You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Uwe Schindler (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/05/10 01:05:18 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-4872) BooleanWeight should decide how to
execute minNrShouldMatch
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-4872:
----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.3)
4.4
> BooleanWeight should decide how to execute minNrShouldMatch
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-4872
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4872
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: core/search
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Fix For: 5.0, 4.4
>
> Attachments: crazyMinShouldMatch.tasks
>
>
> LUCENE-4571 adds a dedicated document-at-time scorer for minNrShouldMatch which can use advance() behind the scenes.
> In cases where you have some really common terms and some rare ones this can be a huge performance improvement.
> On the other hand BooleanScorer might still be faster in some cases.
> We should think about what the logic should be here: one simple thing to do is to always use the new scorer when minShouldMatch is set: thats where i'm leaning.
> But maybe we could have a smarter heuristic too, perhaps based on cost()
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org