You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by da...@chaosreigns.com on 2011/05/05 19:44:33 UTC
More bugs needing voting or closing (2011-05-05 B)
Need voting:
[review for 3.2] RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP ruleset incorrectly black flagging IP range!!!
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6552
Needs 1 vote for *3.2*. Come on. This patch was created and has been
waiting for votes since March.
Disable rfc-ignorant.org
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6526
Needs 3 votes.
(Summary needs "[review]" added.)
Need closing:
Add a rules conditional function has(), similar to can()
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6581
Patch committed.
And the 17 open bugs targeted for 3.3.2 with "[review]" in their summary,
which I believe means they're just waiting for a vote:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/buglist.cgi?list_id=177;short_desc=%5Breview%5D;query_format=advanced;bug_status=NEW;bug_status=ASSIGNED;bug_status=REOPENED;short_desc_type=allwordssubstr;target_milestone=3.3.2
Nice, one of them marked Critical waiting for 1 vote for almost a year:
[review] win32: posix macro not implemented - spamd
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6375
--
"I refuse to tip toe through life only to arrive safely at death."
http://www.ChaosReigns.com
Re: More bugs needing voting or closing (2011-05-05 B)
Posted by da...@chaosreigns.com.
On 05/05, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>
> >>>Disable rfc-ignorant.org
> >>>https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6526
> >>>Needs 3 votes.
> >>>(Summary needs "[review]" added.)
> >>Needs 3 votes for what? Looks like it is already committed and the
> >>ticket is resolved because the rules were set to a score of 0.0.
> >The commit was not of the attached patch.
> >
> Sorry about that. The patch authored by you appears to be exactly
> what I stated and I think is approved. Do you agree and THAT patch
> should be committed to 3.3.2 & trunk?
Yes.
--
"The price of freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere,
at any time, and with utter recklessness." - Robert A. Heinlein
http://www.ChaosReigns.com
Re: More bugs needing voting or closing (2011-05-05 B)
Posted by "Kevin A. McGrail" <KM...@PCCC.com>.
>>> Disable rfc-ignorant.org
>>> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6526
>>> Needs 3 votes.
>>> (Summary needs "[review]" added.)
>> Needs 3 votes for what? Looks like it is already committed and the
>> ticket is resolved because the rules were set to a score of 0.0.
> The commit was not of the attached patch.
>
Sorry about that. The patch authored by you appears to be exactly what
I stated and I think is approved. Do you agree and THAT patch should be
committed to 3.3.2 & trunk?
Regards,
KAM
Re: More bugs needing voting or closing (2011-05-05 B)
Posted by da...@chaosreigns.com.
On 05/05, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>
> >Disable rfc-ignorant.org
> >https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6526
> >Needs 3 votes.
> >(Summary needs "[review]" added.)
> Needs 3 votes for what? Looks like it is already committed and the
> ticket is resolved because the rules were set to a score of 0.0.
The commit was not of the attached patch.
--
"The price of freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere,
at any time, and with utter recklessness." - Robert A. Heinlein
http://www.ChaosReigns.com
Re: More bugs needing voting or closing (2011-05-05 B)
Posted by "Kevin A. McGrail" <KM...@PCCC.com>.
> Disable rfc-ignorant.org
> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6526
> Needs 3 votes.
> (Summary needs "[review]" added.)
Needs 3 votes for what? Looks like it is already committed and the
ticket is resolved because the rules were set to a score of 0.0.
>
> Need closing:
>
> Add a rules conditional function has(), similar to can()
> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6581
> Patch committed.
>
>
> And the 17 open bugs targeted for 3.3.2 with "[review]" in their summary,
> which I believe means they're just waiting for a vote:
> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/buglist.cgi?list_id=177;short_desc=%5Breview%5D;query_format=advanced;bug_status=NEW;bug_status=ASSIGNED;bug_status=REOPENED;short_desc_type=allwordssubstr;target_milestone=3.3.2
>
6558 - Ready to Commit
6241 - Ready to Commit at Justin's discretion
6336 - Needs one vote from someone other than Mark or myself
6375 - ""
6376 - ""
6377 - ""
6382 - ""
6418 - ""
6454 - ""
6468 - ""
6566 - ""
6447 - ""
6403 - Karsten, can you weigh in on this one. To me, I don't like the
patch and I'm trending towards INVALID / WONTFIX because it seems to be
an implementation issue more so than an SA bug combined with a
workaround for Google. However, if you say it's good, google is such a
large provider, I would vote +1.
5491 - ready to commit
6229 - Retargeted to 3.4.0
5924 - What exact
5924 - Out of my area of expertise and I'm really not certain WHAT we
are voting on ;-) If you need a +1, it sounds like a good plain to have
a cross-signed offical SA keyring because it's held up being able to
release as noted a few days ago.
Regards,
KAM