You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@wicket.apache.org by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> on 2007/09/07 13:53:38 UTC
Re: {wicket 1.3 beta 3} Howto add keywords No cache etc?
The most failsafe solution to the update image using Ajax request to
my mind is to add a random number to the url for the image (I thought
we already did that?).
Martijn
On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <ni...@jayway.dk> wrote:
> Hi
>
> How do I add keywords no-cache and etc, for a panel? Reason are that the
> panel carries a image and that gets cached so when my ajax call comes in
> and updates the model then the old image are shown..
>
> regards Nino
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
--
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta3 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta3/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: {wicket 1.3 beta 3} Howto add keywords No cache etc?
Posted by Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <ni...@jayway.dk>.
Hi Igor
Sorry for not explaining to detail. Yes by not working I mean that the
image will not refresh upon ajax refresh, the image are already on the
page it's contained within a panel. And this panel can be updated via
ajax via an selection in a dropdown. But since the image url does not
change on ajax refreshs the image are not updated. As I wrote if you
refresh the page image are reloaded by browser(firefox in this case).
I'havent fiddled with versioning...
regards Nino
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> you mean when you add Image using ajax it doesnt show up?
>
> being able to refresh something and it "not working" are two very different
> things. if you have a nonversioned page and Image in it you will have the
> exact same behavior because the url will remain stable - does that mean
> Image is broken in nonversioned pages? no! sometimes you want this behavior,
> that is why we provide NonCachingImage for the times when you dont.
>
> -igor
>
>
> On 9/10/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <ni...@jayway.dk>
> wrote:
>
>> I know(and agree), but I just feel that we should somehow warn people
>> that image won't work with ajax?
>>
>> regards Nino
>>
>> Matej Knopp wrote:
>>
>>> Again, try using NonCachingImage instead of Image. I does exacly what
>>> the suggested fix does. I just overlooked it.
>>>
>>> -Matej
>>>
>>> On 9/10/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
>>> <ni...@jayway.dk> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> No, it did not work for me using ajax. Until I added one of the
>>>> solutions described.
>>>>
>>>> Should I provide a quickstart?
>>>>
>>>> regards Nino
>>>>
>>>> Igor Vaynberg wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> as far as i know Image works just fine with ajax. if you want an image
>>>>>
>> that
>>
>>>>> is not cached use NonCachingImage.
>>>>>
>>>>> -igor
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9/9/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <
>>>>>
>> nino.martinez@jayway.dk>
>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> This has been rejected as invalid for fixing... But should'nt at
>>>>>>
>> least
>>
>>>>>> something have been added to the component. Currently Image are not
>>>>>> valid for ajax calls, and you wont see the problem until you catch it
>>>>>>
>> in
>>
>>>>>> your browser.. Either we write something in the javadocs or??? Could
>>>>>>
>> be
>>
>>>>>> nice to tell if the component did not work with ajax, somehow.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> regards Nino
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Matej Knopp wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, i guess with component path encoded in url, the milliseconds
>>>>>>>
>> could
>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> do ;)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Matej
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 9/7/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, but all those images will have a different url, or are they
>>>>>>>>
>> the
>>
>>>>>>>> same? The milliseconds parameter is only used to distinguish
>>>>>>>>
>> between
>>
>>>>>>>> requests, not within one.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Martijn
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 9/7/07, Matej Knopp <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Really? What's so odd about it? Say you have a page with 100
>>>>>>>>>
>> images.
>>
>>>>>>>>> How long do you think such page renders? It shouldn't take long
>>>>>>>>>
>> than
>>
>>>>>>>>> say 5 ms on a decent machine.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -Matej
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 9/7/07, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2 tags generating the same milisecond for the same
>>>>>>>>>>
>> client/session?
>>
>>>>>>>>>> that looks very very very odd to me.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> johan
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> nino.martinez@jayway.dk>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Actually we discussed that.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I suggested it but as Matej wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> don't think so. you can have two tags generated in same
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> millisecond.. As
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> for nano might be better, lesser chance for tags being generated
>>>>>>>>>>>
>> in
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> same nanosec. But whats wrong with autoindex?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Why not use System.currentTimeMillis()? Or if you are really
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> concerned
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> use nanotime.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Martijn
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> nino.martinez@jayway.dk>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> so no, talking to Matej on ##wicket, the fix was this:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Resolutions are these two :
>>>>>>>>>>>>> protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>> super.onComponentTag(tag);
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tag.put("src", tag.getString("src") + "&rand=" +
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Math.random());
>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> or event better since random could give duplicate results:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>> super.onComponentTag(tag);
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tag.put("src", tag.getString("src") + "&autoIndex=" +
>>>>>>>>>>>>> getPage().getAutoIndex());
>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Although im not sure if its safe to use autoIndex?I've put up
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> a
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> feature
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> request for it to be implemented.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-939
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Nino
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this is whats generated:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> http://localhost:8080/thirdparty-webapp/thirdParty/?wicket:interface=:4:form:phoneA:phoneThumb:image::IResourceListener
>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ::
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regards Nino
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The most failsafe solution to the update image using Ajax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> request to
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my mind is to add a random number to the url for the image
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> (I
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> thought
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we already did that?).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martijn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ni...@jayway.dk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do I add keywords no-cache and etc, for a panel? Reason
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> are
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> that
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> panel carries a image and that gets cached so when my ajax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> call
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comes in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and updates the model then the old image are shown..
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regards Nino
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
>>>>>>>> Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta3 is released
>>>>>>>> Get it now:
>>>>>>>>
>> http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta3/
>>
>>>>>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: {wicket 1.3 beta 3} Howto add keywords No cache etc?
