You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ratis.apache.org by runzhiwang <ru...@gmail.com> on 2021/03/16 01:05:03 UTC
[VOTE] Apache Ratis Release 2.0.0 rc4
Hi Apache Ratis PMC,
I am calling a vote for Apache Ratis Release 2.0.0 rc4.
The source and binary tarballs can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ratis/2.0.0/rc4/
Maven artifacts are staged at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheratis-1059
The git commit hash:
https://github.com/apache/ratis/commit/0c9913f602a49231621323bc903d91d5bbb06cb7
The public key used for signing the artifacts can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ratis/KEYS
The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts:
AE0E DABE 10AD 80F5 1A60 1B0A 22E1 ADB0 C3AC 338A
The RC4 tag in github is at:
https://github.com/apache/ratis/releases/tag/ratis-2.0.0-rc4
This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
Please vote on releasing this RC. Thank you in advance.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Starting with my +1(binding).
Regards,
runzhiwang
Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Release 2.0.0 rc4
Posted by runzhiwang <ru...@gmail.com>.
Thank you all for voting on the Apache Ratis Release 2.0.0 rc4.
Vote passes with
7 +1 binding votes
2 +1 non-binding votes
0 -1 votes
+1 votes from
Elek Marton (binding)
Shashikant Banerjee (binding)
Lokesh Jain (binding)
Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze (binding)
Xiaoyu Yao (binding)
Hanisha Koneru (binding)
Runzhiwang (binding)
Chris Nauroth (non-binding)
Rui Wang (non-binding)
Regards
runzhiwang
Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com> 于2021年3月23日周二 下午12:09写道：
> Hi runzhiwang,
>
> I checked the vulnerabilities. Both vulnerabilities are related to Http so
> that Ratis is not affected as mentioned by Marton. I agree that we can
> continue the release. Thanks a lot.
>
> Tsz-Wo
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 10:52 AM runzhiwang <ru...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > > As far as I understood Ratis/Ozone are not affected by these
> > > vulnerabilities.
> >
> > > I am +1 to create new ratis-thirdparty release, but IMHO we don't need
> > > to cancel the current 2.0.0 vote, we can close it and release the
> > > artifacts
> >
> > @Tsz-wo What do you think ?
> >
> > Arpit Agarwal <aa...@cloudera.com.invalid> 于2021年3月23日周二 上午5:58写道：
> >
> > > Can we conclude this vote now?
> > >
> > > > On Mar 22, 2021, at 7:38 AM, Elek, Marton <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 3/20/21 3:48 AM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
> > > >> In https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1342 , we have
> bumped
> > > Netty
> > > >> version to 4.1.60.Final in ratis-thirdparty due to the Netty
> > > >> vulnerabilities.
> > > >> -
> > > https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-5mcr-gq6c-3hq2
> > > >> -
> > > https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-wm47-8v5p-wjpj
> > > >> Should we also have a ratis-thridparty release?
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > As far as I understood Ratis/Ozone are not affected by these
> > > vulnerabilities.
> > > >
> > > > I am +1 to create new ratis-thirdparty release, but IMHO we don't
> need
> > > to cancel the current 2.0.0 vote, we can close it and release the
> > > artifacts...
> > > >
> > > > Marton
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Release 2.0.0 rc4
Posted by Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com>.
Hi runzhiwang,
I checked the vulnerabilities. Both vulnerabilities are related to Http so
that Ratis is not affected as mentioned by Marton. I agree that we can
continue the release. Thanks a lot.
Tsz-Wo
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 10:52 AM runzhiwang <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > As far as I understood Ratis/Ozone are not affected by these
> > vulnerabilities.
>
> > I am +1 to create new ratis-thirdparty release, but IMHO we don't need
> > to cancel the current 2.0.0 vote, we can close it and release the
> > artifacts
>
> @Tsz-wo What do you think ?
>
> Arpit Agarwal <aa...@cloudera.com.invalid> 于2021年3月23日周二 上午5:58写道：
>
> > Can we conclude this vote now?
