Tapestry vs JSF: JSF for nonbelievers: JSF component development

["Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo" <th...@gmail.com>]

I'm not trying to be a fanboy (but I'm a Tapestry fan) nor a troll, but  
the following article about developmento of JSF components really helped  
me to figure out what JSF is, specially when compared to Tapestry 5:  
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/library/j-jsf4/. The author is  
trying to stop FUD that says that writing JSF components
is hard. Then I remembered how much time I spent trying to write my first  
T5 component (less than 5 minutes after I figured out where I had to put  
its template).

I'm learning JSF to do a presentation comparing different Java web  
frameworks. I'm not liking it, as it's too similar to Struts. ;) At first  
I thought JSF was similar to Tapestry than it really is, and Tapestry  
looks way better.

What do you think JSF got better than Tapestry 5? The other side of the  
question is so easy that I don't need to question. :) I want to do a fair,  
passionless comparison between frameworks.

Thiago

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org