Posted by Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>.
you mean when you add Image using ajax it doesnt show up?
being able to refresh something and it "not working" are two very different
things. if you have a nonversioned page and Image in it you will have the
exact same behavior because the url will remain stable - does that mean
Image is broken in nonversioned pages? no! sometimes you want this behavior,
that is why we provide NonCachingImage for the times when you dont.
-igor
On 9/10/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <ni...@jayway.dk>
wrote:
>
> I know(and agree), but I just feel that we should somehow warn people
> that image won't work with ajax?
>
> regards Nino
>
> Matej Knopp wrote:
> > Again, try using NonCachingImage instead of Image. I does exacly what
> > the suggested fix does. I just overlooked it.
> >
> > -Matej
> >
> > On 9/10/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
> > <ni...@jayway.dk> wrote:
> >
> >> No, it did not work for me using ajax. Until I added one of the
> >> solutions described.
> >>
> >> Should I provide a quickstart?
> >>
> >> regards Nino
> >>
> >> Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> >>
> >>> as far as i know Image works just fine with ajax. if you want an image
> that
> >>> is not cached use NonCachingImage.
> >>>
> >>> -igor
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 9/9/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <
> nino.martinez@jayway.dk>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> This has been rejected as invalid for fixing... But should'nt at
> least
> >>>> something have been added to the component. Currently Image are not
> >>>> valid for ajax calls, and you wont see the problem until you catch it
> in
> >>>> your browser.. Either we write something in the javadocs or??? Could
> be
> >>>> nice to tell if the component did not work with ajax, somehow.
> >>>>
> >>>> regards Nino
> >>>>
> >>>> Matej Knopp wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Well, i guess with component path encoded in url, the milliseconds
> could
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> do ;)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> -Matej
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 9/7/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Yes, but all those images will have a different url, or are they
> the
> >>>>>> same? The milliseconds parameter is only used to distinguish
> between
> >>>>>> requests, not within one.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Martijn
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 9/7/07, Matej Knopp <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Really? What's so odd about it? Say you have a page with 100
> images.
> >>>>>>> How long do you think such page renders? It shouldn't take long
> than
> >>>>>>> say 5 ms on a decent machine.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -Matej
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 9/7/07, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 2 tags generating the same milisecond for the same
> client/session?
> >>>>>>>> that looks very very very odd to me.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> johan
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>> nino.martinez@jayway.dk>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Actually we discussed that.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I suggested it but as Matej wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> don't think so. you can have two tags generated in same
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>> millisecond.. As
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>> for nano might be better, lesser chance for tags being generated
> in
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>> the
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>> same nanosec. But whats wrong with autoindex?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Why not use System.currentTimeMillis()? Or if you are really
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>> concerned
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> use nanotime.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Martijn
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>> nino.martinez@jayway.dk>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> so no, talking to Matej on ##wicket, the fix was this:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Resolutions are these two :
> >>>>>>>>>>> protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
> >>>>>>>>>>> super.onComponentTag(tag);
> >>>>>>>>>>> tag.put("src", tag.getString("src") + "&rand=" +
> >>>>>>>>>>> Math.random());
> >>>>>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> or event better since random could give duplicate results:
> >>>>>>>>>>> protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
> >>>>>>>>>>> super.onComponentTag(tag);
> >>>>>>>>>>> tag.put("src", tag.getString("src") + "&autoIndex=" +
> >>>>>>>>>>> getPage().getAutoIndex());
> >>>>>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>>>> Although im not sure if its safe to use autoIndex?I've put up
> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>> feature
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> request for it to be implemented.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-939
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> -Nino
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> this is whats generated:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>
> http://localhost:8080/thirdparty-webapp/thirdParty/?wicket:interface=:4:form:phoneA:phoneThumb:image::IResourceListener
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>> ::
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> regards Nino
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The most failsafe solution to the update image using Ajax
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>> request to
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> my mind is to add a random number to the url for the image
> (I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>> thought
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> we already did that?).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Martijn
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <ni...@jayway.dk> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do I add keywords no-cache and etc, for a panel? Reason
> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>> that
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> panel carries a image and that gets cached so when my ajax
> call
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> comes in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and updates the model then the old image are shown..
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> regards Nino
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
> >>>>>> Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta3 is released
> >>>>>> Get it now:
> http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta3/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
Re: {wicket 1.3 beta 3} Howto add keywords No cache etc?
Posted by Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <ni...@jayway.dk>.
I know(and agree), but I just feel that we should somehow warn people
that image won't work with ajax?
regards Nino
Matej Knopp wrote:
> Again, try using NonCachingImage instead of Image. I does exacly what
> the suggested fix does. I just overlooked it.
>
> -Matej
>
> On 9/10/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
> <ni...@jayway.dk> wrote:
>
>> No, it did not work for me using ajax. Until I added one of the
>> solutions described.
>>
>> Should I provide a quickstart?
>>
>> regards Nino
>>
>> Igor Vaynberg wrote:
>>
>>> as far as i know Image works just fine with ajax. if you want an image that
>>> is not cached use NonCachingImage.
>>>
>>> -igor
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/9/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <ni...@jayway.dk>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> This has been rejected as invalid for fixing... But should'nt at least
>>>> something have been added to the component. Currently Image are not
>>>> valid for ajax calls, and you wont see the problem until you catch it in
>>>> your browser.. Either we write something in the javadocs or??? Could be
>>>> nice to tell if the component did not work with ajax, somehow.
>>>>
>>>> regards Nino
>>>>
>>>> Matej Knopp wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Well, i guess with component path encoded in url, the milliseconds could
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> do ;)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> -Matej
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9/7/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, but all those images will have a different url, or are they the
>>>>>> same? The milliseconds parameter is only used to distinguish between
>>>>>> requests, not within one.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Martijn
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/7/07, Matej Knopp <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Really? What's so odd about it? Say you have a page with 100 images.