> >
> > > On Mar 22, 2021, at 7:38 AM, Elek, Marton <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 3/20/21 3:48 AM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
> > >> In https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1342 , we have bumped
> > Netty
> > >> version to 4.1.60.Final in ratis-thirdparty due to the Netty
> > >> vulnerabilities.
> > >> -
> > https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-5mcr-gq6c-3hq2
> > >> -
> > https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-wm47-8v5p-wjpj
> > >> Should we also have a ratis-thridparty release?
> > >>
> > >
> > > As far as I understood Ratis/Ozone are not affected by these
> > vulnerabilities.
> > >
> > > I am +1 to create new ratis-thirdparty release, but IMHO we don't need
> > to cancel the current 2.0.0 vote, we can close it and release the
> > artifacts...
> > >
> > > Marton
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Release 2.0.0 rc4
Posted by runzhiwang <ru...@gmail.com>.
> As far as I understood Ratis/Ozone are not affected by these
> vulnerabilities.
> I am +1 to create new ratis-thirdparty release, but IMHO we don't need
> to cancel the current 2.0.0 vote, we can close it and release the
> artifacts
@Tsz-wo What do you think ?
Arpit Agarwal <aa...@cloudera.com.invalid> 于2021年3月23日周二 上午5:58写道：
> Can we conclude this vote now?
>
> > On Mar 22, 2021, at 7:38 AM, Elek, Marton <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 3/20/21 3:48 AM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
> >> In https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1342 , we have bumped
> Netty
> >> version to 4.1.60.Final in ratis-thirdparty due to the Netty
> >> vulnerabilities.
> >> -
> https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-5mcr-gq6c-3hq2
> >> -
> https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-wm47-8v5p-wjpj
> >> Should we also have a ratis-thridparty release?
> >>
> >
> > As far as I understood Ratis/Ozone are not affected by these
> vulnerabilities.
> >
> > I am +1 to create new ratis-thirdparty release, but IMHO we don't need
> to cancel the current 2.0.0 vote, we can close it and release the
> artifacts...
> >
> > Marton
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Release 2.0.0 rc4
Posted by Arpit Agarwal <aa...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
Can we conclude this vote now?
> On Mar 22, 2021, at 7:38 AM, Elek, Marton <el...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/20/21 3:48 AM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
>> In https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1342 , we have bumped Netty
>> version to 4.1.60.Final in ratis-thirdparty due to the Netty
>> vulnerabilities.
>> - https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-5mcr-gq6c-3hq2
>> - https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-wm47-8v5p-wjpj
>> Should we also have a ratis-thridparty release?
>>
>
> As far as I understood Ratis/Ozone are not affected by these vulnerabilities.
>
> I am +1 to create new ratis-thirdparty release, but IMHO we don't need to cancel the current 2.0.0 vote, we can close it and release the artifacts...
>
> Marton
Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Release 2.0.0 rc4
Posted by "Elek, Marton" <el...@apache.org>.
On 3/20/21 3:48 AM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
> In https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1342 , we have bumped Netty
> version to 4.1.60.Final in ratis-thirdparty due to the Netty
> vulnerabilities.
> - https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-5mcr-gq6c-3hq2
> - https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-wm47-8v5p-wjpj
>
> Should we also have a ratis-thridparty release?
>
As far as I understood Ratis/Ozone are not affected by these
vulnerabilities.
I am +1 to create new ratis-thirdparty release, but IMHO we don't need
to cancel the current 2.0.0 vote, we can close it and release the
artifacts...
Marton
Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Release 2.0.0 rc4
Posted by Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com>.
In https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1342 , we have bumped Netty
version to 4.1.60.Final in ratis-thirdparty due to the Netty
vulnerabilities.
- https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-5mcr-gq6c-3hq2
- https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-wm47-8v5p-wjpj
Should we also have a ratis-thridparty release?
Tsz-Wo
On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 12:07 AM Hanisha Koneru
<hk...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote:
> Thanks runzhiwang for rolling out the RC.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Verified checksums and signatures
> - Built from source
> - Ran sanity checks (arithmetic and filestore examples)
>
> Thanks
> Hanisha
>
> > On Mar 18, 2021, at 7:07 PM, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > -verify signature and checksums: ok
> > - build from source: ok
> >
> > Question: why Ratis publishes jars to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist
> > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ratis/2.0.0/rc4/> even if Ratis
> > will be published to maven repo?
