You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@jmeter.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2014/02/07 18:08:16 UTC
[Bug 56118] New: File uploads fail every other attempt using timers
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56118
Bug ID: 56118
Summary: File uploads fail every other attempt using timers
Product: JMeter
Version: 2.11
Hardware: Macintosh
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: Main
Assignee: issues@jmeter.apache.org
Reporter: oliver_lloyd@hotmail.com
Created attachment 31291
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31291&action=edit
problem jmx
This is a fairly impossible problem but I thought I'd raise it in case it
supports something you've already seem.
In the attached plan, if I run it without a timer it is successful for each
request. However, if I enable the timer the the first upload request works but
the second fails, then the third works, and the forth fails, etc...
The only difference is enabling and disabling the timer.
Unfortunately, I can't actually give you a working jmx - the attached will
always fail but hopefully it is still useful.
Failure is:
org.apache.http.NoHttpResponseException: The target server failed to respond
Success:
204 - blank response
The type of timer makes no difference.
The value in the timer DOES make a difference. 100ms and + = problem, 30ms = no
problem.
The request I am making to S3 is valid, were it not I would get an error
response. In this case I get NoHTTPResponse.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 56118] File uploads fail every other attempt using timers
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56118
Philippe Mouawad <p....@ubik-ingenierie.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |p.mouawad@ubik-ingenierie.c
| |om
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
OS| |All
--- Comment #1 from Philippe Mouawad <p....@ubik-ingenierie.com> ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 56119 ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.