You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@community.apache.org by Hervé BOUTEMY <he...@free.fr> on 2015/07/01 08:02:13 UTC
Re: Reporter.apache.org displaying incorrect data - who is responsible for the host?
I asked about it one week ago (with analysis of the VM state), but got no
answer.
Seems the only one to know is Daniel, and he doesn't check this ML or doesn't
have time.
I have access to the VM: it was given for projects-new.
Technically, I can change reporter too, but since we're starting from an
unexpected status (no svn checkout, files on the VM that are not part of svn),
I didn't want to change the VM content without asking before.
At the moment, I want to finish projects new switch: then I'll probably have
more time to help on reporter.
Regards,
Hervé
Le mardi 30 juin 2015 01:20:46 sebb a écrit :
> Reporter.apache.org is showing misleading PMC membership data.
>
> As this is used in board reports, it really ought to be fixed ASAP.
>
> However the fixes I made to SVN have not been applied, and there is no
> documentation I could find on how the host has been set up - nor how
> the faulty data is generated.
>
> Who is responsible for maintaining the host and updating the software on it?
Re: Reporter.apache.org displaying incorrect data - who is
responsible for the host?
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 1 July 2015 at 21:59, Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 07/01/2015 04:56 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> On 1 July 2015 at 11:21, Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> My time devoted to comdev is unfortunately limited right now, but I will
>>> state a few things:
>>>
>>> - reporter.apache.org runs on the comdev VM (projects-vm).
>>> - Anyone in the comdev project/PMC can access this machine.
>>> - reporter.apache.org is still considered a 'pet project'. It is not an
>>> official Apache service, it is not maintained by infra, it's a personal
>>> thing I put together to help out projects. It was donated to comdev
>>> because
>>> infra - while supportive of the project - did not want to manage it. If
>>
>>
>> However it has been recommended several times (by some board members,
>> IIRC) as a way of providing the basic information needed for a board
>> report.
>
>
>
> Well, yes, but that's always been accompanied by "it's not official, it's
> error-prone, it's only a starting place, blah blah"
>
> Daniel did this on his own time. It is not an infra-supported service. If
> it's useful, great. If it's not, you're welcome to try to fix it.
>
>
>> That's fair enough, but then the text needs to make clear what the
>> limitations are.
>>
>> At present AFAICT it relies on people.a.o, which is not the canonical
>> source for PMC membership or project membership.
>> Also if people.a.o fails to run for a day or so (which can and has
>> happened), the dates of LDAP group changes may be incorrect.
>
>
> At the risk of sounding like a jerk ...
>
> It's in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/comdev/reporter.apache.org and
> patches are gleefully welcomed.
I know.
However only part of the code is in SVN at that location, and it has
as yet no documentation apart from a very basic start.
The service also depends on crontabs (I assume; I've not yet
investigated) and httpd.conf (which I have found in SVN) in order to
make sensible patches possible.
And unlike projects-new, someone needs to login to update the code
from SVN when patches are to be applied.
> --Rich
>
>
> --
> Rich Bowen - rbowen@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
> http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
Re: Reporter.apache.org displaying incorrect data - who is responsible
for the host?
Posted by Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com>.
On 07/01/2015 04:56 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 1 July 2015 at 11:21, Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
>> My time devoted to comdev is unfortunately limited right now, but I will
>> state a few things:
>>
>> - reporter.apache.org runs on the comdev VM (projects-vm).
>> - Anyone in the comdev project/PMC can access this machine.
>> - reporter.apache.org is still considered a 'pet project'. It is not an
>> official Apache service, it is not maintained by infra, it's a personal
>> thing I put together to help out projects. It was donated to comdev because
>> infra - while supportive of the project - did not want to manage it. If
>
> However it has been recommended several times (by some board members,
> IIRC) as a way of providing the basic information needed for a board
> report.
Well, yes, but that's always been accompanied by "it's not official,
it's error-prone, it's only a starting place, blah blah"
Daniel did this on his own time. It is not an infra-supported service.
If it's useful, great. If it's not, you're welcome to try to fix it.
> That's fair enough, but then the text needs to make clear what the
> limitations are.
