You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@santuario.apache.org by Colm O hEigeartaigh <co...@apache.org> on 2010/11/29 12:05:13 UTC
Removing tags
Hi all,
I propose removing all of the following tags below via an "svn
delete". Basically all "*RC" and "*beta" tags (apart from the latest C
RC), as well as the "v*" tags. Or should we keep the "v*" tags? You
can see all of the current tags here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/santuario/tags/
Any objections?
Colm.
# C_1_0_0_RC1/
# C_1_2_0_RC1/
# C_1_3_0_RC1/
# C_1_3_0_RC2/
# C_1_3_0_RC3/
# C_1_3_1_RC1/
# C_1_3_1_RC2/
# J_1_3_RC1/
# J_1_3_RC2/
# J_1_4_1_Beta1/
# J_1_4_2_Beta1/
# J_1_4_2_Beta2/
# J_1_4_2_RC1/
# J_1_4_3_Beta1/
# J_1_4_4_RC1/
# J_1_4_Beta0/
# J_1_4_Beta1/
# J_1_4_Beta2/
# J_1_4_RC1/
# J_1_4_RC2/
# J_1_4_RC2a/
# J_1_4_RC3/
# J_1_4_RC4/
# NOTICE/
# Release_00_001/
# v1_0_0/
# v1_0_1/
# v1_0_2/
# v1_0_4/
# v1_0_5D2/
# v1_0_6/
# v1_0_71/
# v1_0_8/
# v1_0_81/
# v1_0_82/
# v1_0_83/
# v1_0_84/
# v1_0_85/
# v1_2_1j/
# v1_2j/
# v1p1p0_01/
# v1p1p0_02/
# v1p1p0_03/
# v1p1p0_04/
# v1p2p1/
# xmlsec-1_2_RC2/
RE: Removing tags
Posted by "Cantor, Scott E." <ca...@osu.edu>.
> Ok. Scott, are you on board with me removing the C*RC tags I listed above?
Yes, that's fine.
-- Scott
Re: Removing tags
Posted by Colm O hEigeartaigh <co...@apache.org>.
Ok. Scott, are you on board with me removing the C*RC tags I listed above?
Colm.
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Sean Mullan <se...@oracle.com> wrote:
> On 11/29/10 6:05 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I propose removing all of the following tags below via an "svn
>> delete". Basically all "*RC" and "*beta" tags (apart from the latest C
>> RC), as well as the "v*" tags. Or should we keep the "v*" tags? You
>> can see all of the current tags here:
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/santuario/tags/
>>
>> Any objections?
>
> I think we should keep the v* tags, since some of them do mark official
> releases.
>
> Thanks,
> Sean
>
>>
>> Colm.
>>
>> # C_1_0_0_RC1/
>> # C_1_2_0_RC1/
>> # C_1_3_0_RC1/
>> # C_1_3_0_RC2/
>> # C_1_3_0_RC3/
>> # C_1_3_1_RC1/
>> # C_1_3_1_RC2/
>> # J_1_3_RC1/
>> # J_1_3_RC2/
>> # J_1_4_1_Beta1/
>> # J_1_4_2_Beta1/
>> # J_1_4_2_Beta2/
>> # J_1_4_2_RC1/
>> # J_1_4_3_Beta1/
>> # J_1_4_4_RC1/
>> # J_1_4_Beta0/
>> # J_1_4_Beta1/
>> # J_1_4_Beta2/
>> # J_1_4_RC1/
>> # J_1_4_RC2/
>> # J_1_4_RC2a/
>> # J_1_4_RC3/
>> # J_1_4_RC4/
>> # NOTICE/
>> # Release_00_001/
>> # v1_0_0/
>> # v1_0_1/
>> # v1_0_2/
>> # v1_0_4/
>> # v1_0_5D2/
>> # v1_0_6/
>> # v1_0_71/
>> # v1_0_8/
>> # v1_0_81/
>> # v1_0_82/
>> # v1_0_83/
>> # v1_0_84/
>> # v1_0_85/
>> # v1_2_1j/
>> # v1_2j/
>> # v1p1p0_01/
>> # v1p1p0_02/
>> # v1p1p0_03/
>> # v1p1p0_04/
>> # v1p2p1/
>> # xmlsec-1_2_RC2/
>
Re: Removing tags
Posted by Sean Mullan <se...@oracle.com>.
On 11/29/10 6:05 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I propose removing all of the following tags below via an "svn
> delete". Basically all "*RC" and "*beta" tags (apart from the latest C
> RC), as well as the "v*" tags. Or should we keep the "v*" tags? You
> can see all of the current tags here:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/santuario/tags/
>
> Any objections?
I think we should keep the v* tags, since some of them do mark official releases.
Thanks,
Sean
>
> Colm.
>
> # C_1_0_0_RC1/
> # C_1_2_0_RC1/
> # C_1_3_0_RC1/
> # C_1_3_0_RC2/
> # C_1_3_0_RC3/
> # C_1_3_1_RC1/
> # C_1_3_1_RC2/
> # J_1_3_RC1/
> # J_1_3_RC2/
> # J_1_4_1_Beta1/
> # J_1_4_2_Beta1/
> # J_1_4_2_Beta2/
> # J_1_4_2_RC1/
> # J_1_4_3_Beta1/
> # J_1_4_4_RC1/
> # J_1_4_Beta0/
> # J_1_4_Beta1/
> # J_1_4_Beta2/
> # J_1_4_RC1/
> # J_1_4_RC2/
> # J_1_4_RC2a/
> # J_1_4_RC3/
> # J_1_4_RC4/
> # NOTICE/
> # Release_00_001/
> # v1_0_0/
> # v1_0_1/
> # v1_0_2/
> # v1_0_4/
> # v1_0_5D2/
> # v1_0_6/
> # v1_0_71/
> # v1_0_8/
> # v1_0_81/
> # v1_0_82/
> # v1_0_83/
> # v1_0_84/
> # v1_0_85/
> # v1_2_1j/
> # v1_2j/
> # v1p1p0_01/
> # v1p1p0_02/
> # v1p1p0_03/
> # v1p1p0_04/
> # v1p2p1/
> # xmlsec-1_2_RC2/