You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jspwiki.apache.org by Janne Jalkanen <Ja...@ecyrd.com> on 2008/10/05 16:12:54 UTC
Re: svn commit: r701795 - in /incubator/jspwiki/trunk: ChangeLog LICENSE NOTICE
> -posteditor.js MIT-like, but unknown
> +posteditor.js doc/LICENSE.mit
Dirk, did you check that the posteditor license is really the MIT -
license? it says "MIT-like", but there is no such license - it
either is MIT, or it isn't.
/Janne
Re: svn commit: r701795 - in /incubator/jspwiki/trunk: ChangeLog
LICENSE NOTICE
Posted by Andrew Jaquith <an...@me.com>.
Selenium doesn't need custom-rhino. So we should be able to remove it.
On Oct 5, 2008, at 3:06 PM, Dirk Frederickx wrote:
> Mmm, could be.
> Andrew, could you help to check this out ? So far I am not been
> successful in running the selenium stuff from ant.
>
>
> dirk
>
> On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 9:03 PM, Janne Jalkanen <Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com
> > wrote:
>>
>> Does Selenium need it? If not, then I think it's ok to remove.
>>
>> /Janne
>>
>> On 5 Oct 2008, at 21:28, Dirk Frederickx wrote:
>>
>>> Janne,
>>>
>>>
>>> Yep, you are right. I'll correct the LICENSE file. Sorry.
>>>
>>>
>>> ===========
>>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> custom_rhino.jar is still mentioned in the LICENSE file.
>>> I recall it was introduced to compress the js files by the DOJO
>>> compressor.
>>> However, we switched to the YUI compressor which also compresses
>>> CSS.
>>>
>>> Can somebody check/confirm whether it is save to remove this JAR .
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> dirk
>>
>>
Re: svn commit: r701795 - in /incubator/jspwiki/trunk: ChangeLog LICENSE NOTICE
Posted by Dirk Frederickx <di...@gmail.com>.
Mmm, could be.
Andrew, could you help to check this out ? So far I am not been
successful in running the selenium stuff from ant.
dirk
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 9:03 PM, Janne Jalkanen <Ja...@ecyrd.com> wrote:
>
> Does Selenium need it? If not, then I think it's ok to remove.
>
> /Janne
>
> On 5 Oct 2008, at 21:28, Dirk Frederickx wrote:
>
>> Janne,
>>
>>
>> Yep, you are right. I'll correct the LICENSE file. Sorry.
>>
>>
>> ===========
>>
>> All,
>>
>> custom_rhino.jar is still mentioned in the LICENSE file.
>> I recall it was introduced to compress the js files by the DOJO
>> compressor.
>> However, we switched to the YUI compressor which also compresses CSS.
>>
>> Can somebody check/confirm whether it is save to remove this JAR .
>>
>>
>>
>> dirk
>
>
Re: svn commit: r701795 - in /incubator/jspwiki/trunk: ChangeLog LICENSE NOTICE
Posted by Janne Jalkanen <Ja...@ecyrd.com>.
Does Selenium need it? If not, then I think it's ok to remove.
/Janne
On 5 Oct 2008, at 21:28, Dirk Frederickx wrote:
> Janne,
>
>
> Yep, you are right. I'll correct the LICENSE file. Sorry.
>
>
> ===========
>
> All,
>
> custom_rhino.jar is still mentioned in the LICENSE file.
> I recall it was introduced to compress the js files by the DOJO
> compressor.
> However, we switched to the YUI compressor which also compresses CSS.
>
> Can somebody check/confirm whether it is save to remove this JAR .
>
>
>
> dirk
Re: svn commit: r701795 - in /incubator/jspwiki/trunk: ChangeLog LICENSE NOTICE
Posted by Dirk Frederickx <di...@gmail.com>.
Janne,
Yep, you are right. I'll correct the LICENSE file. Sorry.
===========
All,
custom_rhino.jar is still mentioned in the LICENSE file.
I recall it was introduced to compress the js files by the DOJO compressor.
However, we switched to the YUI compressor which also compresses CSS.
Can somebody check/confirm whether it is save to remove this JAR .
dirk