You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2005/10/01 02:10:46 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36876] - [digester] Remove dependence on Commons collection ArrayStack

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36876>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36876


skitching@apache.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX




------- Additional Comments From skitching@apache.org  2005-10-01 02:10 -------
Unfortunately the ArrayStack class was exposed as a protected member in Digester
classes. This means it isn't possible to substitute some other implementation
(even a byte-for-byte equivalent) without causing a binary incompatibility.

As BeanUtils also faced this issue, the solution chosen was to include class
org.apache.commons.collections.ArrayStack in the BeanUtils 1.7 jar. This is a
little ugly, but the ArrayStack class is extremely stable.

So as described in the digester page, when using BeanUtils 1.7 with Digester you
don't need to have commons-collections.jar present.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org