> wrote:
> what about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1807?
>
More context: people trying to use Observers in 3.5.0 without that fixed
will have issues, for sure.
-rgs
>
>
> -rgs
>
>
> On 20 March 2014 13:48, Alexander Shraer <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> thanks Patrick!
>>
>> regarding dynamic reconfig, IMHO we only have 2 blockers:
>> - add JMX support
>> (ZOOKEEPER-1659<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1659>
>> )
>> - change leader timeout mechanism to give up when there's no quorum of
>> last
>> proposed configuration
>> (ZOOKEEPER-1699<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1699>
>> )
>>
>> any help with either is greatly appreciated.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > I'm resurrecting this thread now that 3.4.6 is out the door. I'm
>> > assuming that we might do a 3.4.7 at some point, but that shouldn't
>> > hold up releasing a 3.5.0.
>> >
>> > We discussed a number of good ideas previously in this thread wrt what
>> > we should do for 3.5.0. Any further thoughts?
>> >
>> > A big part of the planning will be to clean up Jira and figuring out
>> > what we need to finish. I'll start looking at that but if anyone else
>> > has any ideas of can clean up jiras they are familiar with it would be
>> > helpful.
>> >
>> > Here's the list currently slated for 3.5.0 (258 total!):
>> > http://bit.ly/1ijYAJF
>> >
>> > There are 8 listed blockers at the moment. Most of which have to do
>> > with the introduction of dynamic reconfiguration. Only one jira is PA.
>> >
>> > There are 52 PA jiras currently slated for 3.5.0: http://bit.ly/PV21NA
>> >
>> > Patrick
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Flavio Junqueira <
>> fpjunqueira@yahoo.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > Sure, fine with me.
>> > >
>> > > -Flavio
>> > >
>> > > On Jul 10, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> It would be good if Flavio wants to try doing the RM. Flavio?
>> > >>
>> > >> thanks
>> > >> mahadev
>> > >>
>> > >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > >>> Mahadev do you want to RM 3.4.6 or should Flavio try his hand at
>> doing
>> > >>> a release?
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Patrick
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Mahadev Konar <
>> > mahadev@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> > >>>> 1147 is pretty close. I am working on getting this into trunk.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Hopefully today/tomm.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> thanks
>> > >>>> mahadev
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Flavio Junqueira <
>> > fpjunqueira@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > >>>>> I've also been wondering about 3.4.6. I don't mind being the RM
>> for
>> > 3.5.0 if you want to do 3.4.6.
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> -Flavio
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> On Jul 9, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>>> I'd like to see a 3.5.0-alpha soon. I agree re 1147 and iirc it
>> was
>> > >>>>>> pretty close (Mahadev?). ZOOKEEPER-1346 (jetty support for
>> > monitoring)
>> > >>>>>> should also go in. It's pretty much ready afair.
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> I'm happy to RM 3.5 if we can get past these open issues.
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> Patrick
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés
>> > >>>>>> <rg...@itevenworks.net> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>> Hi Stefan,
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> On 9 July 2013 08:13, Stefan Egli <eg...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>> Hi,
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> We're evaluating using ZooKeeper, and esp the embedded mode
>> > (ZOOKEEPER-107 - [0]), for an implementation of the Sling Discovery API
>> > ([1]). Since ZOOKEEPER-107 is planned for 3.5.0 I was wondering what the
>> > release schedule of 3.5.0 is, or any plan thereof? (I saw a discussion
>> > about releasing it from Dec 2012 [1]).
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> I think as of now the biggest blocker is:
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1147
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> Besides needing a final review it needs better documentation
>> and an
>> > >>>>>>> extra small patch (I proposed one) to support rolling updates
>> when
>> > >>>>>>> enabling local sessions.
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> Cheers,
>> > >>>>>>> -rgs
>> > >>>>>
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: [Release 3.5.0] Any news yet?
Posted by Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <rg...@itevenworks.net>.
what about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1807?
-rgs
On 20 March 2014 13:48, Alexander Shraer <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> thanks Patrick!
>
> regarding dynamic reconfig, IMHO we only have 2 blockers:
> - add JMX support
> (ZOOKEEPER-1659<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1659>
> )
> - change leader timeout mechanism to give up when there's no quorum of last
> proposed configuration
> (ZOOKEEPER-1699<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1699>
> )
>
> any help with either is greatly appreciated.
>
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I'm resurrecting this thread now that 3.4.6 is out the door. I'm
> > assuming that we might do a 3.4.7 at some point, but that shouldn't
> > hold up releasing a 3.5.0.
