[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-1350) Filters which are "consumers" should not reset the payload or flags and should better reuse the token

["Michael McCandless (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1350.
----------------------------------------

       Resolution: Duplicate
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 2.3.3)
    Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available]  (was: [Patch Available, New])

Isn't this one now a dup of LUCENE-1333?

> Filters which are "consumers" should not reset the payload or flags and should better reuse the token
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1350
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1350
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Analysis, contrib/*
>            Reporter: Doron Cohen
>            Assignee: Doron Cohen
>             Fix For: 2.4
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1350-test.patch, LUCENE-1350.patch, LUCENE-1350.patch
>
>
> Passing tokens with payloads through SnowballFilter results in tokens with no payloads.
> A workaround for this is to apply stemming first and only then run whatever logic creates the payload, but this is not always convenient.
> Other "consumer" filters have similar problem.
> These filters can - and should - reuse the token, by implementing next(Token), effectively also fixing the unwanted resetting.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org