You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by jidanni <ji...@jidanni.org> on 2011/02/18 23:28:51 UTC
My messages never got to this list, even though I'm subscribed etc.
My recent messages never got to this list, even though I'm subscribed etc.
Could it be it thinks they are ... spam?
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/My-messages-never-got-to-this-list%2C-even-though-I%27m-subscribed-etc.-tp30962942p30962942.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: My messages never got to this list, even though I'm subscribed etc.
Posted by ji...@jidanni.org.
>>>>> "j" == jidanni <ji...@jidanni.org> writes:
j> Well let's see if at least this reply gets through without needing to
j> resort to Nabble.
OK, it got through. ANOTHER_JIDANNI_STUPID_POST did not fire ☺
Re: My messages never got to this list, even though I'm subscribed etc.
Posted by ji...@jidanni.org.
Well let's see if at least this reply gets through without needing to
resort to Nabble.
Re: My messages never got to this list, even though I'm subscribed
etc.
Posted by Karsten Bräckelmann <gu...@rudersport.de>.
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 14:49 -0800, John Hardin wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Feb 2011, jidanni wrote:
>
> > My recent messages never got to this list, even though I'm subscribed
> > etc. Could it be it thinks they are ... spam?
Possible -- did you by chance include URIs in your recent attempts to
post, that happen to be black listed by URI DNSBLs?
I believe mail never is silently discarded by the list server, but SMTP
rejected if it exceeds a certain SA threshold. You should check if you
missed the reject message generated by your own MTA.
(If you actually put content like the above in your post, like black
listed URIs -- what would *your* MTA do with that mail, if it finds the
same content!?)
> Or maybe the Nabble -> SA glue was temporarily broken for some reason.
>
> We aren't going to troubleshoot Nabble for you. Post directly to the list.
He didn't use Nabble in the past, so I'd assume he used it this time, to
actually ask the very question he did ask -- given the question, sending
a mail directly is not an option. :)
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
Re: My messages never got to this list, even though I'm subscribed
etc.
Posted by John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org>.
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011, jidanni wrote:
> My recent messages never got to this list, even though I'm subscribed
> etc. Could it be it thinks they are ... spam?
Or maybe the Nabble -> SA glue was temporarily broken for some reason.
We aren't going to troubleshoot Nabble for you. Post directly to the list.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bipartisanship (n): Shut up about your principles and vote the way
the President tells you to!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
4 days until George Washington's 279th Birthday