>
> At present AFAICT it relies on people.a.o, which is not the canonical
> source for PMC membership or project membership.
> Also if people.a.o fails to run for a day or so (which can and has
> happened), the dates of LDAP group changes may be incorrect.
At the risk of sounding like a jerk ...
It's in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/comdev/reporter.apache.org and
patches are gleefully welcomed.
--Rich
--
Rich Bowen - rbowen@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
Re: Reporter.apache.org displaying incorrect data - who is
responsible for the host?
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 1 July 2015 at 11:21, Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
> My time devoted to comdev is unfortunately limited right now, but I will
> state a few things:
>
> - reporter.apache.org runs on the comdev VM (projects-vm).
> - Anyone in the comdev project/PMC can access this machine.
> - reporter.apache.org is still considered a 'pet project'. It is not an
> official Apache service, it is not maintained by infra, it's a personal
> thing I put together to help out projects. It was donated to comdev because
> infra - while supportive of the project - did not want to manage it. If
However it has been recommended several times (by some board members,
IIRC) as a way of providing the basic information needed for a board
report.
> anyone is interesting in moving it to a more official (maintainable) state,
> then by all means do so.
> - The service is fully automated, which is one of the reasons it uses
> publicly available information rather than committee information that is not
> publicly available. Using the committee info file would require yet another
> svn role account. I'm not saying it's impossible, but it would require some
> additional work.
That's fair enough, but then the text needs to make clear what the
limitations are.
At present AFAICT it relies on people.a.o, which is not the canonical
source for PMC membership or project membership.
Also if people.a.o fails to run for a day or so (which can and has
happened), the dates of LDAP group changes may be incorrect.
> With regards,
> Daniel.
>
>
> On 2015-07-01 08:02, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
>>
>> I asked about it one week ago (with analysis of the VM state), but got no
>> answer.
>> Seems the only one to know is Daniel, and he doesn't check this ML or
>> doesn't
>> have time.
>>
>> I have access to the VM: it was given for projects-new.
>> Technically, I can change reporter too, but since we're starting from an
>> unexpected status (no svn checkout, files on the VM that are not part of
>> svn),
>> I didn't want to change the VM content without asking before.
>>
>>
>> At the moment, I want to finish projects new switch: then I'll probably
>> have
>> more time to help on reporter.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hervé
>>
>> Le mardi 30 juin 2015 01:20:46 sebb a écrit :
>>>
>>> Reporter.apache.org is showing misleading PMC membership data.
>>>
>>> As this is used in board reports, it really ought to be fixed ASAP.
>>>
>>> However the fixes I made to SVN have not been applied, and there is no
>>> documentation I could find on how the host has been set up - nor how
>>> the faulty data is generated.
>>>
>>> Who is responsible for maintaining the host and updating the software on
>>> it?
>
>
Re: Reporter.apache.org displaying incorrect data - who is responsible
for the host?
Posted by Daniel Gruno <hu...@apache.org>.
My time devoted to comdev is unfortunately limited right now, but I will
state a few things:
- reporter.apache.org runs on the comdev VM (projects-vm).
- Anyone in the comdev project/PMC can access this machine.
- reporter.apache.org is still considered a 'pet project'. It is not an
official Apache service, it is not maintained by infra, it's a personal
thing I put together to help out projects. It was donated to comdev
because infra - while supportive of the project - did not want to manage
it. If anyone is interesting in moving it to a more official
(maintainable) state, then by all means do so.
- The service is fully automated, which is one of the reasons it uses
publicly available information rather than committee information that is
not publicly available. Using the committee info file would require yet
another svn role account. I'm not saying it's impossible, but it would
require some additional work.
With regards,
Daniel.
On 2015-07-01 08:02, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> I asked about it one week ago (with analysis of the VM state), but got no
> answer.
> Seems the only one to know is Daniel, and he doesn't check this ML or doesn't
> have time.
>
> I have access to the VM: it was given for projects-new.
> Technically, I can change reporter too, but since we're starting from an
> unexpected status (no svn checkout, files on the VM that are not part of svn),
> I didn't want to change the VM content without asking before.