> >
> > We discussed a number of good ideas previously in this thread wrt what
> > we should do for 3.5.0. Any further thoughts?
> >
> > A big part of the planning will be to clean up Jira and figuring out
> > what we need to finish. I'll start looking at that but if anyone else
> > has any ideas of can clean up jiras they are familiar with it would be
> > helpful.
> >
> > Here's the list currently slated for 3.5.0 (258 total!):
> > http://bit.ly/1ijYAJF
> >
> > There are 8 listed blockers at the moment. Most of which have to do
> > with the introduction of dynamic reconfiguration. Only one jira is PA.
> >
> > There are 52 PA jiras currently slated for 3.5.0: http://bit.ly/PV21NA
> >
> > Patrick
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Flavio Junqueira <fpjunqueira@yahoo.com
> >
> > wrote:
> > > Sure, fine with me.
> > >
> > > -Flavio
> > >
> > > On Jul 10, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> It would be good if Flavio wants to try doing the RM. Flavio?
> > >>
> > >> thanks
> > >> mahadev
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >>> Mahadev do you want to RM 3.4.6 or should Flavio try his hand at
> doing
> > >>> a release?
> > >>>
> > >>> Patrick
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Mahadev Konar <
> > mahadev@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> > >>>> 1147 is pretty close. I am working on getting this into trunk.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Hopefully today/tomm.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> thanks
> > >>>> mahadev
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Flavio Junqueira <
> > fpjunqueira@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >>>>> I've also been wondering about 3.4.6. I don't mind being the RM for
> > 3.5.0 if you want to do 3.4.6.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> -Flavio
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Jul 9, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> I'd like to see a 3.5.0-alpha soon. I agree re 1147 and iirc it
> was
> > >>>>>> pretty close (Mahadev?). ZOOKEEPER-1346 (jetty support for
> > monitoring)
> > >>>>>> should also go in. It's pretty much ready afair.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I'm happy to RM 3.5 if we can get past these open issues.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Patrick
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés
> > >>>>>> <rg...@itevenworks.net> wrote:
> > >>>>>>> Hi Stefan,
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On 9 July 2013 08:13, Stefan Egli <eg...@adobe.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> We're evaluating using ZooKeeper, and esp the embedded mode
> > (ZOOKEEPER-107 - [0]), for an implementation of the Sling Discovery API
> > ([1]). Since ZOOKEEPER-107 is planned for 3.5.0 I was wondering what the
> > release schedule of 3.5.0 is, or any plan thereof? (I saw a discussion
> > about releasing it from Dec 2012 [1]).
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I think as of now the biggest blocker is:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1147
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Besides needing a final review it needs better documentation and
> an
> > >>>>>>> extra small patch (I proposed one) to support rolling updates
> when
> > >>>>>>> enabling local sessions.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Cheers,
> > >>>>>>> -rgs
> > >>>>>
> > >
> >
>
Re: [Release 3.5.0] Any news yet?
Posted by Alexander Shraer <sh...@gmail.com>.
thanks Patrick!
regarding dynamic reconfig, IMHO we only have 2 blockers:
- add JMX support
(ZOOKEEPER-1659<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1659>
)
- change leader timeout mechanism to give up when there's no quorum of last
proposed configuration
(ZOOKEEPER-1699<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1699>
)
any help with either is greatly appreciated.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> I'm resurrecting this thread now that 3.4.6 is out the door. I'm
> assuming that we might do a 3.4.7 at some point, but that shouldn't
> hold up releasing a 3.5.0.
>
> We discussed a number of good ideas previously in this thread wrt what
> we should do for 3.5.0. Any further thoughts?
>
> A big part of the planning will be to clean up Jira and figuring out
> what we need to finish. I'll start looking at that but if anyone else
> has any ideas of can clean up jiras they are familiar with it would be
> helpful.
>
> Here's the list currently slated for 3.5.0 (258 total!):
> http://bit.ly/1ijYAJF
>
> There are 8 listed blockers at the moment. Most of which have to do
> with the introduction of dynamic reconfiguration. Only one jira is PA.
>
> There are 52 PA jiras currently slated for 3.5.0: http://bit.ly/PV21NA
>
> Patrick
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Flavio Junqueira <fp...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > Sure, fine with me.
> >
> > -Flavio
> >
> > On Jul 10, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> It would be good if Flavio wants to try doing the RM. Flavio?
> >>
> >> thanks
> >> mahadev
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>> Mahadev do you want to RM 3.4.6 or should Flavio try his hand at doing
> >>> a release?
> >>>
> >>> Patrick
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Mahadev Konar <
> mahadev@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> >>>> 1147 is pretty close. I am working on getting this into trunk.