>>>>>>> How long do you think such page renders? It shouldn't take long than
>>>>>>> say 5 ms on a decent machine.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Matej
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 9/7/07, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2 tags generating the same milisecond for the same client/session?
>>>>>>>> that looks very very very odd to me.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> johan
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>> nino.martinez@jayway.dk>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Actually we discussed that.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I suggested it but as Matej wrote:
>>>>>>>>> don't think so. you can have two tags generated in same
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>> millisecond.. As
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> for nano might be better, lesser chance for tags being generated in
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>> the
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> same nanosec. But whats wrong with autoindex?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Why not use System.currentTimeMillis()? Or if you are really
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> concerned
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> use nanotime.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Martijn
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> nino.martinez@jayway.dk>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> so no, talking to Matej on ##wicket, the fix was this:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Resolutions are these two :
>>>>>>>>>>> protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
>>>>>>>>>>> super.onComponentTag(tag);
>>>>>>>>>>> tag.put("src", tag.getString("src") + "&rand=" +
>>>>>>>>>>> Math.random());
>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> or event better since random could give duplicate results:
>>>>>>>>>>> protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
>>>>>>>>>>> super.onComponentTag(tag);
>>>>>>>>>>> tag.put("src", tag.getString("src") + "&autoIndex=" +
>>>>>>>>>>> getPage().getAutoIndex());
>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>> Although im not sure if its safe to use autoIndex?I've put up a
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> feature
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> request for it to be implemented.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-939
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -Nino
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> this is whats generated:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> http://localhost:8080/thirdparty-webapp/thirdParty/?wicket:interface=:4:form:phoneA:phoneThumb:image::IResourceListener
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ::
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> regards Nino
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The most failsafe solution to the update image using Ajax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> request to
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> my mind is to add a random number to the url for the image (I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> thought
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> we already did that?).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martijn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ni...@jayway.dk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do I add keywords no-cache and etc, for a panel? Reason are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> that
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> panel carries a image and that gets cached so when my ajax call
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comes in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and updates the model then the old image are shown..
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regards Nino
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
>>>>>> Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta3 is released
>>>>>> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta3/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: {wicket 1.3 beta 3} Howto add keywords No cache etc?
Posted by Matej Knopp <ma...@gmail.com>.
Again, try using NonCachingImage instead of Image. I does exacly what
the suggested fix does. I just overlooked it.
-Matej
On 9/10/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
<ni...@jayway.dk> wrote:
> No, it did not work for me using ajax. Until I added one of the
> solutions described.
>
> Should I provide a quickstart?
>
> regards Nino
>
> Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> > as far as i know Image works just fine with ajax. if you want an image that
> > is not cached use NonCachingImage.
> >
> > -igor
> >
> >
> > On 9/9/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <ni...@jayway.dk>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> This has been rejected as invalid for fixing... But should'nt at least
> >> something have been added to the component. Currently Image are not
> >> valid for ajax calls, and you wont see the problem until you catch it in
> >> your browser.. Either we write something in the javadocs or??? Could be
> >> nice to tell if the component did not work with ajax, somehow.
> >>
> >> regards Nino
> >>
> >> Matej Knopp wrote:
> >>
> >>> Well, i guess with component path encoded in url, the milliseconds could
> >>>
> >> do ;)
> >>
> >>> -Matej
> >>>
> >>> On 9/7/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Yes, but all those images will have a different url, or are they the
> >>>> same? The milliseconds parameter is only used to distinguish between
> >>>> requests, not within one.
> >>>>
> >>>> Martijn
> >>>>
> >>>> On 9/7/07, Matej Knopp <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Really? What's so odd about it? Say you have a page with 100 images.
> >>>>> How long do you think such page renders? It shouldn't take long than
> >>>>> say 5 ms on a decent machine.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Matej
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 9/7/07, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> 2 tags generating the same milisecond for the same client/session?
> >>>>>> that looks very very very odd to me.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> johan
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <
> >>>>>>
> >> nino.martinez@jayway.dk>
> >>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Actually we discussed that.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I suggested it but as Matej wrote:
> >>>>>>> don't think so. you can have two tags generated in same
> >>>>>>>
> >> millisecond.. As
> >>
> >>>>>>> for nano might be better, lesser chance for tags being generated in
> >>>>>>>
> >> the
> >>
> >>>>>>> same nanosec. But whats wrong with autoindex?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Why not use System.currentTimeMillis()? Or if you are really
> >>>>>>>>
> >> concerned
> >>
> >>>>>>>> use nanotime.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Martijn
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <
> >>>>>>>>
> >> nino.martinez@jayway.dk>
> >>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> so no, talking to Matej on ##wicket, the fix was this:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Resolutions are these two :
> >>>>>>>>> protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
> >>>>>>>>> super.onComponentTag(tag);
> >>>>>>>>> tag.put("src", tag.getString("src") + "&rand=" +
> >>>>>>>>> Math.random());
> >>>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> or event better since random could give duplicate results:
> >>>>>>>>> protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
> >>>>>>>>> super.onComponentTag(tag);
> >>>>>>>>> tag.put("src", tag.getString("src") + "&autoIndex=" +
> >>>>>>>>> getPage().getAutoIndex());
> >>>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>> Although im not sure if its safe to use autoIndex?I've put up a
> >>>>>>>>>
> >> feature
> >>
> >>>>>>>>> request for it to be implemented.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-939
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> -Nino
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> this is whats generated:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> http://localhost:8080/thirdparty-webapp/thirdParty/?wicket:interface=:4:form:phoneA:phoneThumb:image::IResourceListener
> >>
> >>>>>>> ::
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> regards Nino
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> The most failsafe solution to the update image using Ajax
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> request to
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>>> my mind is to add a random number to the url for the image (I
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> thought
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>>> we already did that?).
