You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Oliver Heger <ol...@oliver-heger.de> on 2008/12/19 22:46:39 UTC
[VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.6 based on RC2
This is a vote for releasing Commons Configuration 1.6 based on the 2nd
release candidate.
Changes since RC1 are the following:
- Problems reported by the RAT report have been addressed.
- Some problems reported by findbugs have been fixed. Findbugs still
reports some issues, but the remaining ones are either uncritical or
would need binary incompatible changes.
- CONFIGURATION-353 was fixed.
The artifacts (including release notes and a clirr report) can be found
here:
http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.6rc2/
The site for 1.6rc2 is also available at
http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.6rc2/site/
The corresponding tag in svn is
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_1_6RC2/
Please cast your votes.
TIA
Oliver
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.6 based on RC2
Posted by Jörg Schaible <jo...@gmx.de>.
Oliver Heger wrote:
> This is a vote for releasing Commons Configuration 1.6 based on the 2nd
> release candidate.
>
> Changes since RC1 are the following:
> - Problems reported by the RAT report have been addressed.
> - Some problems reported by findbugs have been fixed. Findbugs still
> reports some issues, but the remaining ones are either uncritical or
> would need binary incompatible changes.
> - CONFIGURATION-353 was fixed.
>
> The artifacts (including release notes and a clirr report) can be found
> here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.6rc2/
>
> The site for 1.6rc2 is also available at
>
> http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.6rc2/site/
>
> The corresponding tag in svn is
>
>
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_1_6RC2/
>
+1
Tested to build source distribution on Gentoo x86 with my compiler zoo
(Blackdown 1.4.2, IBM 1.6, JRockit 1.4.2/1.5, Sun JDK 1.4.2/1.5/1.6). As
usual IBM 1.4.2/1.5 fails because of Maven itself.
- Jörg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.6 based on RC2
Posted by Luc Maisonobe <Lu...@free.fr>.
Oliver Heger a écrit :
> This is a vote for releasing Commons Configuration 1.6 based on the 2nd
> release candidate.
+1
Luc
>
> Changes since RC1 are the following:
> - Problems reported by the RAT report have been addressed.
> - Some problems reported by findbugs have been fixed. Findbugs still
> reports some issues, but the remaining ones are either uncritical or
> would need binary incompatible changes.
> - CONFIGURATION-353 was fixed.
>
> The artifacts (including release notes and a clirr report) can be found
> here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.6rc2/
>
> The site for 1.6rc2 is also available at
>
> http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.6rc2/site/
>
> The corresponding tag in svn is
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_1_6RC2/
>
>
> Please cast your votes.
> TIA
> Oliver
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.6 based on RC2
Posted by Oliver Heger <ol...@oliver-heger.de>.
Rahul Akolkar schrieb:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Oliver Heger
>> <ol...@oliver-heger.de> wrote:
>> <snip/>
>>> That's really strange. I tested on Vista with JDK 1.6 and on a Windows 2000
>>> VM, but cannot reproduce the problem. Can this be a network configuration
>>> issue?
>>>
>> <snap/>
>>
>> No idea since I didn't get any time yet to dig into it. However, I did
>> try the 1.5 tag right now, and it fails on the same test on {XP,1.6}
>> as well i.e. this is not a regression. I'll therefore choose to
>> abstain from this vote and let others more familiar with the code,
>> such as you, make the call (formally, you can count my vote as +0 if
>> you want).
>>
> <snip/>
>
> I finally got a chance to look at code, and I don't think there is
> anything in the source that needs attention.
>
> Artifacts look good.
>
> +1 to release.
>
> -Rahul
>
Thank you for taking the time to dig into this issue.
Oliver
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.6 based on RC2
Posted by Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Oliver Heger
> <ol...@oliver-heger.de> wrote:
> <snip/>
>> That's really strange. I tested on Vista with JDK 1.6 and on a Windows 2000
>> VM, but cannot reproduce the problem. Can this be a network configuration
>> issue?
>>
> <snap/>
>
> No idea since I didn't get any time yet to dig into it. However, I did
> try the 1.5 tag right now, and it fails on the same test on {XP,1.6}
> as well i.e. this is not a regression. I'll therefore choose to
> abstain from this vote and let others more familiar with the code,
> such as you, make the call (formally, you can count my vote as +0 if
> you want).