>
>
> At the moment, I want to finish projects new switch: then I'll probably have
> more time to help on reporter.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> Le mardi 30 juin 2015 01:20:46 sebb a écrit :
>> Reporter.apache.org is showing misleading PMC membership data.
>>
>> As this is used in board reports, it really ought to be fixed ASAP.
>>
>> However the fixes I made to SVN have not been applied, and there is no
>> documentation I could find on how the host has been set up - nor how
>> the faulty data is generated.
>>
>> Who is responsible for maintaining the host and updating the software on it?
Re: Reporter.apache.org displaying incorrect data - who is
responsible for the host?
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 10 July 2015 at 04:30, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 7:38 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 9 July 2015 at 22:20, Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I noticed that the new reporter output now contains "LDAP" in a way
>>>> that makes it sound like "LDAP" is the project name. Is this
>>>> intentional? It seems awkward and unnecessary to have "LDAP" in
>>>> there instead of "PMC", and when I read the first report containing
>>>> that verbiage, I thought there was was copy&paste error in the report.
>>>
>>> As I read through the previous emails in the thread, I'm pretty sure
>>> it was intentional.
>>> My opinion is that it would be far more readable to state it like this:
>>>
>>> ==============
>>> ## PMC/Committership changes (from LDAP):
>>
>> Perhaps, but PMC membership is not governed by LDAP committee group changes
>> It is not unknown for the LDAP group to be updated a long while before
>> (or after) the PMC membership changes (indicated by updating the
>> committee-info.txt file).
>> A person may be on the PMC but not in LDAP and vice versa.
>>
>> Therefore it is wrong for the site to equate the two.
>>
>
> The above is strictly true, however, being in LDAP results in being
> granted the karma for several things that a PMC member might need
> (mail-search karma for a project, access to the projects private svn
> tree, etc)
> I don't think that the reporter site is looking to be a canonical
> source of truth, so perhaps LDAP records are close enough.
Note that the Marvin bot unconditionally recommends using reporter.apache.org:
"Chairs may use the Apache Reporter Service [3] to help them compile and
submit a board report."
I think it's important chairs know what sources are used by reporter.
Note: if read access were granted to committee-info.txt as per
INFRA-9942, then reporter.a.o could accurately report PMC membership;
there would be no need to make assumptions about the LDAP committee
groups.
> Particularly since a committer account is LDAP based, so looking at a
> single source of information for both PMC and committer stats, even if
> not necessarily the canonical source of that information, seems at
> least pragmatic, even though there is a chance of inaccuracy.
>> [I am hopeful that the site will be able to use the correct source
>> data eventually, but that is waiting on getting suitable access
>> rights]
>>
>> There is a separate issue which is that not all PMCs equate committers
>> with LDAP. For example, Subversion and Commons allow any ASF committer
>> to update their SVN tree, so they don't maintain the group.
>> Furthermore, I'm not sure the LDAP unix groups are used for Git-based projects.
>>
>
> LDAP groups are used exclusively for git.
> svn is a good deal more flexible from a permissions perspective.
>
>
>>> - Currently 76 committers and 39 PMC members in the project.
>>> - Hazem Saleh was added to the PMC on Fri May 15 2015
>>> - New commmitters:
>>> - Bill Lucy was added as a committer on Tue Jun 23 2015
>>> - Ross Clewley was added as a committer on Mon May 18 2015
>>> - Thomas Andraschko was added as a committer on Thu Jul 02 2015
>>> - Dennis Kieselhorst was added as a committer on Mon May 11 2015
>>> ==============
Re: Reporter.apache.org displaying incorrect data - who is
responsible for the host?
Posted by David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us>.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 7:38 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9 July 2015 at 22:20, Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I noticed that the new reporter output now contains "LDAP" in a way
>>> that makes it sound like "LDAP" is the project name. Is this
>>> intentional? It seems awkward and unnecessary to have "LDAP" in
>>> there instead of "PMC", and when I read the first report containing
>>> that verbiage, I thought there was was copy&paste error in the report.