> >
> >
> > -Rui
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 4:29 PM Xiaoyu Yao <xy...@cloudera.com.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> - Verified all checksums and signatures.
> >> - Checked DISCLAIMER, LICENSE and NOTICE.
> >> - Built from source successfully.
> >> - Ran filestore and the arithmetic examples.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Xiaoyu
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 6:48 AM Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 (binding)
> >>>
> >>> - Verified all checksums and signatures.
> >>> - Checked DISCLAIMER, LICENSE and NOTICE.
> >>> - Built from source successfully.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks a lot for rolling the rc!
> >>> Tsz-Wo
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 7:03 PM Lokesh Jain <ljain@cloudera.com.invalid
> >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Thanks runzhiwang for working on the release!
> >>>>
> >>>> +1 (binding)
> >>>>
> >>>> - Verified checksum
> >>>> - Built from source
> >>>> - Ran arithmetic and filestore examples
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards
> >>>> Lokesh
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 18-Mar-2021, at 3:44 PM, Shashikant Banerjee <
> >>> sbanerjee@cloudera.com.INVALID>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +1 (binding)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> * checked signatures
> >>>>> * verified checksums
> >>>>> * Compiled Ratis from source
> >>>>> * Ran RaftConfigurationChange tests.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks @runzhiwang(王杰) <ru...@tencent.com> for putting this rc
> >>>>> together.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks
> >>>>> Shashi
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 12:18 AM Chris Nauroth <cn...@apache.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> * Verified PGP signatures for binary and source tarball.
> >>>>>> * Verified checksums for binary and source tarball.
> >>>>>> * Confirmed year 2021 in NOTICE file.
> >>>>>> * Successfully built from source and ran tests.
> >>>>>> * Confirmed fix for RATIS-1147: TestMultiRaftGroup on
> >>>>>> MiniRaftClusterWithNetty is no longer failing.
> >>>>>> * Confirmed presence of fix for RATIS-1332: Ratis server couln't be
> >>>>>> recovered from failed initialization state.
> >>>>>> * Manually tested by running FileStore, Arithmetic, and Counter
> >>>> examples.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thank you for your diligence on these release candidates,
> >> runzhiwang.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Chris Nauroth
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 6:39 AM Elek, Marton <el...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> +1 (binding)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> * checked the signatures
> >>>>>>> * checked the checksums (note: checksum files are not "sha512sum
> >> -c"
> >>>>>>> compatible)
> >>>>>>> * Compiled Ratis from the source
> >>>>>>> * Compared source package with the content of the tagged commit
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> * Executed full Ozone CI test suite on a branch which used the
> >>> staged
> >>>>>>> artifacts: https://github.com/elek/ozone/actions/runs/657324335
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> * Deployed Ozone to Kubernetes and executed simple freon test.
> >>> Worked
> >>>>>>> well. (previous annoying NPE has been disappeared <3 + ratis dead
> >>> lock
> >>>>>>> disappeared <3)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ozone version
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Source code repository https://github.com/apache/ozone.git -r
> >>>>>>> ca6026d55f32520e9a28a7d0936da04ff5a2e90e
> >>>>>>> Compiled by root on 2021-03-16T13:07Z
> >>>>>>> Compiled with protoc 2.5.0
> >>>>>>> From source with checksum cd133d775af90a27db52eebe6b95f
> >>>>>>> With Apache Ratis: 2.0.0 from
> >>> 0c9913f602a49231621323bc903d91d5bbb06cb7
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks for this next rc,
> >>>>>>> Marton
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Release 2.0.0 rc4
Posted by Hanisha Koneru <hk...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
Thanks runzhiwang for rolling out the RC.
+1 (binding)
- Verified checksums and signatures
- Built from source
- Ran sanity checks (arithmetic and filestore examples)
Thanks
Hanisha
> On Mar 18, 2021, at 7:07 PM, Rui Wang <am...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> -verify signature and checksums: ok
> - build from source: ok
>
> Question: why Ratis publishes jars to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist
> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ratis/2.0.0/rc4/> even if Ratis
> will be published to maven repo?
