You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@turbine.apache.org by Jason van Zyl <jv...@zenplex.com> on 2002/01/24 16:27:04 UTC
RunData & Security Changes
Hi,
I have made a branch called "rundata_security_changes" where I am going to
start the RunData changes. Gonzalo and Dan, this is where we will work until
the default security implementation works with our new plan.
When this is finished I will merge all our changes back into the trunk. Once
I'm finished the RunData changes the test bed will still work but
applications using t3 and the current security mechanism will be broken.
So I'll make the RunData changes and then you two (Gonzalo and Dan) can take
a bit of time to work out exactly what you think is best.
Once I'm done the RunData changes I'm going to move on to cleaning up the
view system.
I was chatting with Jeff yesterday and I think the next thing to tackle on a
first pass is development methodology. The CVS model of the TDK works pretty
much like Scarab but I would like to clean up the torque stuff, add some
cactus testing for the client side and introduce some continuous integration
techniques using Maven.
Right off the top of my head I can see a couple simplifications in the TDK:
1) The only mode for generating an app will be CVS mode which looks very
close to what scarab does.
2) Will allow the TDK to work with an already installed version of a servlet
container
3) Add the auto jar updater functionality to deal with non-jar resources so
the TDK can become versionless and a simple task will update the TDK when
new resources are available.
That's it for now.
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
http://tambora.zenplex.org
http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Cactus (Was:Re: RunData & Security Changes)
Posted by Jason van Zyl <jv...@zenplex.com>.
On 1/24/02 10:58 AM, "Colm McCartan" <co...@owl.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> I was chatting with Jeff yesterday and I think the next thing to tackle on a
>> first pass is development methodology. The CVS model of the TDK works pretty
>> much like Scarab but I would like to clean up the torque stuff, add some
>> cactus testing for the client side and introduce some continuous integration
>> techniques using Maven.
>
>
> As a matter of interest, are there any examples of integrated Cactus
> tests in CVS at the moment? I'm interested in building some test suites
> for tdk (2.1) apps.
Only in the jakarta-turbine-3 repository. What's there is more like
application testing as we just want to make sure that nothing is broken.
Eventually the tests in t3 will be to make sure that turbine is functioning
correctly under different servlet containers but what's where now would work
for you application testing.
>
> cheers,
> colm
> ................................................................
> colm mccartan
> panasonic owl uk
> colmm@owl.co.uk
> (44) 131 561 1035
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
http://tambora.zenplex.org
http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Cactus (Was:Re: RunData & Security Changes)
Posted by Colm McCartan <co...@owl.co.uk>.
> I was chatting with Jeff yesterday and I think the next thing to tackle on a
> first pass is development methodology. The CVS model of the TDK works pretty
> much like Scarab but I would like to clean up the torque stuff, add some
> cactus testing for the client side and introduce some continuous integration
> techniques using Maven.
As a matter of interest, are there any examples of integrated Cactus
tests in CVS at the moment? I'm interested in building some test suites
for tdk (2.1) apps.
cheers,
colm
................................................................
colm mccartan
panasonic owl uk
colmm@owl.co.uk
(44) 131 561 1035
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: RunData & Security Changes
Posted by Jason van Zyl <jv...@zenplex.com>.
On 1/24/02 10:48 AM, "Gonzalo A. Diethelm" <go...@aditiva.com>
wrote:
>> I have made a branch called "rundata_security_changes" where I am going to
>> start the RunData changes. Gonzalo and Dan, this is where we will
>> work until
>> the default security implementation works with our new plan.
>
> Got it, compiled it, ready to start working on it...
>
> By the way, update-jars is SO WONDERFUL!
>
>> So I'll make the RunData changes and then you two (Gonzalo and
>> Dan) can take a bit of time to work out exactly what you think is best.
>
> Ok. Are we still waiting on your writeup regarding the security
> model, or should we start on our own?
I'll post a little blurb about where I think you should hook into the
pipeline. I also think the interfaces should be empty at first and that we
should have several different implementations before we try to determine
anything that's common: possibly a simple properties file, rbac, default
turbine implementation. If you come to IRC we can probably hash out the
detail. I'm still not feeling 100% and I have to go to NYC in a couple of
days so I'm trying to take it easy.
>
>> I was chatting with Jeff yesterday and I think the next thing to
>> tackle on a
>> first pass is development methodology. The CVS model of the TDK
>> works pretty
>> much like Scarab but I would like to clean up the torque stuff, add some
>> cactus testing for the client side and introduce some continuous
>> integration
>> techniques using Maven.
>
> I think automated, unsupervised unit tests are a very good approach.
>
>> 2) Will allow the TDK to work with an already installed version
>> of a servlet container
>
>> From all the postings on the list, it seems this would be good.
>
>> Jason van Zyl
>
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
http://tambora.zenplex.org
http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
RE: RunData & Security Changes
Posted by "Gonzalo A. Diethelm" <go...@aditiva.com>.
> I have made a branch called "rundata_security_changes" where I am going to
> start the RunData changes. Gonzalo and Dan, this is where we will
> work until
> the default security implementation works with our new plan.
Got it, compiled it, ready to start working on it...
By the way, update-jars is SO WONDERFUL!
> So I'll make the RunData changes and then you two (Gonzalo and
> Dan) can take a bit of time to work out exactly what you think is best.
Ok. Are we still waiting on your writeup regarding the security
model, or should we start on our own?
> I was chatting with Jeff yesterday and I think the next thing to
> tackle on a
> first pass is development methodology. The CVS model of the TDK
> works pretty
> much like Scarab but I would like to clean up the torque stuff, add some
> cactus testing for the client side and introduce some continuous
> integration
> techniques using Maven.
I think automated, unsupervised unit tests are a very good approach.
> 2) Will allow the TDK to work with an already installed version
> of a servlet container
>>From all the postings on the list, it seems this would be good.
> Jason van Zyl
--
Gonzalo A. Diethelm
gonzalo.diethelm@aditiva.com
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>