[jira] Closed: (DIRMINA-622) Initialise return ByteBuffer from PoolByteBufferAllokator with 0

["Emmanuel Lecharny (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Emmanuel Lecharny closed DIRMINA-622.
-------------------------------------


> Initialise return ByteBuffer from PoolByteBufferAllokator with 0
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DIRMINA-622
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-622
>             Project: MINA
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>    Affects Versions: 1.1.7
>            Reporter: Stefan Gmeiner
>            Assignee: Edouard De Oliveira
>            Priority: Trivial
>             Fix For: 1.1.8
>
>
> A ByteBuffer returned by calling ByteBuffer.allocate() on a PooledByteBufferAllocator is not guarenteed to be initialised to 0 as it would be if a SimpleByteBufferAllocator was used.
> The java equivalent java.nio.ByteBuffers are always initialised with 0 hence the MINA variant should also follow this convention independent if PooledByteBufferAllocator was used or not.
>  
> import org.apache.mina.common.ByteBuffer;
> public class PooledByteBufferTest {
>        public static void main(String[] args) {
>                ByteBuffer.setAllocator(new PooledByteBufferAllocator());
>                ByteBuffer buffer1 = ByteBuffer.allocate(100);
>                System.out.println("buffer1[0]=" + buffer1.getInt(0)); // prints 0
>                buffer1.putInt(42);
>                System.out.println("buffer1[0]=" + buffer1.getInt(0)); // prints 42
>                buffer1.release();
>                ByteBuffer buffer2 = ByteBuffer.allocate(100);
>                System.out.println("buffer1[0]=" + buffer2.getInt(0)); // prints 42 instead of 0
>        }
> }

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.