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Martijn
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
> >>>>>>>>>>> <ni...@jayway.dk> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> How do I add keywords no-cache and etc, for a panel? Reason are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> that
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> panel carries a image and that gets cached so when my ajax call
> >>>>>>>>>>>> comes in
> >>>>>>>>>>>> and updates the model then the old image are shown..
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> regards Nino
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
> >>>> Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta3 is released
> >>>> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta3/
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: {wicket 1.3 beta 3} Howto add keywords No cache etc?
Posted by Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <ni...@jayway.dk>.
No, it did not work for me using ajax. Until I added one of the
solutions described.
Should I provide a quickstart?
regards Nino
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> as far as i know Image works just fine with ajax. if you want an image that
> is not cached use NonCachingImage.
>
> -igor
>
>
> On 9/9/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <ni...@jayway.dk>
> wrote:
>
>> This has been rejected as invalid for fixing... But should'nt at least
>> something have been added to the component. Currently Image are not
>> valid for ajax calls, and you wont see the problem until you catch it in
>> your browser.. Either we write something in the javadocs or??? Could be
>> nice to tell if the component did not work with ajax, somehow.
>>
>> regards Nino
>>
>> Matej Knopp wrote:
>>
>>> Well, i guess with component path encoded in url, the milliseconds could
>>>
>> do ;)
>>
>>> -Matej
>>>
>>> On 9/7/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Yes, but all those images will have a different url, or are they the
>>>> same? The milliseconds parameter is only used to distinguish between
>>>> requests, not within one.
>>>>
>>>> Martijn
>>>>
>>>> On 9/7/07, Matej Knopp <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Really? What's so odd about it? Say you have a page with 100 images.
>>>>> How long do you think such page renders? It shouldn't take long than
>>>>> say 5 ms on a decent machine.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Matej
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9/7/07, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> 2 tags generating the same milisecond for the same client/session?
>>>>>> that looks very very very odd to me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> johan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <
>>>>>>
>> nino.martinez@jayway.dk>
>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Actually we discussed that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I suggested it but as Matej wrote:
>>>>>>> don't think so. you can have two tags generated in same
>>>>>>>
>> millisecond.. As
>>
>>>>>>> for nano might be better, lesser chance for tags being generated in
>>>>>>>
>> the
>>
>>>>>>> same nanosec. But whats wrong with autoindex?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why not use System.currentTimeMillis()? Or if you are really
>>>>>>>>
>> concerned
>>
>>>>>>>> use nanotime.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Martijn
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <
>>>>>>>>
>> nino.martinez@jayway.dk>
>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> so no, talking to Matej on ##wicket, the fix was this:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Resolutions are these two :
>>>>>>>>> protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
>>>>>>>>> super.onComponentTag(tag);
>>>>>>>>> tag.put("src", tag.getString("src") + "&rand=" +
>>>>>>>>> Math.random());
>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> or event better since random could give duplicate results:
>>>>>>>>> protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
>>>>>>>>> super.onComponentTag(tag);
>>>>>>>>> tag.put("src", tag.getString("src") + "&autoIndex=" +
>>>>>>>>> getPage().getAutoIndex());
>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>> Although im not sure if its safe to use autoIndex?I've put up a
>>>>>>>>>
>> feature
>>
>>>>>>>>> request for it to be implemented.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-939
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -Nino
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> this is whats generated:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>> http://localhost:8080/thirdparty-webapp/thirdParty/?wicket:interface=:4:form:phoneA:phoneThumb:image::IResourceListener
>>
>>>>>>> ::
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> regards Nino
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The most failsafe solution to the update image using Ajax
>>>>>>>>>>>
>> request to
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> my mind is to add a random number to the url for the image (I
>>>>>>>>>>>
>> thought
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> we already did that?).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Martijn
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
>>>>>>>>>>> <ni...@jayway.dk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> How do I add keywords no-cache and etc, for a panel? Reason are
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> that
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> panel carries a image and that gets cached so when my ajax call
>>>>>>>>>>>> comes in
>>>>>>>>>>>> and updates the model then the old image are shown..
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> regards Nino
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
>>>> Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta3 is released
>>>> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta3/
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: {wicket 1.3 beta 3} Howto add keywords No cache etc?
Posted by Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>.
as far as i know Image works just fine with ajax. if you want an image that
is not cached use NonCachingImage.
-igor
On 9/9/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <ni...@jayway.dk>
wrote:
>
> This has been rejected as invalid for fixing... But should'nt at least
> something have been added to the component. Currently Image are not
> valid for ajax calls, and you wont see the problem until you catch it in
> your browser.. Either we write something in the javadocs or??? Could be
> nice to tell if the component did not work with ajax, somehow.
>
> regards Nino
>
> Matej Knopp wrote:
> > Well, i guess with component path encoded in url, the milliseconds could
> do ;)
> >
> > -Matej
> >
> > On 9/7/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Yes, but all those images will have a different url, or are they the
> >> same? The milliseconds parameter is only used to distinguish between
> >> requests, not within one.
> >>
> >> Martijn
> >>
> >> On 9/7/07, Matej Knopp <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Really? What's so odd about it? Say you have a page with 100 images.
> >>> How long do you think such page renders? It shouldn't take long than
> >>> say 5 ms on a decent machine.
> >>>
> >>> -Matej
> >>>
> >>> On 9/7/07, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> 2 tags generating the same milisecond for the same client/session?
> >>>> that looks very very very odd to me.