>
>
> -Rui
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 4:29 PM Xiaoyu Yao <xy...@cloudera.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> - Verified all checksums and signatures.
>> - Checked DISCLAIMER, LICENSE and NOTICE.
>> - Built from source successfully.
>> - Ran filestore and the arithmetic examples.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Xiaoyu
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 6:48 AM Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> - Verified all checksums and signatures.
>>> - Checked DISCLAIMER, LICENSE and NOTICE.
>>> - Built from source successfully.
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot for rolling the rc!
>>> Tsz-Wo
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 7:03 PM Lokesh Jain <lj...@cloudera.com.invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks runzhiwang for working on the release!
>>>>
>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>
>>>> - Verified checksum
>>>> - Built from source
>>>> - Ran arithmetic and filestore examples
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Lokesh
>>>>
>>>>> On 18-Mar-2021, at 3:44 PM, Shashikant Banerjee <
>>> sbanerjee@cloudera.com.INVALID>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> * checked signatures
>>>>> * verified checksums
>>>>> * Compiled Ratis from source
>>>>> * Ran RaftConfigurationChange tests.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks @runzhiwang(王杰) <ru...@tencent.com> for putting this rc
>>>>> together.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Shashi
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 12:18 AM Chris Nauroth <cn...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * Verified PGP signatures for binary and source tarball.
>>>>>> * Verified checksums for binary and source tarball.
>>>>>> * Confirmed year 2021 in NOTICE file.
>>>>>> * Successfully built from source and ran tests.
>>>>>> * Confirmed fix for RATIS-1147: TestMultiRaftGroup on
>>>>>> MiniRaftClusterWithNetty is no longer failing.
>>>>>> * Confirmed presence of fix for RATIS-1332: Ratis server couln't be
>>>>>> recovered from failed initialization state.
>>>>>> * Manually tested by running FileStore, Arithmetic, and Counter
>>>> examples.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you for your diligence on these release candidates,
>> runzhiwang.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Chris Nauroth
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 6:39 AM Elek, Marton <el...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * checked the signatures
>>>>>>> * checked the checksums (note: checksum files are not "sha512sum
>> -c"
>>>>>>> compatible)
>>>>>>> * Compiled Ratis from the source
>>>>>>> * Compared source package with the content of the tagged commit
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * Executed full Ozone CI test suite on a branch which used the
>>> staged
>>>>>>> artifacts: https://github.com/elek/ozone/actions/runs/657324335
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * Deployed Ozone to Kubernetes and executed simple freon test.
>>> Worked
>>>>>>> well. (previous annoying NPE has been disappeared <3 + ratis dead
>>> lock
>>>>>>> disappeared <3)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ozone version
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Source code repository https://github.com/apache/ozone.git -r
>>>>>>> ca6026d55f32520e9a28a7d0936da04ff5a2e90e
>>>>>>> Compiled by root on 2021-03-16T13:07Z
>>>>>>> Compiled with protoc 2.5.0
>>>>>>> From source with checksum cd133d775af90a27db52eebe6b95f
>>>>>>> With Apache Ratis: 2.0.0 from
>>> 0c9913f602a49231621323bc903d91d5bbb06cb7
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for this next rc,
>>>>>>> Marton
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Release 2.0.0 rc4
Posted by Rui Wang <am...@apache.org>.
+1 (non-binding)
-verify signature and checksums: ok
- build from source: ok
Question: why Ratis publishes jars to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist
<https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ratis/2.0.0/rc4/> even if Ratis
will be published to maven repo?
-Rui
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 4:29 PM Xiaoyu Yao <xy...@cloudera.com.invalid>
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Verified all checksums and signatures.
> - Checked DISCLAIMER, LICENSE and NOTICE.
> - Built from source successfully.
> - Ran filestore and the arithmetic examples.
>
> Thanks,
> Xiaoyu
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 6:48 AM Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > - Verified all checksums and signatures.
