Re: [Roller-development] Re: Roller 1.2 tagged

[Allen Gilliland <Al...@Sun.COM>]

i agree.  we can wait another day or two to make sure the release really is final.

-- Allen


On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 08:06, Matt Raible wrote:
> In my experience with AppFuse, I've sometimes found minor issues in
> the release - and had to re-tag and re-release a day or two after the
> initial release.  I'd advocate releasing from java.net, waiting a day
> or two to confirm that the release is solid, and then moving to
> subversion.
> 
> Matt
> 
> On 6/20/05, Dave Johnson <da...@rollerweblogger.org> wrote:
> > I just created these tags on Roller's CVS HEAD:
> > 
> >     ROLLER_1_2_RELEASE
> >     ROLLER_1_2_RELEASE_BRANCH
> > 
> > I also deployed the latest code to my personal site and an internal
> > staging site for final testing.
> > 
> > Before I cut the final release, I'd like to move to Subversion. Are we
> > ready for that?
> > 
> > - Dave
> > 
> >
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
> from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
> informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
> speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&opclick
> _______________________________________________
> Roller-development mailing list
> Roller-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/roller-development