You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@iota.apache.org by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com> on 2018/01/04 08:30:04 UTC
Re: [VOTE] Moving iota to 'attic' status
Hi,
I believe you need a vote on the IPMC general list to do that right?
While there does seem some interest from some people outside the project I don't see any pull requests or on list discussion on what to do and I have some doubts if there enough of a PPMC to continue oversight of the project.
Lets give it a few days and see if anyone else says anything and if not then hold a vote there.
Thanks,
Justin
Re: [VOTE] Moving iota to 'attic' status
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
I suspect we can consider this a positive vote, as a result does it make sense to move on to the general@incubator vote?
On 2018/01/04 17:49:43, Gunnar Tapper <ta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 9:19 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I think there is, or could be enough PPMC to provide oversight, but that's
> > not the point. I understand your perception, but that (true or not) is a
> > consequence of lack of activity on the project. One cannot have more active
> > oversight than active contributors.
> >
> > Unfortunately contributions were limited to mostly 2 people and even those
> > were in bursts. A release of something useful to a larger audience was
> > constantly delayed. We all agree that the execution did not follow the
> > vision and the interest expressed is not backed up by contributions.
> >
> > I do not see any reason to delay the move to attic, even by a few days.
> >
> > Hadrian
> >
> > On 01/04/2018 03:30 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I believe you need a vote on the IPMC general list to do that right?
> >>
> >> While there does seem some interest from some people outside the project
> >> I don't see any pull requests or on list discussion on what to do and I
> >> have some doubts if there enough of a PPMC to continue oversight of the
> >> project.
> >>
> >> Lets give it a few days and see if anyone else says anything and if not
> >> then hold a vote there.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Justin
> >>
> >>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> Gunnar
> *If you think you can you can, if you think you can't you're right.*
>
Re: [VOTE] Moving iota to 'attic' status
Posted by Gunnar Tapper <ta...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 9:19 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think there is, or could be enough PPMC to provide oversight, but that's
> not the point. I understand your perception, but that (true or not) is a
> consequence of lack of activity on the project. One cannot have more active
> oversight than active contributors.
>
> Unfortunately contributions were limited to mostly 2 people and even those
> were in bursts. A release of something useful to a larger audience was
> constantly delayed. We all agree that the execution did not follow the
> vision and the interest expressed is not backed up by contributions.
>
> I do not see any reason to delay the move to attic, even by a few days.
>
> Hadrian
>
> On 01/04/2018 03:30 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I believe you need a vote on the IPMC general list to do that right?
>>
>> While there does seem some interest from some people outside the project
>> I don't see any pull requests or on list discussion on what to do and I
>> have some doubts if there enough of a PPMC to continue oversight of the
>> project.
>>
>> Lets give it a few days and see if anyone else says anything and if not
>> then hold a vote there.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Justin
>>
>>
--
Thanks,
Gunnar
*If you think you can you can, if you think you can't you're right.*
Re: [VOTE] Moving iota to 'attic' status
Posted by Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>.
I think there is, or could be enough PPMC to provide oversight, but
that's not the point. I understand your perception, but that (true or
not) is a consequence of lack of activity on the project. One cannot
have more active oversight than active contributors.
Unfortunately contributions were limited to mostly 2 people and even
those were in bursts. A release of something useful to a larger audience
was constantly delayed. We all agree that the execution did not follow
the vision and the interest expressed is not backed up by contributions.
I do not see any reason to delay the move to attic, even by a few days.
Hadrian
On 01/04/2018 03:30 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I believe you need a vote on the IPMC general list to do that right?
>
> While there does seem some interest from some people outside the project I don't see any pull requests or on list discussion on what to do and I have some doubts if there enough of a PPMC to continue oversight of the project.
>
> Lets give it a few days and see if anyone else says anything and if not then hold a vote there.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>