You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to legal-discuss@apache.org by "Justin Mclean (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/05/03 02:17:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-566) Clarify use of Apache naming on
incompatible Apache derived licenses
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17338149#comment-17338149 ]
Justin Mclean commented on LEGAL-566:
-------------------------------------
[~bdelacretaz] Any feedback on the above changes?
> Clarify use of Apache naming on incompatible Apache derived licenses
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LEGAL-566
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-566
> Project: Legal Discuss
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Document
> Reporter: Ismaël Mejía
> Priority: Major
>
> We have seen the increase of licenses derived on the Apache license that include words that are incompatible with the original Apache license for example "Apache 2.0 with Commons Clause". LEGAL-402 made Commons Clause part of the Category X licenses so incompatible.
> We should clarify that incompatible changes in terms can no longer be called Apache license.
> [Related discussion on members@ mailing list|https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rec2e597ec347417f9ee3a9de91553c52dbe44b04f5abdb231386c477%40%3Cmembers.apache.org%3E]
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org