>>
>> As I read through the previous emails in the thread, I'm pretty sure
>> it was intentional.
>> My opinion is that it would be far more readable to state it like this:
>>
>> ==============
>> ## PMC/Committership changes (from LDAP):
>
> Perhaps, but PMC membership is not governed by LDAP committee group changes
> It is not unknown for the LDAP group to be updated a long while before
> (or after) the PMC membership changes (indicated by updating the
> committee-info.txt file).
> A person may be on the PMC but not in LDAP and vice versa.
>
> Therefore it is wrong for the site to equate the two.
>
The above is strictly true, however, being in LDAP results in being
granted the karma for several things that a PMC member might need
(mail-search karma for a project, access to the projects private svn
tree, etc)
I don't think that the reporter site is looking to be a canonical
source of truth, so perhaps LDAP records are close enough.
Particularly since a committer account is LDAP based, so looking at a
single source of information for both PMC and committer stats, even if
not necessarily the canonical source of that information, seems at
least pragmatic, even though there is a chance of inaccuracy.
> [I am hopeful that the site will be able to use the correct source
> data eventually, but that is waiting on getting suitable access
> rights]
>
> There is a separate issue which is that not all PMCs equate committers
> with LDAP. For example, Subversion and Commons allow any ASF committer
> to update their SVN tree, so they don't maintain the group.
> Furthermore, I'm not sure the LDAP unix groups are used for Git-based projects.
>
LDAP groups are used exclusively for git.
svn is a good deal more flexible from a permissions perspective.
>> - Currently 76 committers and 39 PMC members in the project.
>> - Hazem Saleh was added to the PMC on Fri May 15 2015
>> - New commmitters:
>> - Bill Lucy was added as a committer on Tue Jun 23 2015
>> - Ross Clewley was added as a committer on Mon May 18 2015
>> - Thomas Andraschko was added as a committer on Thu Jul 02 2015
>> - Dennis Kieselhorst was added as a committer on Mon May 11 2015
>> ==============
Re: Reporter.apache.org displaying incorrect data - who is
responsible for the host?
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 9 July 2015 at 22:20, Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I noticed that the new reporter output now contains "LDAP" in a way
>> that makes it sound like "LDAP" is the project name. Is this
>> intentional? It seems awkward and unnecessary to have "LDAP" in
>> there instead of "PMC", and when I read the first report containing
>> that verbiage, I thought there was was copy&paste error in the report.
>
> As I read through the previous emails in the thread, I'm pretty sure
> it was intentional.
> My opinion is that it would be far more readable to state it like this:
>
> ==============
> ## PMC/Committership changes (from LDAP):
Perhaps, but PMC membership is not governed by LDAP committee group changes
It is not unknown for the LDAP group to be updated a long while before
(or after) the PMC membership changes (indicated by updating the
committee-info.txt file).
A person may be on the PMC but not in LDAP and vice versa.
Therefore it is wrong for the site to equate the two.
[I am hopeful that the site will be able to use the correct source
data eventually, but that is waiting on getting suitable access
rights]
There is a separate issue which is that not all PMCs equate committers
with LDAP. For example, Subversion and Commons allow any ASF committer
to update their SVN tree, so they don't maintain the group.
Furthermore, I'm not sure the LDAP unix groups are used for Git-based projects.
> - Currently 76 committers and 39 PMC members in the project.
> - Hazem Saleh was added to the PMC on Fri May 15 2015
> - New commmitters:
> - Bill Lucy was added as a committer on Tue Jun 23 2015
> - Ross Clewley was added as a committer on Mon May 18 2015
> - Thomas Andraschko was added as a committer on Thu Jul 02 2015
> - Dennis Kieselhorst was added as a committer on Mon May 11 2015
> ==============
Re: Reporter.apache.org displaying incorrect data - who is
responsible for the host?
Posted by Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I noticed that the new reporter output now contains "LDAP" in a way
> that makes it sound like "LDAP" is the project name. Is this
> intentional? It seems awkward and unnecessary to have "LDAP" in
> there instead of "PMC", and when I read the first report containing
> that verbiage, I thought there was was copy&paste error in the report.