> > - Checked DISCLAIMER, LICENSE and NOTICE.
> > - Built from source successfully.
> >
> > Thanks a lot for rolling the rc!
> > Tsz-Wo
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 7:03 PM Lokesh Jain <lj...@cloudera.com.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks runzhiwang for working on the release!
> > >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > - Verified checksum
> > > - Built from source
> > > - Ran arithmetic and filestore examples
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Lokesh
> > >
> > > > On 18-Mar-2021, at 3:44 PM, Shashikant Banerjee <
> > sbanerjee@cloudera.com.INVALID>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1 (binding)
> > > >
> > > > * checked signatures
> > > > * verified checksums
> > > > * Compiled Ratis from source
> > > > * Ran RaftConfigurationChange tests.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks @runzhiwang(王杰) <ru...@tencent.com> for putting this rc
> > > > together.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Shashi
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 12:18 AM Chris Nauroth <cn...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> +1 (non-binding)
> > > >>
> > > >> * Verified PGP signatures for binary and source tarball.
> > > >> * Verified checksums for binary and source tarball.
> > > >> * Confirmed year 2021 in NOTICE file.
> > > >> * Successfully built from source and ran tests.
> > > >> * Confirmed fix for RATIS-1147: TestMultiRaftGroup on
> > > >> MiniRaftClusterWithNetty is no longer failing.
> > > >> * Confirmed presence of fix for RATIS-1332: Ratis server couln't be
> > > >> recovered from failed initialization state.
> > > >> * Manually tested by running FileStore, Arithmetic, and Counter
> > > examples.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thank you for your diligence on these release candidates,
> runzhiwang.
> > > >>
> > > >> Chris Nauroth
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 6:39 AM Elek, Marton <el...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> +1 (binding)
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> * checked the signatures
> > > >>> * checked the checksums (note: checksum files are not "sha512sum
> -c"
> > > >>> compatible)
> > > >>> * Compiled Ratis from the source
> > > >>> * Compared source package with the content of the tagged commit
> > > >>>
> > > >>> * Executed full Ozone CI test suite on a branch which used the
> > staged
> > > >>> artifacts: https://github.com/elek/ozone/actions/runs/657324335
> > > >>>
> > > >>> * Deployed Ozone to Kubernetes and executed simple freon test.
> > Worked
> > > >>> well. (previous annoying NPE has been disappeared <3 + ratis dead
> > lock
> > > >>> disappeared <3)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> ozone version
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Source code repository https://github.com/apache/ozone.git -r
> > > >>> ca6026d55f32520e9a28a7d0936da04ff5a2e90e
> > > >>> Compiled by root on 2021-03-16T13:07Z
> > > >>> Compiled with protoc 2.5.0
> > > >>> From source with checksum cd133d775af90a27db52eebe6b95f
> > > >>> With Apache Ratis: 2.0.0 from
> > 0c9913f602a49231621323bc903d91d5bbb06cb7
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks for this next rc,
> > > >>> Marton
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Release 2.0.0 rc4
Posted by Xiaoyu Yao <xy...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
+1 (binding)
- Verified all checksums and signatures.
- Checked DISCLAIMER, LICENSE and NOTICE.
- Built from source successfully.
- Ran filestore and the arithmetic examples.
Thanks,
Xiaoyu
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 6:48 AM Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Verified all checksums and signatures.
> - Checked DISCLAIMER, LICENSE and NOTICE.
> - Built from source successfully.
>
> Thanks a lot for rolling the rc!
> Tsz-Wo
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 7:03 PM Lokesh Jain <lj...@cloudera.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks runzhiwang for working on the release!
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > - Verified checksum
> > - Built from source
> > - Ran arithmetic and filestore examples
> >
> > Regards
> > Lokesh
> >
> > > On 18-Mar-2021, at 3:44 PM, Shashikant Banerjee <
> sbanerjee@cloudera.com.INVALID>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > * checked signatures
> > > * verified checksums
> > > * Compiled Ratis from source
> > > * Ran RaftConfigurationChange tests.
