You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ant.apache.org by Antoine Levy-Lambert <an...@gmx.de> on 2006/04/27 03:13:39 UTC

[VOTE] suppression of the JProbe and Metamata tasks

Stephane Bailliez wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As I just resubscribed and noticed there is apparently spring cleanup
> going on in the code, I think it would be worth to get rid of:
> - JProbe Coverage task
> - Metamata Audit task
> - Metamata Metrics task
>
> JProbe should not be working anymore since JProbe 4
> As for Metamata, I doubt anyone is using it anymore as
> Metamata/WebGain products disappeared after being absorbed by Oracle
> in 2002 (except Toplink).
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> Stephane
>
The 3 people who answered were all in favor of this cleanup. I thought
that it might be better to start a vote thread on this one too.

The cleanup means concretely removing the
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.sitraka and
                                                             the
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optiona.metamata

packages, with the corresponding documentation and testcases.

Do you agree that we should do it ?

[ ] Yes

[ ] No

Let me start with my +1

Regards,

Antoine



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


Re: [VOTE] suppression of the JProbe and Metamata tasks

Posted by Kev Jackson <ke...@it.fts-vn.com>.
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:

>Kev Jackson wrote:
>  
>
>>    
>>
>>Why is this code change different from the other changes to remove
>>deprecated classes?  Is it simply because these tasks are 3pp?  If so
>>does that mean that we can break bwc iff it's dependent on a 3pp?
>>
>>Kev
>>
>>    
>>
>I assume that there are no extensions (by API programmers) of the
>Metamata and of the Sitraka JProbe tasks.
>
>To the contrary, it is possible that there are API users who use for
>instance the Project#resolveFile() methods.
>  
>
Ok that makes sense, thanks for answering.
Kev

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


Re: "API"

Posted by Steve Loughran <st...@apache.org>.
Jesse Glick wrote:
> Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
> 
>> I assume that there are no extensions (by API programmers) of the 
>> Metamata and of the Sitraka JProbe tasks.
>>
>> To the contrary, it is possible that there are API users who use for 
>> instance the Project#resolveFile() methods.
> 
> 
> Hmm, it would be nice if we actually published an API so people could 
> know for sure. :-) The habit of making everything public and nonfinal 
> and throwing all classes into one namespace (with full Javadoc) means we 
> are pretty limited in the kinds of refactorings we can do without 
> breaking unknown parties.
> 
> -J.
> 

True,  but in OSS-land, what else can you do. I and others on the Xom 
user list regularly have discourse with elliotte rusty harold on making 
this or that method public, as he's chosen the 'hide the entire 
implementation by default' algorithm. Yes it gives you flexibilty for 
the implementor, but its not clear the end users gain.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


Re: "API" (was: [VOTE] suppression of the JProbe and Metamata tasks)

Posted by Jesse Glick <je...@sun.com>.
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
> I assume that there are no extensions (by API programmers) of the 
> Metamata and of the Sitraka JProbe tasks.
> 
> To the contrary, it is possible that there are API users who use for 
> instance the Project#resolveFile() methods.

Hmm, it would be nice if we actually published an API so people could 
know for sure. :-) The habit of making everything public and nonfinal 
and throwing all classes into one namespace (with full Javadoc) means we 
are pretty limited in the kinds of refactorings we can do without 
breaking unknown parties.

-J.

-- 
jesse.glick@sun.com  x22801  netbeans.org  ant.apache.org
       http://google.com/search?q=e%5E%28pi*i%29%2B1


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


Re: [VOTE] suppression of the JProbe and Metamata tasks

Posted by Antoine Levy-Lambert <an...@gmx.de>.
Kev Jackson wrote:
>
>
>>
> Why is this code change different from the other changes to remove
> deprecated classes?  Is it simply because these tasks are 3pp?  If so
> does that mean that we can break bwc iff it's dependent on a 3pp?
>
> Kev
>
I assume that there are no extensions (by API programmers) of the
Metamata and of the Sitraka JProbe tasks.

To the contrary, it is possible that there are API users who use for
instance the Project#resolveFile() methods.

Regards,
Antoine


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


Re: [VOTE] suppression of the JProbe and Metamata tasks

Posted by Kev Jackson <ke...@it.fts-vn.com>.
>Do you agree that we should do it ?
>
>[ X ] Yes
>
>  
>
+1

>[ ] No
>  
>
Why is this code change different from the other changes to remove 
deprecated classes?  Is it simply because these tasks are 3pp?  If so 
does that mean that we can break bwc iff it's dependent on a 3pp?