As I read through the previous emails in the thread, I'm pretty sure
it was intentional.
My opinion is that it would be far more readable to state it like this:
==============
## PMC/Committership changes (from LDAP):
- Currently 76 committers and 39 PMC members in the project.
- Hazem Saleh was added to the PMC on Fri May 15 2015
- New commmitters:
- Bill Lucy was added as a committer on Tue Jun 23 2015
- Ross Clewley was added as a committer on Mon May 18 2015
- Thomas Andraschko was added as a committer on Thu Jul 02 2015
- Dennis Kieselhorst was added as a committer on Mon May 11 2015
==============
Re: Reporter.apache.org displaying incorrect data - who is
responsible for the host?
Posted by Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com>.
I noticed that the new reporter output now contains "LDAP" in a way
that makes it sound like "LDAP" is the project name. Is this
intentional? It seems awkward and unnecessary to have "LDAP" in
there instead of "PMC", and when I read the first report containing
that verbiage, I thought there was was copy&paste error in the report.
=============
LDAP committee/Committership changes
Changes within the last 3 months:
→ Hazem Saleh was added to the LDAP committee on Fri May 15 2015
→ Latest LDAP committee addition: Fri May 15 2015 (Hazem Saleh)
→ Bill Lucy was added as a committer on Tue Jun 23 2015
→ Ross Clewley was added as a committer on Mon May 18 2015
→ Thomas Andraschko was added as a committer on Thu Jul 02 2015
→ Dennis Kieselhorst was added as a committer on Mon May 11 2015
→ Latest committer addition: Thu Jul 02 2015 (Thomas Andraschko)
→ Currently 76 committers and 39 LDAP committee members.
==============
When I ran my report earlier, it said:
==============
## PMC/Committership changes:
- Currently 76 committers and 39 PMC members in the project.
- Hazem Saleh was added to the PMC on Fri May 15 2015
- New commmitters:
- Bill Lucy was added as a committer on Tue Jun 23 2015
- Ross Clewley was added as a committer on Mon May 18 2015
- Thomas Andraschko was added as a committer on Thu Jul 02 2015
- Dennis Kieselhorst was added as a committer on Mon May 11 2015
==============
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 4:47 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2 July 2015 at 07:22, Hervé BOUTEMY <he...@free.fr> wrote:
>> Le mercredi 1 juillet 2015 09:10:42 sebb a écrit :
>>> On 1 July 2015 at 07:02, Hervé BOUTEMY <he...@free.fr> wrote:
>>> > I asked about it one week ago (with analysis of the VM state), but got no
>>> > answer.
>>> > Seems the only one to know is Daniel, and he doesn't check this ML or
>>> > doesn't have time.
>>> >
>>> > I have access to the VM: it was given for projects-new.
>>> > Technically, I can change reporter too, but since we're starting from an
>>> > unexpected status (no svn checkout, files on the VM that are not part of
>>> > svn),
>>> If you can create a copy of the files on the VM I could ensure any
>>> local changes are reflected in SVN.
>> dump available in people.apache.org:/home/hboutemy/reporter.apache.org.tgz
>>
>>> It would help also to have details of the crontab entries.
>> # m h dom mon dow command
>> 00 00 * * * cd /var/www/projects.apache.org/scripts/cronjobs && python3.4
>> podlings.py
>> 00 00 * * * cd /var/www/projects.apache.org/scripts/cronjobs && python3.4
>> parsecommitters.py
>> 00 00 * * * cd /var/www/projects.apache.org/scripts/cronjobs && python3.4
>> parsechairs.py
>> 00 00 * * * cd /var/www/projects.apache.org/scripts/cronjobs && python3.4
>> countaccounts.py
>> 00 00 * * * cd /var/www/projects.apache.org/scripts/cronjobs && python3.4
>> parsereleases.py
>> 00 4,12,20 * * * cd /var/www/reporter.apache.org/data && python3.4
>> parsepmcs.py
>> 00 01 * * * cd /var/www/reporter.apache.org/ && python mailglomper.py
>> 00 09 * * * cd /var/www/reporter.apache.org/ && python readjira.py
>> 00 12 * * * curl "(removed)" >
>> /var/www/reporter.apache.org/data/mailinglists.json
>>
>>
>>
>> once content is checked against waht is in svn, we could probably copy and run
>> pubsubber.py from projects.a.o so svn updates are propagated to the vm
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> I have now been given access as well, once I set up OPIE.