> > >
> > > Thanks @runzhiwang(王杰) <ru...@tencent.com> for putting this rc
> > > together.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Shashi
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 12:18 AM Chris Nauroth <cn...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>
> > >> * Verified PGP signatures for binary and source tarball.
> > >> * Verified checksums for binary and source tarball.
> > >> * Confirmed year 2021 in NOTICE file.
> > >> * Successfully built from source and ran tests.
> > >> * Confirmed fix for RATIS-1147: TestMultiRaftGroup on
> > >> MiniRaftClusterWithNetty is no longer failing.
> > >> * Confirmed presence of fix for RATIS-1332: Ratis server couln't be
> > >> recovered from failed initialization state.
> > >> * Manually tested by running FileStore, Arithmetic, and Counter
> > examples.
> > >>
> > >> Thank you for your diligence on these release candidates, runzhiwang.
> > >>
> > >> Chris Nauroth
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 6:39 AM Elek, Marton <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> +1 (binding)
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> * checked the signatures
> > >>> * checked the checksums (note: checksum files are not "sha512sum -c"
> > >>> compatible)
> > >>> * Compiled Ratis from the source
> > >>> * Compared source package with the content of the tagged commit
> > >>>
> > >>> * Executed full Ozone CI test suite on a branch which used the
> staged
> > >>> artifacts: https://github.com/elek/ozone/actions/runs/657324335
> > >>>
> > >>> * Deployed Ozone to Kubernetes and executed simple freon test.
> Worked
> > >>> well. (previous annoying NPE has been disappeared <3 + ratis dead
> lock
> > >>> disappeared <3)
> > >>>
> > >>> ozone version
> > >>>
> > >>> Source code repository https://github.com/apache/ozone.git -r
> > >>> ca6026d55f32520e9a28a7d0936da04ff5a2e90e
> > >>> Compiled by root on 2021-03-16T13:07Z
> > >>> Compiled with protoc 2.5.0
> > >>> From source with checksum cd133d775af90a27db52eebe6b95f
> > >>> With Apache Ratis: 2.0.0 from
> 0c9913f602a49231621323bc903d91d5bbb06cb7
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks for this next rc,
> > >>> Marton
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Release 2.0.0 rc4
Posted by Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
- Verified all checksums and signatures.
- Checked DISCLAIMER, LICENSE and NOTICE.
- Built from source successfully.
Thanks a lot for rolling the rc!
Tsz-Wo
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 7:03 PM Lokesh Jain <lj...@cloudera.com.invalid>
wrote:
> Thanks runzhiwang for working on the release!
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Verified checksum
> - Built from source
> - Ran arithmetic and filestore examples
>
> Regards
> Lokesh
>
> > On 18-Mar-2021, at 3:44 PM, Shashikant Banerjee <sb...@cloudera.com.INVALID>
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > * checked signatures
> > * verified checksums
> > * Compiled Ratis from source
> > * Ran RaftConfigurationChange tests.
> >
> > Thanks @runzhiwang(王杰) <ru...@tencent.com> for putting this rc
> > together.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Shashi
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 12:18 AM Chris Nauroth <cn...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (non-binding)
> >>
> >> * Verified PGP signatures for binary and source tarball.
> >> * Verified checksums for binary and source tarball.
> >> * Confirmed year 2021 in NOTICE file.
> >> * Successfully built from source and ran tests.
> >> * Confirmed fix for RATIS-1147: TestMultiRaftGroup on
> >> MiniRaftClusterWithNetty is no longer failing.
> >> * Confirmed presence of fix for RATIS-1332: Ratis server couln't be
> >> recovered from failed initialization state.
> >> * Manually tested by running FileStore, Arithmetic, and Counter
> examples.
> >>
> >> Thank you for your diligence on these release candidates, runzhiwang.
