You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to bugs@httpd.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2008/07/31 12:29:06 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45512] New: Bad Performance of mod_proxy with SSL on Solaris 10

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45512

           Summary: Bad Performance of mod_proxy with SSL on Solaris 10
           Product: Apache httpd-2
           Version: 2.2.9
          Platform: Sun
        OS/Version: SunOS
            Status: NEW
          Severity: major
          Priority: P2
         Component: mod_proxy
        AssignedTo: bugs@httpd.apache.org
        ReportedBy: mkjordi@gmail.com


Created an attachment (id=22335)
 --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22335)
sample configuration for reproducing the problem

within the migration of our reverse proxy from apache 2.0 to apache 2.2 on
solaris 10 we detected a big perfomance difference. with the same configuration
of mod_proxy with ssl between proxy and application server requests need 2 to 3
times longer with apache 2.2 as with apache 2.0. i installed also apache 2.2 on
windows and linux with the same proxy configuration and i could not reproduce
the problem.

it seems to me there is a problem of apache 2.2 mod_proxy with ssl on solaris
10. we reproduced the problem on sparc and amd machines.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45512] Bad Performance of mod_proxy with SSL on Solaris 10

Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45512


Markus Jordi <mk...@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEEDINFO                    |ASSIGNED




--- Comment #5 from Markus Jordi <mk...@gmail.com>  2008-08-25 01:47:38 PST ---
i did some tests with static content. the perfomance is good with and without
ssl. the problem only exists if we connect with ssl from the proxy to the
application server.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45512] Bad Performance of mod_proxy with SSL on Solaris 10

Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45512


Ruediger Pluem <rp...@apache.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |NEEDINFO




--- Comment #1 from Ruediger Pluem <rp...@apache.org>  2008-07-31 08:20:35 PST ---
Do you have the same problem when serving static files via SSL on Solaris 10?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45512] Bad Performance of mod_proxy with SSL on Solaris 10

Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45512





--- Comment #3 from Markus Jordi <mk...@gmail.com>  2008-08-01 02:18:34 PST ---
we tried different combinations of openssl and apache, selfcompiled and
distributed by sun. the used versions of openssl are 0.9.8g/h.

i didn't try static content explicit and will do this test on monday.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45512] Bad Performance of mod_proxy with SSL on Solaris 10

Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45512





--- Comment #4 from Markus Jordi <mk...@gmail.com>  2008-08-04 00:19:41 PST ---
i did some tests with static content. the perfomance is good with and without
ssl. the problem only exists if we connect with ssl from the proxy to the
application server.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45512] Bad Performance of mod_proxy with SSL on Solaris 10

Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45512





--- Comment #2 from Ruediger Pluem <rp...@apache.org>  2008-07-31 08:26:18 PST ---
What version of openssl do you use on Solaris 10? Is it supplied by Sun?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org