> >>>>
> >>>> johan
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <
> nino.martinez@jayway.dk>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Actually we discussed that.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I suggested it but as Matej wrote:
> >>>>> don't think so. you can have two tags generated in same
> millisecond.. As
> >>>>> for nano might be better, lesser chance for tags being generated in
> the
> >>>>> same nanosec. But whats wrong with autoindex?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Why not use System.currentTimeMillis()? Or if you are really
> concerned
> >>>>>> use nanotime.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Martijn
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <
> nino.martinez@jayway.dk>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> so no, talking to Matej on ##wicket, the fix was this:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Resolutions are these two :
> >>>>>>> protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
> >>>>>>> super.onComponentTag(tag);
> >>>>>>> tag.put("src", tag.getString("src") + "&rand=" +
> >>>>>>> Math.random());
> >>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> or event better since random could give duplicate results:
> >>>>>>> protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
> >>>>>>> super.onComponentTag(tag);
> >>>>>>> tag.put("src", tag.getString("src") + "&autoIndex=" +
> >>>>>>> getPage().getAutoIndex());
> >>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>> Although im not sure if its safe to use autoIndex?I've put up a
> feature
> >>>>>>> request for it to be implemented.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-939
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -Nino
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> this is whats generated:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> http://localhost:8080/thirdparty-webapp/thirdParty/?wicket:interface=:4:form:phoneA:phoneThumb:image::IResourceListener
> >>>>> ::
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>> regards Nino
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The most failsafe solution to the update image using Ajax
> request to
> >>>>>>>>> my mind is to add a random number to the url for the image (I
> thought
> >>>>>>>>> we already did that?).
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Martijn
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
> >>>>>>>>> <ni...@jayway.dk> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hi
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> How do I add keywords no-cache and etc, for a panel? Reason are
> that
> >>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> panel carries a image and that gets cached so when my ajax call
> >>>>>>>>>> comes in
> >>>>>>>>>> and updates the model then the old image are shown..
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> regards Nino
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> --
> >> Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
> >> Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta3 is released
> >> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta3/
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
Re: {wicket 1.3 beta 3} Howto add keywords No cache etc?
Posted by Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <ni...@jayway.dk>.
This has been rejected as invalid for fixing... But should'nt at least
something have been added to the component. Currently Image are not
valid for ajax calls, and you wont see the problem until you catch it in
your browser.. Either we write something in the javadocs or??? Could be
nice to tell if the component did not work with ajax, somehow.
regards Nino
Matej Knopp wrote:
> Well, i guess with component path encoded in url, the milliseconds could do ;)
>
> -Matej
>
> On 9/7/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes, but all those images will have a different url, or are they the
>> same? The milliseconds parameter is only used to distinguish between
>> requests, not within one.
>>
>> Martijn
>>
>> On 9/7/07, Matej Knopp <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Really? What's so odd about it? Say you have a page with 100 images.
>>> How long do you think such page renders? It shouldn't take long than
>>> say 5 ms on a decent machine.
>>>
>>> -Matej
>>>
>>> On 9/7/07, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> 2 tags generating the same milisecond for the same client/session?
>>>> that looks very very very odd to me.
>>>>
>>>> johan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <ni...@jayway.dk>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Actually we discussed that.
>>>>>
>>>>> I suggested it but as Matej wrote:
>>>>> don't think so. you can have two tags generated in same millisecond.. As
>>>>> for nano might be better, lesser chance for tags being generated in the
>>>>> same nanosec. But whats wrong with autoindex?
>>>>>
>>>>> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Why not use System.currentTimeMillis()? Or if you are really concerned
>>>>>> use nanotime.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Martijn
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <ni...@jayway.dk>
>>>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> so no, talking to Matej on ##wicket, the fix was this:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Resolutions are these two :
>>>>>>> protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
>>>>>>> super.onComponentTag(tag);
>>>>>>> tag.put("src", tag.getString("src") + "&rand=" +
>>>>>>> Math.random());
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> or event better since random could give duplicate results:
>>>>>>> protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
>>>>>>> super.onComponentTag(tag);
>>>>>>> tag.put("src", tag.getString("src") + "&autoIndex=" +
>>>>>>> getPage().getAutoIndex());
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>> Although im not sure if its safe to use autoIndex?I've put up a feature
>>>>>>> request for it to be implemented.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-939
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Nino
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> this is whats generated:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> http://localhost:8080/thirdparty-webapp/thirdParty/?wicket:interface=:4:form:phoneA:phoneThumb:image::IResourceListener
>>>>> ::
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> regards Nino
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The most failsafe solution to the update image using Ajax request to
>>>>>>>>> my mind is to add a random number to the url for the image (I thought
>>>>>>>>> we already did that?).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Martijn
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
>>>>>>>>> <ni...@jayway.dk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> How do I add keywords no-cache and etc, for a panel? Reason are that
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> panel carries a image and that gets cached so when my ajax call
>>>>>>>>>> comes in
>>>>>>>>>> and updates the model then the old image are shown..
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> regards Nino
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
>> Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta3 is released
>> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta3/
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: {wicket 1.3 beta 3} Howto add keywords No cache etc?
Posted by Matej Knopp <ma...@gmail.com>.
Well, i guess with component path encoded in url, the milliseconds could do ;)
-Matej
On 9/7/07, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, but all those images will have a different url, or are they the
> same? The milliseconds parameter is only used to distinguish between
> requests, not within one.
>
> Martijn
>
> On 9/7/07, Matej Knopp <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Really? What's so odd about it? Say you have a page with 100 images.
> > How long do you think such page renders? It shouldn't take long than
> > say 5 ms on a decent machine.