Kev

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


Re: [VOTE] suppression of the JProbe and Metamata tasks

Posted by Stephane Bailliez <sb...@gmail.com>.
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
> The 3 people who answered were all in favor of this cleanup. I thought
> that it might be better to start a vote thread on this one too.
>
> The cleanup means concretely removing the
> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.sitraka and
>                                                              the
> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optiona.metamata
>
> packages, with the corresponding documentation and testcases.
>
> Do you agree that we should do it ?
>
> [X] Yes
>
> [ ] No
>
> Let me start with my +1
>   


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


Re: [VOTE] suppression of the JProbe and Metamata tasks

Posted by Steve Loughran <st...@apache.org>.
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
> Stephane Bailliez wrote:
> 
>>Hi all,
>>
>>As I just resubscribed and noticed there is apparently spring cleanup
>>going on in the code, I think it would be worth to get rid of:
>>- JProbe Coverage task
>>- Metamata Audit task
>>- Metamata Metrics task
>>
>>JProbe should not be working anymore since JProbe 4
>>As for Metamata, I doubt anyone is using it anymore as
>>Metamata/WebGain products disappeared after being absorbed by Oracle
>>in 2002 (except Toplink).
>>
>>Thoughts ?
>>
>>Stephane
>>
> 
> The 3 people who answered were all in favor of this cleanup. I thought
> that it might be better to start a vote thread on this one too.
> 
> The cleanup means concretely removing the
> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.sitraka and
>                                                              the
> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optiona.metamata
> 
> packages, with the corresponding documentation and testcases.
> 
> Do you agree that we should do it ?


  [+1 ] Yes

  [ ] No

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


Re: [VOTE] suppression of the JProbe and Metamata tasks

Posted by Conor MacNeill <co...@apache.org>.
> Do you agree that we should do it ?
> 
> [ ] Yes
> 
> [ ] No
> 
> Let me start with my +1
> 

+1

Conor


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


Re: [VOTE] suppression of the JProbe and Metamata tasks

Posted by Dominique Devienne <dd...@gmail.com>.
On 4/26/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert <an...@gmx.de> wrote:
> The cleanup means concretely removing:
> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.sitraka
> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optiona.metamata
> packages, with the corresponding documentation and testcases.

+1. --DD

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


[VOTE-RESULTS] suppression of the JProbe and Metamata tasks

Posted by Antoine Levy-Lambert <an...@gmx.de>.
Hi,

all the voters voted +1, so we are going ahead with the suppression of
the JProbe and Metamata tasks.

Regards,

Antoine

Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
> Stephane Bailliez wrote:
>   
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As I just resubscribed and noticed there is apparently spring cleanup
>> going on in the code, I think it would be worth to get rid of:
>> - JProbe Coverage task
>> - Metamata Audit task
>> - Metamata Metrics task
>>
>> JProbe should not be working anymore since JProbe 4
>> As for Metamata, I doubt anyone is using it anymore as
>> Metamata/WebGain products disappeared after being absorbed by Oracle
>> in 2002 (except Toplink).
>>
>> Thoughts ?
>>
>> Stephane
>>
>>     
> The 3 people who answered were all in favor of this cleanup. I thought
> that it might be better to start a vote thread on this one too.
>
> The cleanup means concretely removing the
> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.sitraka and
>                                                              the
> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optiona.metamata
>
> packages, with the corresponding documentation and testcases.
>
> Do you agree that we should do it ?
>
> [ ] Yes
>
> [ ] No
>
> Let me start with my +1
>
> Regards,
>
> Antoine
>
>   


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


Re: [VOTE] suppression of the JProbe and Metamata tasks

Posted by Martijn Kruithof <jk...@apache.org>.
I don't think I already reacted:

>>
>> > Do you agree that we should do it ?
>> >
>> > [+1] Yes
>> >
>> > [ ] No
>
Martijn

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


Re: [VOTE] suppression of the JProbe and Metamata tasks

Posted by Peter Reilly <pe...@gmail.com>.
[+1] Yes

Peter


On 4/28/06, Matt Benson <gu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> --- Antoine Levy-Lambert <an...@gmx.de> wrote:
> [SNIP]
> > Do you agree that we should do it ?
> >
> > [+1] Yes
> >
> > [ ] No
>
> -Matt
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] suppression of the JProbe and Metamata tasks

Posted by Matt Benson <gu...@yahoo.com>.
--- Antoine Levy-Lambert <an...@gmx.de> wrote:
[SNIP]
> Do you agree that we should do it ?
> 
> [+1] Yes
> 
> [ ] No

-Matt


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org