> >>>>
> >>>> Hopefully today/tomm.
> >>>>
> >>>> thanks
> >>>> mahadev
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Flavio Junqueira <
> fpjunqueira@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>>> I've also been wondering about 3.4.6. I don't mind being the RM for
> 3.5.0 if you want to do 3.4.6.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Flavio
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Jul 9, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I'd like to see a 3.5.0-alpha soon. I agree re 1147 and iirc it was
> >>>>>> pretty close (Mahadev?). ZOOKEEPER-1346 (jetty support for
> monitoring)
> >>>>>> should also go in. It's pretty much ready afair.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I'm happy to RM 3.5 if we can get past these open issues.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Patrick
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés
> >>>>>> <rg...@itevenworks.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>> Hi Stefan,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 9 July 2013 08:13, Stefan Egli <eg...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> We're evaluating using ZooKeeper, and esp the embedded mode
> (ZOOKEEPER-107 - [0]), for an implementation of the Sling Discovery API
> ([1]). Since ZOOKEEPER-107 is planned for 3.5.0 I was wondering what the
> release schedule of 3.5.0 is, or any plan thereof? (I saw a discussion
> about releasing it from Dec 2012 [1]).
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I think as of now the biggest blocker is:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1147
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Besides needing a final review it needs better documentation and an
> >>>>>>> extra small patch (I proposed one) to support rolling updates when
> >>>>>>> enabling local sessions.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>>> -rgs
> >>>>>
> >
>
Re: [Release 3.5.0] Any news yet?
Posted by Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <rg...@itevenworks.net>.
This is awesome! I'll go over the ones I've been involved with but happy to
help review & test out any other issues - just lemme know :-)
-rgs
On 20 March 2014 13:32, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> I'm resurrecting this thread now that 3.4.6 is out the door. I'm
> assuming that we might do a 3.4.7 at some point, but that shouldn't
> hold up releasing a 3.5.0.
>
> We discussed a number of good ideas previously in this thread wrt what
> we should do for 3.5.0. Any further thoughts?
>
> A big part of the planning will be to clean up Jira and figuring out
> what we need to finish. I'll start looking at that but if anyone else
> has any ideas of can clean up jiras they are familiar with it would be
> helpful.
>
> Here's the list currently slated for 3.5.0 (258 total!):
> http://bit.ly/1ijYAJF
>
> There are 8 listed blockers at the moment. Most of which have to do
> with the introduction of dynamic reconfiguration. Only one jira is PA.
>
> There are 52 PA jiras currently slated for 3.5.0: http://bit.ly/PV21NA
>
> Patrick
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Flavio Junqueira <fp...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > Sure, fine with me.
> >
> > -Flavio
> >
> > On Jul 10, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> It would be good if Flavio wants to try doing the RM. Flavio?
> >>
> >> thanks
> >> mahadev
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>> Mahadev do you want to RM 3.4.6 or should Flavio try his hand at doing
> >>> a release?
> >>>
> >>> Patrick
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Mahadev Konar <
> mahadev@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> >>>> 1147 is pretty close. I am working on getting this into trunk.
> >>>>
> >>>> Hopefully today/tomm.
> >>>>
> >>>> thanks
> >>>> mahadev
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Flavio Junqueira <
> fpjunqueira@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>>> I've also been wondering about 3.4.6. I don't mind being the RM for
> 3.5.0 if you want to do 3.4.6.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Flavio
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Jul 9, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I'd like to see a 3.5.0-alpha soon. I agree re 1147 and iirc it was
> >>>>>> pretty close (Mahadev?). ZOOKEEPER-1346 (jetty support for
> monitoring)
> >>>>>> should also go in. It's pretty much ready afair.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I'm happy to RM 3.5 if we can get past these open issues.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Patrick
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés
> >>>>>> <rg...@itevenworks.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>> Hi Stefan,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 9 July 2013 08:13, Stefan Egli <eg...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> We're evaluating using ZooKeeper, and esp the embedded mode
> (ZOOKEEPER-107 - [0]), for an implementation of the Sling Discovery API
> ([1]). Since ZOOKEEPER-107 is planned for 3.5.0 I was wondering what the
> release schedule of 3.5.0 is, or any plan thereof? (I saw a discussion
> about releasing it from Dec 2012 [1]).
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I think as of now the biggest blocker is:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1147
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Besides needing a final review it needs better documentation and an
> >>>>>>> extra small patch (I proposed one) to support rolling updates when
> >>>>>>> enabling local sessions.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>>> -rgs
> >>>>>
> >
>