You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@cassandra.apache.org by Chris Goffinet <go...@digg.com> on 2009/05/19 02:56:44 UTC
multi-table
Has anyone here needed multi-table support yet in Cassandra? Anyone
willing to share use cases where you felt maybe you didn't need multi-
table support? Seems just a bit odd it isn't there yet :)
---
Chris Goffinet
goffinet@digg.com
Re: multi-table
Posted by Chris Goffinet <go...@digg.com>.
Great!
Sure, contact me off-list.
-Chris
On May 18, 2009, at 6:25 PM, Jonathan ellis wrote:
> Different apps will have different performance characteristics (and
> different key domains, which can also be important). So there are
> operational reasons to prefer cluster-per-app.
>
> That said, multi table support is high on my priority list. The
> changes required are straightforward so I'd love to help someone
> dive in as opposed to just doing it myself. :)
>
> -Jonathan
>
> On May 18, 2009, at 7:56 PM, Chris Goffinet <go...@digg.com> wrote:
>
>> Has anyone here needed multi-table support yet in Cassandra? Anyone
>> willing to share use cases where you felt maybe you didn't need
>> multi-table support? Seems just a bit odd it isn't there yet :)
>>
>> ---
>> Chris Goffinet
>> goffinet@digg.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Re: multi-table
Posted by Jonathan ellis <jb...@gmail.com>.
Different apps will have different performance characteristics (and
different key domains, which can also be important). So there are
operational reasons to prefer cluster-per-app.
That said, multi table support is high on my priority list. The
changes required are straightforward so I'd love to help someone dive
in as opposed to just doing it myself. :)
-Jonathan
On May 18, 2009, at 7:56 PM, Chris Goffinet <go...@digg.com> wrote:
> Has anyone here needed multi-table support yet in Cassandra? Anyone
> willing to share use cases where you felt maybe you didn't need
> multi-table support? Seems just a bit odd it isn't there yet :)
>
> ---
> Chris Goffinet
> goffinet@digg.com
>
>
>
>
>