You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Nate Edel (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/12/02 20:38:11 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-11843) MapReduce classes shouldn't be in
hbase-server
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15036441#comment-15036441 ]
Nate Edel commented on HBASE-11843:
-----------------------------------
This is looking bigger, and probably difficult to review especially coming from a relative newb. I've broken things up into subtasks, and this should be easier to review.
> MapReduce classes shouldn't be in hbase-server
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-11843
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11843
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: build
> Reporter: Keegan Witt
> Assignee: Nate Edel
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> I'm opening this to continue the discussion I started a while back: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hbase-user/201405.mbox/%3CCAMUu0w_XooxeG779rRFjTuRAU+UxeAvuNzxKw9dxFO-gh5yVUw@mail.gmail.com%3E.
> To summarize, I think the MapReduce classes used by clients (like TableMapper, TableReducer, etc) don't belong in hbase-server. This forces the user to pull in a rather large artifact for a relatively small number of classes. These should either be put in hbase-client, or possibly an artifact of their own (like the hbase-mapreduce idea Enis suggested).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)