You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ignite.apache.org by "Ivan Daschinskiy (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/11/10 10:37:00 UTC
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-13690) Failed to init coordinator caches
on concurrent start of nodes with different cache configurations.
Ivan Daschinskiy created IGNITE-13690:
-----------------------------------------
Summary: Failed to init coordinator caches on concurrent start of nodes with different cache configurations.
Key: IGNITE-13690
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13690
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 2.9
Reporter: Ivan Daschinskiy
Scenario:
1. Start simultaneously nodes with different cache configurations
(for simplicity, let client nodes be with configured caches, servers without).
2. When processing first exchange on coordinator, coordinator will fail with
{code:java}
[2020-11-10 13:23:57,232][ERROR][start-node-1][DifferentCacheConfigurationConcurrentStart0] Got exception while starting (will rollback startup routine).
java.lang.AssertionError: Invalid exchange futures state [cur=6, total=7]
at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.CacheAffinitySharedManager$17.applyx(CacheAffinitySharedManager.java:1964)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.CacheAffinitySharedManager$17.applyx(CacheAffinitySharedManager.java:1935)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.CacheAffinitySharedManager.lambda$forAllRegisteredCacheGroups$e0a6939d$1(CacheAffinitySharedManager.java:1265)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.IgniteUtils.doInParallel(IgniteUtils.java:11157)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.IgniteUtils.doInParallel(IgniteUtils.java:11059)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.IgniteUtils.doInParallel(IgniteUtils.java:11039)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.CacheAffinitySharedManager.forAllRegisteredCacheGroups(CacheAffinitySharedManager.java:1264)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.CacheAffinitySharedManager.initCoordinatorCaches(CacheAffinitySharedManager.java:1935)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.preloader.GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.initCoordinatorCaches(GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.java:716)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.preloader.GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.init(GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture.java:850)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCachePartitionExchangeManager$ExchangeWorker.body0(GridCachePartitionExchangeManager.java:3175)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCachePartitionExchangeManager$ExchangeWorker.body(GridCachePartitionExchangeManager.java:3021)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.worker.GridWorker.run(GridWorker.java:120)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
{code}
The main reason is the race on creating {{LocalJoinCachesContext}}, so local join caches differs from registered caches from other nodes.
Reproducer for zk and ring discoveries are attached.
NB! Not always reproducible -- to increase probability of fail, add sleep in
{{GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture#init}}
{code:java}
public void init(boolean newCrd) throws IgniteInterruptedCheckedException {
if (newCrd)
U.sleep(500);
{code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)