Re: Subversion & CMake

[John Szakmeister <jo...@szakmeister.net>]

On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Branko Cibej<br...@xbc.nu> wrote:
[snip]
> If you were looking at SCons instead, that would be a lot more
> interesting; not least because APR-2.0 will most likely have a
> SCons-based build system.

I had no idea APR was thinking of doing that!  Personally, I've used
SCons for a long time with great success.  Whenever we get there, I'd
be happy to join in the effort to get SVN building with it.

-John

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2367011

Re: Subversion & CMake

["Hyrum K. Wright" <hy...@hyrumwright.org>]

On Jul 1, 2009, at 6:49 AM, John Szakmeister wrote:

> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Branko Cibej<br...@xbc.nu> wrote:
> [snip]
>> If you were looking at SCons instead, that would be a lot more
>> interesting; not least because APR-2.0 will most likely have a
>> SCons-based build system.
>
> I had no idea APR was thinking of doing that!  Personally, I've used
> SCons for a long time with great success.  Whenever we get there, I'd
> be happy to join in the effort to get SVN building with it.

There's even an abandoned branch somebody started way-back-when to  
look into using SCons:
https://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/branches/scons-build-system/

-Hyrum

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2367023