> >>
> >> Chris Nauroth
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 6:39 AM Elek, Marton <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 (binding)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> * checked the signatures
> >>> * checked the checksums (note: checksum files are not "sha512sum -c"
> >>> compatible)
> >>> * Compiled Ratis from the source
> >>> * Compared source package with the content of the tagged commit
> >>>
> >>> * Executed full Ozone CI test suite on a branch which used the staged
> >>> artifacts: https://github.com/elek/ozone/actions/runs/657324335
> >>>
> >>> * Deployed Ozone to Kubernetes and executed simple freon test. Worked
> >>> well. (previous annoying NPE has been disappeared <3 + ratis dead lock
> >>> disappeared <3)
> >>>
> >>> ozone version
> >>>
> >>> Source code repository https://github.com/apache/ozone.git -r
> >>> ca6026d55f32520e9a28a7d0936da04ff5a2e90e
> >>> Compiled by root on 2021-03-16T13:07Z
> >>> Compiled with protoc 2.5.0
> >>> From source with checksum cd133d775af90a27db52eebe6b95f
> >>> With Apache Ratis: 2.0.0 from 0c9913f602a49231621323bc903d91d5bbb06cb7
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for this next rc,
> >>> Marton
> >>>
> >>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Release 2.0.0 rc4
Posted by Lokesh Jain <lj...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
Thanks runzhiwang for working on the release!
+1 (binding)
- Verified checksum
- Built from source
- Ran arithmetic and filestore examples
Regards
Lokesh
> On 18-Mar-2021, at 3:44 PM, Shashikant Banerjee <sb...@cloudera.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> * checked signatures
> * verified checksums
> * Compiled Ratis from source
> * Ran RaftConfigurationChange tests.
>
> Thanks @runzhiwang(王杰) <ru...@tencent.com> for putting this rc
> together.
>
> Thanks
> Shashi
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 12:18 AM Chris Nauroth <cn...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> * Verified PGP signatures for binary and source tarball.
>> * Verified checksums for binary and source tarball.
>> * Confirmed year 2021 in NOTICE file.
>> * Successfully built from source and ran tests.
>> * Confirmed fix for RATIS-1147: TestMultiRaftGroup on
>> MiniRaftClusterWithNetty is no longer failing.
>> * Confirmed presence of fix for RATIS-1332: Ratis server couln't be
>> recovered from failed initialization state.
>> * Manually tested by running FileStore, Arithmetic, and Counter examples.
>>
>> Thank you for your diligence on these release candidates, runzhiwang.
>>
>> Chris Nauroth
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 6:39 AM Elek, Marton <el...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>>
>>> * checked the signatures
>>> * checked the checksums (note: checksum files are not "sha512sum -c"
>>> compatible)
>>> * Compiled Ratis from the source
>>> * Compared source package with the content of the tagged commit
>>>
>>> * Executed full Ozone CI test suite on a branch which used the staged
>>> artifacts: https://github.com/elek/ozone/actions/runs/657324335
>>>
>>> * Deployed Ozone to Kubernetes and executed simple freon test. Worked
>>> well. (previous annoying NPE has been disappeared <3 + ratis dead lock
>>> disappeared <3)
>>>
>>> ozone version
>>>
>>> Source code repository https://github.com/apache/ozone.git -r
>>> ca6026d55f32520e9a28a7d0936da04ff5a2e90e
>>> Compiled by root on 2021-03-16T13:07Z
>>> Compiled with protoc 2.5.0
>>> From source with checksum cd133d775af90a27db52eebe6b95f
>>> With Apache Ratis: 2.0.0 from 0c9913f602a49231621323bc903d91d5bbb06cb7
>>>
>>> Thanks for this next rc,
>>> Marton
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Release 2.0.0 rc4
Posted by Shashikant Banerjee <sb...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
+1 (binding)
* checked signatures
* verified checksums
* Compiled Ratis from source
* Ran RaftConfigurationChange tests.
Thanks @runzhiwang(王杰) <ru...@tencent.com> for putting this rc
together.
Thanks
Shashi
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 12:18 AM Chris Nauroth <cn...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> * Verified PGP signatures for binary and source tarball.
> * Verified checksums for binary and source tarball.
> * Confirmed year 2021 in NOTICE file.
> * Successfully built from source and ran tests.
> * Confirmed fix for RATIS-1147: TestMultiRaftGroup on
> MiniRaftClusterWithNetty is no longer failing.
