You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@phoenix.apache.org by "Swaroopa Kadam (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/04/17 23:39:00 UTC

[jira] [Assigned] (PHOENIX-5246) PhoenixAccessControllers.getAccessControllers() method is not correctly implementing the double-checked locking

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Swaroopa Kadam reassigned PHOENIX-5246:
---------------------------------------

    Assignee: Swaroopa Kadam

> PhoenixAccessControllers.getAccessControllers() method is not correctly implementing the double-checked locking
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-5246
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5246
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 4.14.0
>            Reporter: Thomas D'Silva
>            Assignee: Swaroopa Kadam
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: SFDC
>             Fix For: 4.15.0, 5.1.0, 4.14.2
>
>
> By [~elserj] on PHOENIX-5070: 
> This looks to me that the getAccessControllers() method is not correctly implementing the double-checked locking "approach" as per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-checked_locking#Usage_in_Java (the accessControllers variable must be volatile).
> If we want to avoid taking an explicit lock, what about using AtomicReference instead? Can we spin out another Jira issue to fix that?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)