You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@cassandra.apache.org by "Richard L. Burton III" <mr...@gmail.com> on 2016/01/31 06:00:44 UTC

Cassandra - how to scale over time.

Initially, I want to keep costs fairly tight if possible. I plan to use 3
instances of m1.large servers with 200GB of disk space per instance. The
application will use up this diskspace within the first 4 months. At which
point, I will increase the disk space per node by adding new nodes to the
cluster with larger disks and replace the older instances.

The general idea is to keep the disk lean until I need to expand them to
500GB after which I will just add more new nodes to the cluster.

P.S. I haven't done any benchmarks, but the system won't be too
CPU intensive, so I wanted to expand the capacity of the disks by "doing a
rolling upgrade" until I need to add nodes to the cluster to handle the
large disk spaces (e.g., 500GB per node max) or CPU becomes an issue.

Does this sound like a good solution?

-- 
-Richard L. Burton III
@rburton

Re: Cassandra - how to scale over time.

Posted by "Richard L. Burton III" <mr...@gmail.com>.
Ignore this - :)


On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Richard L. Burton III <mr...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Initially, I want to keep costs fairly tight if possible. I plan to use 3
> instances of m1.large servers with 200GB of disk space per instance. The
> application will use up this diskspace within the first 4 months. At which
> point, I will increase the disk space per node by adding new nodes to the
> cluster with larger disks and replace the older instances.
>
> The general idea is to keep the disk lean until I need to expand them to
> 500GB after which I will just add more new nodes to the cluster.
>
> P.S. I haven't done any benchmarks, but the system won't be too
> CPU intensive, so I wanted to expand the capacity of the disks by "doing a
> rolling upgrade" until I need to add nodes to the cluster to handle the
> large disk spaces (e.g., 500GB per node max) or CPU becomes an issue.
>
> Does this sound like a good solution?
>
> --
> -Richard L. Burton III
> @rburton
>



-- 
-Richard L. Burton III
@rburton