>
<snip/>
I finally got a chance to look at code, and I don't think there is
anything in the source that needs attention.
Artifacts look good.
+1 to release.
-Rahul
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.6 based on RC2
Posted by Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Oliver Heger
<ol...@oliver-heger.de> wrote:
<snip/>
> That's really strange. I tested on Vista with JDK 1.6 and on a Windows 2000
> VM, but cannot reproduce the problem. Can this be a network configuration
> issue?
>
<snap/>
No idea since I didn't get any time yet to dig into it. However, I did
try the 1.5 tag right now, and it fails on the same test on {XP,1.6}
as well i.e. this is not a regression. I'll therefore choose to
abstain from this vote and let others more familiar with the code,
such as you, make the call (formally, you can count my vote as +0 if
you want).
-Rahul
> I am pretty sure that the code affected was not changed since the last
> release. So it would be of great help if you could try the 1.5 version.
>
> Thanks
> Oliver
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.6 based on RC2
Posted by Oliver Heger <ol...@oliver-heger.de>.
Rahul Akolkar schrieb:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 7:41 PM, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>> On Dec 19, 2008, at 4:29 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>>>>>
>>>> What OS and JVM? I ran it on my Mac with 1.5 and 1.6 as well as Ubuntu
>>>> with
>>>> Sun JDK 1.6 and did not see that.
>>>>
>>> <snip/>
>>>
>>> Interesting. XP (and Sun 1.6, as already noted). Can anyone else verify?
>>>
>>> -Rahul
>> Actually, I was expecting that answer.
>>
>> I stopped using Windows for any development work a while ago because it
>> always seems to behave different than everything else. In fact, my Ubuntu
>> system is running in a VM on XP. I guess I could try it there, but I don't
>> have Maven or my IDE installed in Windows.
>>
>> Out of curiosity, can you check if Commons Configuration 1.5 fail on XP with
>> Java 6?
>>
> <snip/>
>
> Surely. I need to step out right now, I'll do so at the first
> opportunity (and latest by tomorrow).
>
> -Rahul
>
>
That's really strange. I tested on Vista with JDK 1.6 and on a Windows
2000 VM, but cannot reproduce the problem. Can this be a network
configuration issue?
I am pretty sure that the code affected was not changed since the last
release. So it would be of great help if you could try the 1.5 version.
Thanks
Oliver
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.6 based on RC2
Posted by Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 7:41 PM, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>
> On Dec 19, 2008, at 4:29 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>> What OS and JVM? I ran it on my Mac with 1.5 and 1.6 as well as Ubuntu
>>> with
>>> Sun JDK 1.6 and did not see that.
>>>
>> <snip/>
>>
>> Interesting. XP (and Sun 1.6, as already noted). Can anyone else verify?
>>
>> -Rahul
>
> Actually, I was expecting that answer.
>
> I stopped using Windows for any development work a while ago because it
> always seems to behave different than everything else. In fact, my Ubuntu
> system is running in a VM on XP. I guess I could try it there, but I don't
> have Maven or my IDE installed in Windows.
>
> Out of curiosity, can you check if Commons Configuration 1.5 fail on XP with
> Java 6?
>
<snip/>
Surely. I need to step out right now, I'll do so at the first
opportunity (and latest by tomorrow).
-Rahul
> Ralph
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.6 based on RC2
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
On Dec 19, 2008, at 4:29 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>>>
>>>
>> What OS and JVM? I ran it on my Mac with 1.5 and 1.6 as well as
>> Ubuntu with
>> Sun JDK 1.6 and did not see that.
>>
> <snip/>
>
> Interesting. XP (and Sun 1.6, as already noted). Can anyone else
> verify?
>
> -Rahul
Actually, I was expecting that answer.
I stopped using Windows for any development work a while ago because
it always seems to behave different than everything else. In fact, my
Ubuntu system is running in a VM on XP. I guess I could try it there,
but I don't have Maven or my IDE installed in Windows.
Out of curiosity, can you check if Commons Configuration 1.5 fail on
XP with Java 6?
Ralph
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.6 based on RC2
Posted by Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>
> On Dec 19, 2008, at 3:57 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>>>
>> <snip/>
>>
>> In trying to build the above with m1 as well as m2 (JDK 1.6) I get a
>> test failure [1].
