You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@bloodhound.apache.org by Gary <ga...@wandisco.com> on 2012/04/15 22:00:56 UTC

Re: [Apache Bloodhound] #23: quick ticket should check for correct ticket module to use

There is also a bit of conversation in 
https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/23 which might be useful to 
talk about here too.

Cheers,
     Gary

On 15/04/12 20:09, Apache Bloodhound wrote:
> #23: quick ticket should check for correct ticket module to use
> ------------------------+-------------------------------------
>    Reporter:  gjm        |      Owner:  gjm
>        Type:  defect     |     Status:  new
>    Priority:  major      |  Milestone:  RC1 for initial release
>   Component:  dashboard  |    Version:
> Resolution:             |   Keywords:
> ------------------------+-------------------------------------
>
> Comment (by gjm):
>
>   I can't see any particular problem with subclassing a component,
>   particularly in the case where the parent class is meant to be deactivated
>   to when the subclass is active.
>
>   Meanwhile, I don't want to be attempting to find out what component is
>   associated with the /newticket path if we do not know that this is always
>   the correct path. I may misunderstand what is possible here of course.
>
>   A simple alternative to my suggestion in comment:2 would be to see if
>   Bloodhound's replacement !TicketModule is installed and active before
>   checking on the original !TicketModule.
>