>
> I hope to find some time soon to synch. the on disk changes.
> Then we can look at improvements.
>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hervé
>>
>>>
>>> > I didn't want to change the VM content without asking before.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > At the moment, I want to finish projects new switch: then I'll probably
>>> > have more time to help on reporter.
>>> >
>>> > Regards,
>>> >
>>> > Hervé
>>> >
>>> > Le mardi 30 juin 2015 01:20:46 sebb a écrit :
>>> >> Reporter.apache.org is showing misleading PMC membership data.
>>> >>
>>> >> As this is used in board reports, it really ought to be fixed ASAP.
>>> >>
>>> >> However the fixes I made to SVN have not been applied, and there is no
>>> >> documentation I could find on how the host has been set up - nor how
>>> >> the faulty data is generated.
>>> >>
>>> >> Who is responsible for maintaining the host and updating the software on
>>> >> it?
>>
Re: Reporter.apache.org displaying incorrect data - who is
responsible for the host?
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 2 July 2015 at 07:22, Hervé BOUTEMY <he...@free.fr> wrote:
> Le mercredi 1 juillet 2015 09:10:42 sebb a écrit :
>> On 1 July 2015 at 07:02, Hervé BOUTEMY <he...@free.fr> wrote:
>> > I asked about it one week ago (with analysis of the VM state), but got no
>> > answer.
>> > Seems the only one to know is Daniel, and he doesn't check this ML or
>> > doesn't have time.
>> >
>> > I have access to the VM: it was given for projects-new.
>> > Technically, I can change reporter too, but since we're starting from an
>> > unexpected status (no svn checkout, files on the VM that are not part of
>> > svn),
>> If you can create a copy of the files on the VM I could ensure any
>> local changes are reflected in SVN.
> dump available in people.apache.org:/home/hboutemy/reporter.apache.org.tgz
>
>> It would help also to have details of the crontab entries.
> # m h dom mon dow command
> 00 00 * * * cd /var/www/projects.apache.org/scripts/cronjobs && python3.4
> podlings.py
> 00 00 * * * cd /var/www/projects.apache.org/scripts/cronjobs && python3.4
> parsecommitters.py
> 00 00 * * * cd /var/www/projects.apache.org/scripts/cronjobs && python3.4
> parsechairs.py
> 00 00 * * * cd /var/www/projects.apache.org/scripts/cronjobs && python3.4
> countaccounts.py
> 00 00 * * * cd /var/www/projects.apache.org/scripts/cronjobs && python3.4
> parsereleases.py
> 00 4,12,20 * * * cd /var/www/reporter.apache.org/data && python3.4
> parsepmcs.py
> 00 01 * * * cd /var/www/reporter.apache.org/ && python mailglomper.py
> 00 09 * * * cd /var/www/reporter.apache.org/ && python readjira.py
> 00 12 * * * curl "(removed)" >
> /var/www/reporter.apache.org/data/mailinglists.json
>
>
>
> once content is checked against waht is in svn, we could probably copy and run
> pubsubber.py from projects.a.o so svn updates are propagated to the vm
Thanks a lot.
I have now been given access as well, once I set up OPIE.
I hope to find some time soon to synch. the on disk changes.
Then we can look at improvements.
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
>>
>> > I didn't want to change the VM content without asking before.
>> >
>> >
>> > At the moment, I want to finish projects new switch: then I'll probably
>> > have more time to help on reporter.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Hervé
>> >
>> > Le mardi 30 juin 2015 01:20:46 sebb a écrit :
>> >> Reporter.apache.org is showing misleading PMC membership data.
>> >>
>> >> As this is used in board reports, it really ought to be fixed ASAP.
>> >>
>> >> However the fixes I made to SVN have not been applied, and there is no
>> >> documentation I could find on how the host has been set up - nor how
>> >> the faulty data is generated.
