You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@any23.apache.org by Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com> on 2012/04/04 23:45:47 UTC
two cobertura-maven-plugin's for main pom.xml
Hi,
We seem to have two of the above plugin but with different config.
<!-- Test coverage plugin. -->
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
<artifactId>cobertura-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.0</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<goals>
<goal>clean</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<!-- Cobertura report. -->
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
<artifactId>cobertura-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.5.1</version>
</plugin>
Is this OK? If so should they be different versions?
--
*Lewis*
Re: two cobertura-maven-plugin's for main pom.xml
Posted by Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>.
sure, thanks a lot!!!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney
<le...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah that's right.
>
> When you get 2 mins, can you please check out the commit I made last night
> it OK. I've simply made them both the same version, and retained the
> configuration options that were previously there.
>
> Lewis
>
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>wrote:
>
>> Hi Lewis,
>> they should be declared in both build/report sections, right?
>>
>> best,
>> -Simo
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney
>> <le...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > We seem to have two of the above plugin but with different config.
>> >
>> > <!-- Test coverage plugin. -->
>> > <plugin>
>> > <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
>> > <artifactId>cobertura-maven-plugin</artifactId>
>> > <version>2.0</version>
>> > <executions>
>> > <execution>
>> > <goals>
>> > <goal>clean</goal>
>> > </goals>
>> > </execution>
>> > </executions>
>> > </plugin>
>> >
>> > <!-- Cobertura report. -->
>> > <plugin>
>> > <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
>> > <artifactId>cobertura-maven-plugin</artifactId>
>> > <version>2.5.1</version>
>> > </plugin>
>> >
>> > Is this OK? If so should they be different versions?
>> >
>> > --
>> > *Lewis*
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Lewis*
Re: two cobertura-maven-plugin's for main pom.xml
Posted by Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com>.
Yeah that's right.
When you get 2 mins, can you please check out the commit I made last night
it OK. I've simply made them both the same version, and retained the
configuration options that were previously there.
Lewis
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>wrote:
> Hi Lewis,
> they should be declared in both build/report sections, right?
>
> best,
> -Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney
> <le...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We seem to have two of the above plugin but with different config.
> >
> > <!-- Test coverage plugin. -->
> > <plugin>
> > <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
> > <artifactId>cobertura-maven-plugin</artifactId>
> > <version>2.0</version>
> > <executions>
> > <execution>
> > <goals>
> > <goal>clean</goal>
> > </goals>
> > </execution>
> > </executions>
> > </plugin>
> >
> > <!-- Cobertura report. -->
> > <plugin>
> > <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
> > <artifactId>cobertura-maven-plugin</artifactId>
> > <version>2.5.1</version>
> > </plugin>
> >
> > Is this OK? If so should they be different versions?
> >
> > --
> > *Lewis*
>
--
*Lewis*
Re: two cobertura-maven-plugin's for main pom.xml
Posted by Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>.
Hi Lewis,
they should be declared in both build/report sections, right?
best,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney
<le...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We seem to have two of the above plugin but with different config.
>
> <!-- Test coverage plugin. -->
> <plugin>
> <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
> <artifactId>cobertura-maven-plugin</artifactId>
> <version>2.0</version>
> <executions>
> <execution>
> <goals>
> <goal>clean</goal>
> </goals>
> </execution>
> </executions>
> </plugin>
>
> <!-- Cobertura report. -->
> <plugin>
> <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
> <artifactId>cobertura-maven-plugin</artifactId>
> <version>2.5.1</version>
> </plugin>
>
> Is this OK? If so should they be different versions?
>
> --
> *Lewis*