You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hive.apache.org by "Rui Li (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/07/14 09:22:20 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-14238) Ownership shouldn't be checked if external table location doesn't exist

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-14238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15376649#comment-15376649 ] 

Rui Li commented on HIVE-14238:
-------------------------------

[~thejas], do you think this makes sense?

> Ownership shouldn't be checked if external table location doesn't exist
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-14238
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-14238
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Rui Li
>            Assignee: Rui Li
>
> When creating external table with SQL authorization, we require RWX permission + ownership of the table location. If the location doesn't exist, we check on parent dir (recursively), which means we require the user owns everything under parent dir. I think this is not necessary - we don't have to check ownership of parent dir, or we just check non-recursively.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)