You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to adffaces-issues@incubator.apache.org by "Scott O'Bryan (JIRA)" <ad...@incubator.apache.org> on 2007/04/05 23:22:32 UTC

[jira] Commented: (ADFFACES-442) Incorrect JavaDoc for Configurator

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12487118 ] 

Scott O'Bryan commented on ADFFACES-442:
----------------------------------------

Or rather it should read:

 Classes implementing this abstraction should be listed in the jar's /META-INF/services folder inside of a text file named "org.apache.trinidad.config.Configurator".

Sorry,
Scott

> Incorrect JavaDoc for Configurator
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ADFFACES-442
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-442
>             Project: MyFaces ADF-Faces
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Documentation
>            Reporter: Scott O'Bryan
>
> The class introduction in the Configurator javadoc says:
> Classes implementing this abstraction should be listed in the jar's /META-INF/services folder inside of a text file named "org.apache.trinidad.Configurator".
> The correct wording should be:
> Classes implementing this abstraction should be listed in the jar's /META-INF/services folder inside of a text file named "org.apache.trinidad.conf.Configurator".

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.