> >
> > -Matej
> >
> > On 9/7/07, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > 2 tags generating the same milisecond for the same client/session?
> > > that looks very very very odd to me.
> > >
> > > johan
> > >
> > >
> > > On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <ni...@jayway.dk>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Actually we discussed that.
> > > >
> > > > I suggested it but as Matej wrote:
> > > > don't think so. you can have two tags generated in same millisecond.. As
> > > > for nano might be better, lesser chance for tags being generated in the
> > > > same nanosec. But whats wrong with autoindex?
> > > >
> > > > Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> > > > > Why not use System.currentTimeMillis()? Or if you are really concerned
> > > > > use nanotime.
> > > > >
> > > > > Martijn
> > > > >
> > > > > On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <ni...@jayway.dk>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> so no, talking to Matej on ##wicket, the fix was this:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Resolutions are these two :
> > > > >> protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
> > > > >> super.onComponentTag(tag);
> > > > >> tag.put("src", tag.getString("src") + "&rand=" +
> > > > >> Math.random());
> > > > >> }
> > > > >>
> > > > >> or event better since random could give duplicate results:
> > > > >> protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
> > > > >> super.onComponentTag(tag);
> > > > >> tag.put("src", tag.getString("src") + "&autoIndex=" +
> > > > >> getPage().getAutoIndex());
> > > > >> }
> > > > >> Although im not sure if its safe to use autoIndex?I've put up a feature
> > > > >> request for it to be implemented.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-939
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> -Nino
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> this is whats generated:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > http://localhost:8080/thirdparty-webapp/thirdParty/?wicket:interface=:4:form:phoneA:phoneThumb:image::IResourceListener
> > > > ::
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> regards Nino
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> The most failsafe solution to the update image using Ajax request to
> > > > >>>> my mind is to add a random number to the url for the image (I thought
> > > > >>>> we already did that?).
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Martijn
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
> > > > >>>> <ni...@jayway.dk> wrote:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>> Hi
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> How do I add keywords no-cache and etc, for a panel? Reason are that
> > > > >>>>> the
> > > > >>>>> panel carries a image and that gets cached so when my ajax call
> > > > >>>>> comes in
> > > > >>>>> and updates the model then the old image are shown..
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> regards Nino
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
> Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta3 is released
> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta3/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: {wicket 1.3 beta 3} Howto add keywords No cache etc?
Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
Yes, but all those images will have a different url, or are they the
same? The milliseconds parameter is only used to distinguish between
requests, not within one.
Martijn
On 9/7/07, Matej Knopp <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Really? What's so odd about it? Say you have a page with 100 images.
> How long do you think such page renders? It shouldn't take long than
> say 5 ms on a decent machine.
>
> -Matej
>
> On 9/7/07, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 2 tags generating the same milisecond for the same client/session?
> > that looks very very very odd to me.
> >
> > johan
> >
> >
> > On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <ni...@jayway.dk>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Actually we discussed that.
> > >
> > > I suggested it but as Matej wrote:
> > > don't think so. you can have two tags generated in same millisecond.. As
> > > for nano might be better, lesser chance for tags being generated in the
> > > same nanosec. But whats wrong with autoindex?
> > >
> > > Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> > > > Why not use System.currentTimeMillis()? Or if you are really concerned
> > > > use nanotime.
> > > >
> > > > Martijn
> > > >
> > > > On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <ni...@jayway.dk>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> so no, talking to Matej on ##wicket, the fix was this:
> > > >>
> > > >> Resolutions are these two :
> > > >> protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
> > > >> super.onComponentTag(tag);
> > > >> tag.put("src", tag.getString("src") + "&rand=" +
> > > >> Math.random());
> > > >> }
> > > >>
> > > >> or event better since random could give duplicate results:
> > > >> protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
> > > >> super.onComponentTag(tag);
> > > >> tag.put("src", tag.getString("src") + "&autoIndex=" +
> > > >> getPage().getAutoIndex());
> > > >> }
> > > >> Although im not sure if its safe to use autoIndex?I've put up a feature
> > > >> request for it to be implemented.
> > > >>
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-939
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> -Nino
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> this is whats generated:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > http://localhost:8080/thirdparty-webapp/thirdParty/?wicket:interface=:4:form:phoneA:phoneThumb:image::IResourceListener
> > > ::
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> regards Nino
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> The most failsafe solution to the update image using Ajax request to
> > > >>>> my mind is to add a random number to the url for the image (I thought
> > > >>>> we already did that?).
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Martijn
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
> > > >>>> <ni...@jayway.dk> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> Hi
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> How do I add keywords no-cache and etc, for a panel? Reason are that
> > > >>>>> the
> > > >>>>> panel carries a image and that gets cached so when my ajax call
> > > >>>>> comes in
> > > >>>>> and updates the model then the old image are shown..
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> regards Nino
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
--
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta3 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta3/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: {wicket 1.3 beta 3} Howto add keywords No cache etc?
Posted by Matej Knopp <ma...@gmail.com>.
Really? What's so odd about it? Say you have a page with 100 images.
How long do you think such page renders? It shouldn't take long than
say 5 ms on a decent machine.
-Matej
On 9/7/07, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2 tags generating the same milisecond for the same client/session?
> that looks very very very odd to me.
>
> johan
>
>
> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <ni...@jayway.dk>
> wrote:
> >
> > Actually we discussed that.
> >
> > I suggested it but as Matej wrote:
> > don't think so. you can have two tags generated in same millisecond.. As
> > for nano might be better, lesser chance for tags being generated in the
> > same nanosec. But whats wrong with autoindex?
> >
> > Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> > > Why not use System.currentTimeMillis()? Or if you are really concerned
> > > use nanotime.
