You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com> on 2010/10/03 21:03:25 UTC
Re: svn commit: r1004003 - /subversion/site/publish/index.html
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 13:12, <st...@apache.org> wrote:
> Author: stsp
> Date: Sun Oct 3 17:12:19 2010
> New Revision: 1004003
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1004003&view=rev
> Log:
> * site/publish/index.html: Fix 1.6.13 release date, here, too.
> (Why are news items maintained in two separate places?)
The intent is for index.html to have just two or three recent items,
and news.html to be the full archive.
Cheers,
-g
Re: svn commit: r1004003 - /subversion/site/publish/index.html
Posted by Mark Phippard <ma...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Mark Phippard <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If we provided an RSS feed for our news items, which would be a good
> idea but yet more work, than we could use something like this to
> easily pull the most recent news items into the homepage:
>
> http://feed2js.org/
>
> Maybe we could just make a handcrafted RSS feed for our news items,
> and then use this JavaScript to populate both the home page and the
> news page? Then we would only have a single news source to maintain,
> the RSS feed.
Actually an RSS feed that did not have items to link to would be kind
of pointless.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
Re: svn commit: r1004003 - /subversion/site/publish/index.html
Posted by Mark Phippard <ma...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Stefan Sperling <st...@elego.de> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 05:03:25PM -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 13:12, <st...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > Author: stsp
>> > Date: Sun Oct 3 17:12:19 2010
>> > New Revision: 1004003
>> >
>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1004003&view=rev
>> > Log:
>> > * site/publish/index.html: Fix 1.6.13 release date, here, too.
>> > (Why are news items maintained in two separate places?)
>>
>> The intent is for index.html to have just two or three recent items,
>> and news.html to be the full archive.
>
> And there's no html foo that can automate this for us?
> But, well, it's not a big deal.
If we provided an RSS feed for our news items, which would be a good
idea but yet more work, than we could use something like this to
easily pull the most recent news items into the homepage:
http://feed2js.org/
Maybe we could just make a handcrafted RSS feed for our news items,
and then use this JavaScript to populate both the home page and the
news page? Then we would only have a single news source to maintain,
the RSS feed.
Just a thought.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
Re: svn commit: r1004003 - /subversion/site/publish/index.html
Posted by Stefan Sperling <st...@elego.de>.
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 05:03:25PM -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 13:12, <st...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Author: stsp
> > Date: Sun Oct 3 17:12:19 2010
> > New Revision: 1004003
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1004003&view=rev
> > Log:
> > * site/publish/index.html: Fix 1.6.13 release date, here, too.
> > (Why are news items maintained in two separate places?)
>
> The intent is for index.html to have just two or three recent items,
> and news.html to be the full archive.
And there's no html foo that can automate this for us?
But, well, it's not a big deal.
Re: svn commit: r1004003 - /subversion/site/publish/index.html
Posted by Stefan Sperling <st...@elego.de>.
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 05:03:25PM -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 13:12, <st...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Author: stsp
> > Date: Sun Oct 3 17:12:19 2010
> > New Revision: 1004003
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1004003&view=rev
> > Log:
> > * site/publish/index.html: Fix 1.6.13 release date, here, too.
> > (Why are news items maintained in two separate places?)
>
> The intent is for index.html to have just two or three recent items,
> and news.html to be the full archive.
And there's no html foo that can automate this for us?
But, well, it's not a big deal.