>> >>
>> >> Who is responsible for maintaining the host and updating the software on
>> >> it?
>
Re: Reporter.apache.org displaying incorrect data - who is responsible for the host?
Posted by Hervé BOUTEMY <he...@free.fr>.
Le mercredi 1 juillet 2015 09:10:42 sebb a écrit :
> On 1 July 2015 at 07:02, Hervé BOUTEMY <he...@free.fr> wrote:
> > I asked about it one week ago (with analysis of the VM state), but got no
> > answer.
> > Seems the only one to know is Daniel, and he doesn't check this ML or
> > doesn't have time.
> >
> > I have access to the VM: it was given for projects-new.
> > Technically, I can change reporter too, but since we're starting from an
> > unexpected status (no svn checkout, files on the VM that are not part of
> > svn),
> If you can create a copy of the files on the VM I could ensure any
> local changes are reflected in SVN.
dump available in people.apache.org:/home/hboutemy/reporter.apache.org.tgz
> It would help also to have details of the crontab entries.
# m h dom mon dow command
00 00 * * * cd /var/www/projects.apache.org/scripts/cronjobs && python3.4
podlings.py
00 00 * * * cd /var/www/projects.apache.org/scripts/cronjobs && python3.4
parsecommitters.py
00 00 * * * cd /var/www/projects.apache.org/scripts/cronjobs && python3.4
parsechairs.py
00 00 * * * cd /var/www/projects.apache.org/scripts/cronjobs && python3.4
countaccounts.py
00 00 * * * cd /var/www/projects.apache.org/scripts/cronjobs && python3.4
parsereleases.py
00 4,12,20 * * * cd /var/www/reporter.apache.org/data && python3.4
parsepmcs.py
00 01 * * * cd /var/www/reporter.apache.org/ && python mailglomper.py
00 09 * * * cd /var/www/reporter.apache.org/ && python readjira.py
00 12 * * * curl "(removed)" >
/var/www/reporter.apache.org/data/mailinglists.json
once content is checked against waht is in svn, we could probably copy and run
pubsubber.py from projects.a.o so svn updates are propagated to the vm
Regards,
Hervé
>
> > I didn't want to change the VM content without asking before.
> >
> >
> > At the moment, I want to finish projects new switch: then I'll probably
> > have more time to help on reporter.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Hervé
> >
> > Le mardi 30 juin 2015 01:20:46 sebb a écrit :
> >> Reporter.apache.org is showing misleading PMC membership data.
> >>
> >> As this is used in board reports, it really ought to be fixed ASAP.
> >>
> >> However the fixes I made to SVN have not been applied, and there is no
> >> documentation I could find on how the host has been set up - nor how
> >> the faulty data is generated.
> >>
> >> Who is responsible for maintaining the host and updating the software on
> >> it?
Re: Reporter.apache.org displaying incorrect data - who is
responsible for the host?
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 1 July 2015 at 07:02, Hervé BOUTEMY <he...@free.fr> wrote:
> I asked about it one week ago (with analysis of the VM state), but got no
> answer.
> Seems the only one to know is Daniel, and he doesn't check this ML or doesn't
> have time.
>
> I have access to the VM: it was given for projects-new.
> Technically, I can change reporter too, but since we're starting from an
> unexpected status (no svn checkout, files on the VM that are not part of svn),
If you can create a copy of the files on the VM I could ensure any
local changes are reflected in SVN.
It would help also to have details of the crontab entries.
> I didn't want to change the VM content without asking before.
>
>
> At the moment, I want to finish projects new switch: then I'll probably have
> more time to help on reporter.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> Le mardi 30 juin 2015 01:20:46 sebb a écrit :
>> Reporter.apache.org is showing misleading PMC membership data.
>>
>> As this is used in board reports, it really ought to be fixed ASAP.
>>
>> However the fixes I made to SVN have not been applied, and there is no
>> documentation I could find on how the host has been set up - nor how
>> the faulty data is generated.
>>
>> Who is responsible for maintaining the host and updating the software on it?
>