> > >
> > > Martijn
> > >
> > > On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <ni...@jayway.dk>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> so no, talking to Matej on ##wicket, the fix was this:
> > >>
> > >> Resolutions are these two :
> > >> protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
> > >> super.onComponentTag(tag);
> > >> tag.put("src", tag.getString("src") + "&rand=" +
> > >> Math.random());
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> or event better since random could give duplicate results:
> > >> protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
> > >> super.onComponentTag(tag);
> > >> tag.put("src", tag.getString("src") + "&autoIndex=" +
> > >> getPage().getAutoIndex());
> > >> }
> > >> Although im not sure if its safe to use autoIndex?I've put up a feature
> > >> request for it to be implemented.
> > >>
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-939
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -Nino
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> this is whats generated:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > http://localhost:8080/thirdparty-webapp/thirdParty/?wicket:interface=:4:form:phoneA:phoneThumb:image::IResourceListener
> > ::
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> regards Nino
> > >>>
> > >>> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> The most failsafe solution to the update image using Ajax request to
> > >>>> my mind is to add a random number to the url for the image (I thought
> > >>>> we already did that?).
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Martijn
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
> > >>>> <ni...@jayway.dk> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Hi
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> How do I add keywords no-cache and etc, for a panel? Reason are that
> > >>>>> the
> > >>>>> panel carries a image and that gets cached so when my ajax call
> > >>>>> comes in
> > >>>>> and updates the model then the old image are shown..
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> regards Nino
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: {wicket 1.3 beta 3} Howto add keywords No cache etc?
Posted by Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com>.
2 tags generating the same milisecond for the same client/session?
that looks very very very odd to me.
johan
On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <ni...@jayway.dk>
wrote:
>
> Actually we discussed that.
>
> I suggested it but as Matej wrote:
> don't think so. you can have two tags generated in same millisecond.. As
> for nano might be better, lesser chance for tags being generated in the
> same nanosec. But whats wrong with autoindex?
>
> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> > Why not use System.currentTimeMillis()? Or if you are really concerned
> > use nanotime.
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> > On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <ni...@jayway.dk>
> wrote:
> >
> >> so no, talking to Matej on ##wicket, the fix was this:
> >>
> >> Resolutions are these two :
> >> protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
> >> super.onComponentTag(tag);
> >> tag.put("src", tag.getString("src") + "&rand=" +
> >> Math.random());
> >> }
> >>
> >> or event better since random could give duplicate results:
> >> protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
> >> super.onComponentTag(tag);
> >> tag.put("src", tag.getString("src") + "&autoIndex=" +
> >> getPage().getAutoIndex());
> >> }
> >> Although im not sure if its safe to use autoIndex?I've put up a feature
> >> request for it to be implemented.
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-939
> >>
> >>
> >> -Nino
> >>
> >>
> >> Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
> >>
> >>> this is whats generated:
> >>>
> >>>
> http://localhost:8080/thirdparty-webapp/thirdParty/?wicket:interface=:4:form:phoneA:phoneThumb:image::IResourceListener
> ::
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> regards Nino
> >>>
> >>> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> The most failsafe solution to the update image using Ajax request to
> >>>> my mind is to add a random number to the url for the image (I thought
> >>>> we already did that?).
> >>>>
> >>>> Martijn
> >>>>
> >>>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
> >>>> <ni...@jayway.dk> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi
> >>>>>
> >>>>> How do I add keywords no-cache and etc, for a panel? Reason are that
> >>>>> the
> >>>>> panel carries a image and that gets cached so when my ajax call
> >>>>> comes in
> >>>>> and updates the model then the old image are shown..
> >>>>>
> >>>>> regards Nino
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
Re: {wicket 1.3 beta 3} Howto add keywords No cache etc?
Posted by Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <ni...@jayway.dk>.
This was how it was supposed to have written like:
Actually we discussed that.
I suggested it but as Matej wrote:
"don't think so. you can have two tags generated in same millisecond."
As for nano might be better, lesser chance for tags being generated in
the same nanosec.
But whats wrong with autoindex?
-Nino
Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
> Actually we discussed that.
>
> I suggested it but as Matej wrote:
> don't think so. you can have two tags generated in same millisecond..
> As for nano might be better, lesser chance for tags being generated in
> the same nanosec. But whats wrong with autoindex?
>
> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>> Why not use System.currentTimeMillis()? Or if you are really concerned
>> use nanotime.
>>
>> Martijn
>>
>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
>> <ni...@jayway.dk> wrote:
>>
>>> so no, talking to Matej on ##wicket, the fix was this:
>>>
>>> Resolutions are these two :
>>> protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
>>> super.onComponentTag(tag);
>>> tag.put("src", tag.getString("src") + "&rand=" +
>>> Math.random());
>>> }
>>>
>>> or event better since random could give duplicate results:
>>> protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
>>> super.onComponentTag(tag);
>>> tag.put("src", tag.getString("src") + "&autoIndex=" +
>>> getPage().getAutoIndex());
>>> }
>>> Although im not sure if its safe to use autoIndex?I've put up a feature
>>> request for it to be implemented.
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-939
>>>
>>>
>>> -Nino
>>>
>>>
>>> Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
>>>
>>>> this is whats generated:
>>>>
>>>> http://localhost:8080/thirdparty-webapp/thirdParty/?wicket:interface=:4:form:phoneA:phoneThumb:image::IResourceListener::
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> regards Nino
>>>>
>>>> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The most failsafe solution to the update image using Ajax request to
>>>>> my mind is to add a random number to the url for the image (I thought
>>>>> we already did that?).