> * Confirmed presence of fix for RATIS-1332: Ratis server couln't be
> recovered from failed initialization state.
> * Manually tested by running FileStore, Arithmetic, and Counter examples.
>
> Thank you for your diligence on these release candidates, runzhiwang.
>
> Chris Nauroth
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 6:39 AM Elek, Marton <el...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> >
> > * checked the signatures
> > * checked the checksums (note: checksum files are not "sha512sum -c"
> > compatible)
> > * Compiled Ratis from the source
> > * Compared source package with the content of the tagged commit
> >
> > * Executed full Ozone CI test suite on a branch which used the staged
> > artifacts: https://github.com/elek/ozone/actions/runs/657324335
> >
> > * Deployed Ozone to Kubernetes and executed simple freon test. Worked
> > well. (previous annoying NPE has been disappeared <3 + ratis dead lock
> > disappeared <3)
> >
> > ozone version
> >
> > Source code repository https://github.com/apache/ozone.git -r
> > ca6026d55f32520e9a28a7d0936da04ff5a2e90e
> > Compiled by root on 2021-03-16T13:07Z
> > Compiled with protoc 2.5.0
> > From source with checksum cd133d775af90a27db52eebe6b95f
> > With Apache Ratis: 2.0.0 from 0c9913f602a49231621323bc903d91d5bbb06cb7
> >
> > Thanks for this next rc,
> > Marton
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Release 2.0.0 rc4
Posted by Chris Nauroth <cn...@apache.org>.
+1 (non-binding)
* Verified PGP signatures for binary and source tarball.
* Verified checksums for binary and source tarball.
* Confirmed year 2021 in NOTICE file.
* Successfully built from source and ran tests.
* Confirmed fix for RATIS-1147: TestMultiRaftGroup on
MiniRaftClusterWithNetty is no longer failing.
* Confirmed presence of fix for RATIS-1332: Ratis server couln't be
recovered from failed initialization state.
* Manually tested by running FileStore, Arithmetic, and Counter examples.
Thank you for your diligence on these release candidates, runzhiwang.
Chris Nauroth
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 6:39 AM Elek, Marton <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> * checked the signatures
> * checked the checksums (note: checksum files are not "sha512sum -c"
> compatible)
> * Compiled Ratis from the source
> * Compared source package with the content of the tagged commit
>
> * Executed full Ozone CI test suite on a branch which used the staged
> artifacts: https://github.com/elek/ozone/actions/runs/657324335
>
> * Deployed Ozone to Kubernetes and executed simple freon test. Worked
> well. (previous annoying NPE has been disappeared <3 + ratis dead lock
> disappeared <3)
>
> ozone version
>
> Source code repository https://github.com/apache/ozone.git -r
> ca6026d55f32520e9a28a7d0936da04ff5a2e90e
> Compiled by root on 2021-03-16T13:07Z
> Compiled with protoc 2.5.0
> From source with checksum cd133d775af90a27db52eebe6b95f
> With Apache Ratis: 2.0.0 from 0c9913f602a49231621323bc903d91d5bbb06cb7
>
> Thanks for this next rc,
> Marton
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Release 2.0.0 rc4
Posted by "Elek, Marton" <el...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding)
* checked the signatures
* checked the checksums (note: checksum files are not "sha512sum -c"
compatible)
* Compiled Ratis from the source
* Compared source package with the content of the tagged commit
* Executed full Ozone CI test suite on a branch which used the staged
artifacts: https://github.com/elek/ozone/actions/runs/657324335
* Deployed Ozone to Kubernetes and executed simple freon test. Worked
well. (previous annoying NPE has been disappeared <3 + ratis dead lock
disappeared <3)
ozone version
Source code repository https://github.com/apache/ozone.git -r
ca6026d55f32520e9a28a7d0936da04ff5a2e90e
Compiled by root on 2021-03-16T13:07Z
Compiled with protoc 2.5.0
From source with checksum cd133d775af90a27db52eebe6b95f
With Apache Ratis: 2.0.0 from 0c9913f602a49231621323bc903d91d5bbb06cb7
Thanks for this next rc,
Marton