>>
>> -Rahul
>>
>> [1]
>> Testcase: testGetInetAddres
>> (org.apache.commons.configuration.TestDataConfiguration): FAILED
>> ConversionException should be thrown for unknown hosts
>> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: ConversionException should be
>> thrown for unknown hosts
>> at
>> org.apache.commons.configuration.TestDataConfiguration.testGetInetAddress(TestDataConfiguration.java:1689)
>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>> at
>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>> at
>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>>
> What OS and JVM? I ran it on my Mac with 1.5 and 1.6 as well as Ubuntu with
> Sun JDK 1.6 and did not see that.
>
<snip/>
Interesting. XP (and Sun 1.6, as already noted). Can anyone else verify?
-Rahul
> Ralph
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.6 based on RC2
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
On Dec 19, 2008, at 3:57 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>>
> <snip/>
>
> In trying to build the above with m1 as well as m2 (JDK 1.6) I get a
> test failure [1].
>
> -Rahul
>
> [1]
> Testcase: testGetInetAddres
> (org.apache.commons.configuration.TestDataConfiguration): FAILED
> ConversionException should be thrown for unknown hosts
> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: ConversionException should be
> thrown for unknown hosts
> at
> org
> .apache
> .commons
> .configuration
> .TestDataConfiguration.testGetInetAddress(TestDataConfiguration.java:
> 1689)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at
> sun
> .reflect
> .NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> at
> sun
> .reflect
> .DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl
> .invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>
What OS and JVM? I ran it on my Mac with 1.5 and 1.6 as well as Ubuntu
with Sun JDK 1.6 and did not see that.
Ralph
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.6 based on RC2
Posted by Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Oliver Heger
<ol...@oliver-heger.de> wrote:
> This is a vote for releasing Commons Configuration 1.6 based on the 2nd
> release candidate.
>
> Changes since RC1 are the following:
> - Problems reported by the RAT report have been addressed.
> - Some problems reported by findbugs have been fixed. Findbugs still reports
> some issues, but the remaining ones are either uncritical or would need
> binary incompatible changes.
> - CONFIGURATION-353 was fixed.
>
> The artifacts (including release notes and a clirr report) can be found
> here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.6rc2/
>
> The site for 1.6rc2 is also available at
>
> http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.6rc2/site/
>
> The corresponding tag in svn is
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_1_6RC2/
>
<snip/>
In trying to build the above with m1 as well as m2 (JDK 1.6) I get a
test failure [1].
-Rahul
[1]
Testcase: testGetInetAddres
(org.apache.commons.configuration.TestDataConfiguration): FAILED
ConversionException should be thrown for unknown hosts
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: ConversionException should be
thrown for unknown hosts
at org.apache.commons.configuration.TestDataConfiguration.testGetInetAddress(TestDataConfiguration.java:1689)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> Please cast your votes.
> TIA
> Oliver
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.6 based on RC2
Posted by Oliver Heger <ol...@oliver-heger.de>.
Ralph Goers wrote:
> I am working on more enhancements and will want to check them in fairly
> soon. Hopefully RC2 is OK, but I'm wondering if it wouldn't be better
> to do the release from a branch.
>
I'd say just go ahead. I think it is unlikely that some problems with
the RC are found now - I intend to close the vote tomorrow. And if there
was another issue, we could create a branch from the RC2 tag.
Oliver
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.6 based on RC2
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
I am working on more enhancements and will want to check them in
fairly soon. Hopefully RC2 is OK, but I'm wondering if it wouldn't be
better to do the release from a branch.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.6 based on RC2
Posted by Oliver Heger <ol...@oliver-heger.de>.
Adding my own +1.
Oliver
Oliver Heger schrieb:
> This is a vote for releasing Commons Configuration 1.6 based on the 2nd
> release candidate.
>
> Changes since RC1 are the following:
> - Problems reported by the RAT report have been addressed.
> - Some problems reported by findbugs have been fixed. Findbugs still
> reports some issues, but the remaining ones are either uncritical or
> would need binary incompatible changes.
> - CONFIGURATION-353 was fixed.
>
> The artifacts (including release notes and a clirr report) can be found
> here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.6rc2/
>
> The site for 1.6rc2 is also available at
>
> http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.6rc2/site/
>
> The corresponding tag in svn is
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_1_6RC2/
>
>
> Please cast your votes.
> TIA
> Oliver
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org