>>>>>
>>>>> Martijn
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
>>>>> <ni...@jayway.dk> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How do I add keywords no-cache and etc, for a panel? Reason are that
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> panel carries a image and that gets cached so when my ajax call
>>>>>> comes in
>>>>>> and updates the model then the old image are shown..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> regards Nino
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: {wicket 1.3 beta 3} Howto add keywords No cache etc?
Posted by Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <ni...@jayway.dk>.
Actually we discussed that.
I suggested it but as Matej wrote:
don't think so. you can have two tags generated in same millisecond.. As
for nano might be better, lesser chance for tags being generated in the
same nanosec. But whats wrong with autoindex?
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> Why not use System.currentTimeMillis()? Or if you are really concerned
> use nanotime.
>
> Martijn
>
> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <ni...@jayway.dk> wrote:
>
>> so no, talking to Matej on ##wicket, the fix was this:
>>
>> Resolutions are these two :
>> protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
>> super.onComponentTag(tag);
>> tag.put("src", tag.getString("src") + "&rand=" +
>> Math.random());
>> }
>>
>> or event better since random could give duplicate results:
>> protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
>> super.onComponentTag(tag);
>> tag.put("src", tag.getString("src") + "&autoIndex=" +
>> getPage().getAutoIndex());
>> }
>> Although im not sure if its safe to use autoIndex?I've put up a feature
>> request for it to be implemented.
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-939
>>
>>
>> -Nino
>>
>>
>> Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
>>
>>> this is whats generated:
>>>
>>> http://localhost:8080/thirdparty-webapp/thirdParty/?wicket:interface=:4:form:phoneA:phoneThumb:image::IResourceListener::
>>>
>>>
>>> regards Nino
>>>
>>> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>>
>>>> The most failsafe solution to the update image using Ajax request to
>>>> my mind is to add a random number to the url for the image (I thought
>>>> we already did that?).
>>>>
>>>> Martijn
>>>>
>>>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
>>>> <ni...@jayway.dk> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> How do I add keywords no-cache and etc, for a panel? Reason are that
>>>>> the
>>>>> panel carries a image and that gets cached so when my ajax call
>>>>> comes in
>>>>> and updates the model then the old image are shown..
>>>>>
>>>>> regards Nino
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: {wicket 1.3 beta 3} Howto add keywords No cache etc?
Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
Why not use System.currentTimeMillis()? Or if you are really concerned
use nanotime.
Martijn
On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <ni...@jayway.dk> wrote:
> so no, talking to Matej on ##wicket, the fix was this:
>
> Resolutions are these two :
> protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
> super.onComponentTag(tag);
> tag.put("src", tag.getString("src") + "&rand=" +
> Math.random());
> }
>
> or event better since random could give duplicate results:
> protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
> super.onComponentTag(tag);
> tag.put("src", tag.getString("src") + "&autoIndex=" +
> getPage().getAutoIndex());
> }
> Although im not sure if its safe to use autoIndex?I've put up a feature
> request for it to be implemented.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-939
>
>
> -Nino
>
>
> Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
> > this is whats generated:
> >
> > http://localhost:8080/thirdparty-webapp/thirdParty/?wicket:interface=:4:form:phoneA:phoneThumb:image::IResourceListener::
> >
> >
> > regards Nino
> >
> > Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> >> The most failsafe solution to the update image using Ajax request to
> >> my mind is to add a random number to the url for the image (I thought
> >> we already did that?).
> >>
> >> Martijn
> >>
> >> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
> >> <ni...@jayway.dk> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi
> >>>
> >>> How do I add keywords no-cache and etc, for a panel? Reason are that
> >>> the
> >>> panel carries a image and that gets cached so when my ajax call
> >>> comes in
> >>> and updates the model then the old image are shown..
> >>>
> >>> regards Nino
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
--
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta3 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta3/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: {wicket 1.3 beta 3} Howto add keywords No cache etc?
Posted by Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <ni...@jayway.dk>.
so no, talking to Matej on ##wicket, the fix was this:
Resolutions are these two :
protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
super.onComponentTag(tag);
tag.put("src", tag.getString("src") + "&rand=" +
Math.random());
}
or event better since random could give duplicate results:
protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
super.onComponentTag(tag);
tag.put("src", tag.getString("src") + "&autoIndex=" +
getPage().getAutoIndex());
}
Although im not sure if its safe to use autoIndex?I've put up a feature
request for it to be implemented.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-939
-Nino
Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
> this is whats generated:
>
> http://localhost:8080/thirdparty-webapp/thirdParty/?wicket:interface=:4:form:phoneA:phoneThumb:image::IResourceListener::
>
>
> regards Nino
>
> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>> The most failsafe solution to the update image using Ajax request to
>> my mind is to add a random number to the url for the image (I thought
>> we already did that?).
>>
>> Martijn
>>
>> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
>> <ni...@jayway.dk> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> How do I add keywords no-cache and etc, for a panel? Reason are that
>>> the
>>> panel carries a image and that gets cached so when my ajax call
>>> comes in
>>> and updates the model then the old image are shown..
>>>
>>> regards Nino
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: {wicket 1.3 beta 3} Howto add keywords No cache etc?
Posted by Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <ni...@jayway.dk>.
this is whats generated:
http://localhost:8080/thirdparty-webapp/thirdParty/?wicket:interface=:4:form:phoneA:phoneThumb:image::IResourceListener::
regards Nino
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> The most failsafe solution to the update image using Ajax request to
> my mind is to add a random number to the url for the image (I thought
> we already did that?).
>
> Martijn
>
> On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <ni...@jayway.dk> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> How do I add keywords no-cache and etc, for a panel? Reason are that the
>> panel carries a image and that gets cached so when my ajax call comes in
>> and updates the model then the old image are shown..
>>
>> regards Nino
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org