You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Robert Muir (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/10/31 13:21:14 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4515) Make MemoryIndex more memory
efficient
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13487705#comment-13487705 ]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4515:
-------------------------------------
Are we sure this is the right direction to go for MemoryIndex?
I think its being abused for highlighting: but it has other real use cases and we shouldn't make it worse for its real use cases just because highlighting abuses it.
instead I think if the concern is garbage then maybe just use term vectors and compute this stuff at index time.
> Make MemoryIndex more memory efficient
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-4515
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4515
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: modules/other
> Affects Versions: 4.0, 4.1, 5.0
> Reporter: Simon Willnauer
> Fix For: 4.1, 5.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-4515.patch
>
>
> Currently MemoryIndex uses BytesRef objects to represent terms and holds an int[] per term per field to represent postings. For highlighting this creates a ton of objects for each search that 1. need to be GCed and 2. can't be reused.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org