You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2004/12/13 14:56:09 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32663] New: -
Why are the methods of TTest not static?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32663>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32663
Summary: Why are the methods of TTest not static?
Product: Commons
Version: 1.0 Final
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Math
AssignedTo: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
ReportedBy: M.E.Foster@ed.ac.uk
To do T-tests on data -- for which many thanks! -- you currently have to do the
following
TTest tester = new TTestImpl();
tester.pairedTTest( ... );
There are two things that are inelegant about this implementation: you have to
explicitly call "new TTestImpl()" instead of using a factory method, and I don't
see why there's this whole interface-implementation paradigm at all. As far as I
can see, there's no state stored in the TTest implementation; why isn't it a
singleton class with static methods instead?
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org