You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@bloodhound.apache.org by Tetsuya Morimoto <te...@gmail.com> on 2014/07/13 07:59:09 UTC
About the project status
Hi,
I'm considering to use Apache Bloodhound for multiple project
migrating Trac. However, I couldn't get the picture from
http://bloodhound.apache.org/ . Sometimes, old document in incubator
period makes me confuse.
I know the version 0.7 was released on 2013-08-23 and and it seems
the development is not active recently.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/bloodhound-commits/
Though I'm using Trac 1.0.2-trunk, I want to migrate to stable
version. Can you show me the Apache Bloodhound's road map for the
future?
thanks,
Tetsuya
Re: About the project status
Posted by Tetsuya Morimoto <te...@gmail.com>.
Thank you for explaining current status which you're considering.
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Ryan J Ollos <rj...@apache.org> wrote:
> Bloodhound has Multiple-Project, Single-Environment support. Trac will
> hopefully provide support for multiple projects in a single environment in
> the future, but it isn't actively being worked on, and we haven't discussed
> whether some or all of what has been introduced in Bloodhound would be
> backported.
I'm not sure which is better architecture, but I agree with
Bloodhound's approach if it do work well.
> I have tried backporting some small changes from Bloodhound to Trac, and
> hope to soon embark on backporting some bigger features in 1.1.x:
> http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/11627
> http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/31#comment:180
>
> Olemis has backported some features, but the Trac devs still need to review
> and discuss the changes:
> http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/11585
> http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/11588
I was surprised that some features from Bloodhound are trying to
backport. That's good future for both, I think.
> I understand and I think the projects should be more closely integrated. At
> least, that is an aim of mine. I would like to see BloodhoundSearchApi,
> BloodhoundRelations and MultiProject support backported to Trac. Among
> other things, doing so will make maintaining Bloodhound easier and
> Bloodhound can then focus on providing features that go beyond Trac's aim
> of providing a "minimalistic approach to web-based software project
> management."
>
> I believe that Bloodhound will always be based on Trac (it will not
> permanently fork from the codebase), and we will aim to integrate changes
> from the latest releases as soon as they are available. Trac 1.0.2 should
> be available soon, based on the recent discussions on the TracDev mailing
> list.
I see. I know there're differences for the initial motivation/concept
between Trac and Apache Bloodhound. Then, I think Trac's "minimalistic
approach" should be changed to work with a modern situation in the
future. Anyway, I'm looking forward to updating Trac 1.0.2 and best of
luck to you.
thanks,
Tetsuya
Re: About the project status
Posted by Ryan J Ollos <rj...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Tetsuya Morimoto <
tetsuya.morimoto@gmail.com> wrote:
> And, I have a question between Trac and Apache Bloodhound.
>
> For example, multiple project support is now implementing on Trac-1.1,
> then will be provided on Trac-1.2. Apache bloodhound has that, both
> multiple project feature will be compatible in the future?
The Multi-Project support in Trac 1.1.x is the same as what existed in
prior versions of Trac. It is the Multiple-Project, Multiple-Environment
strategy.
Bloodhound has Multiple-Project, Single-Environment support. Trac will
hopefully provide support for multiple projects in a single environment in
the future, but it isn't actively being worked on, and we haven't discussed
whether some or all of what has been introduced in Bloodhound would be
backported.
I have tried backporting some small changes from Bloodhound to Trac, and
hope to soon embark on backporting some bigger features in 1.1.x:
http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/11627
http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/31#comment:180
Olemis has backported some features, but the Trac devs still need to review
and discuss the changes:
http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/11585
http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/11588
> I am a
> little confused that Trac and Apache bloodhound go together or not
> since some feature including in Apache bloodhound should be integrated
> in Trac.
I understand and I think the projects should be more closely integrated. At
least, that is an aim of mine. I would like to see BloodhoundSearchApi,
BloodhoundRelations and MultiProject support backported to Trac. Among
other things, doing so will make maintaining Bloodhound easier and
Bloodhound can then focus on providing features that go beyond Trac's aim
of providing a "minimalistic approach to web-based software project
management."
I believe that Bloodhound will always be based on Trac (it will not
permanently fork from the codebase), and we will aim to integrate changes
from the latest releases as soon as they are available. Trac 1.0.2 should
be available soon, based on the recent discussions on the TracDev mailing
list.
Re: About the project status
Posted by Tetsuya Morimoto <te...@gmail.com>.
And, I have a question between Trac and Apache Bloodhound.
For example, multiple project support is now implementing on Trac-1.1,
then will be provided on Trac-1.2. Apache bloodhound has that, both
multiple project feature will be compatible in the future? I am a
little confused that Trac and Apache bloodhound go together or not
since some feature including in Apache bloodhound should be integrated
in Trac.
thanks,
Tetsuya
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Tetsuya Morimoto
<te...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you for roadmap information. You are hard worker on both projects. :)
>
>> There are currently 3 Google Summer of Code students working on various projects
> I found those projects. It looks fascinating enhancement.
>
> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/project/details/google/gsoc2014/dammina/5649050225344512
> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/project/details/google/gsoc2014/antonia_horincar/5764017909923840
> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/project/details/google/gsoc2014/thimal/5676830073815040
>
>> Release 8 - needs to be created.
>> Release 9 - integrate changes from Trac 1.0.2 release.
>
> I'm looking forward to being integrated on 1.0.2. I know
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Ryan J Ollos <rj...@apache.org> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Tetsuya Morimoto <
>> tetsuya.morimoto@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm considering to use Apache Bloodhound for multiple project
>>> migrating Trac. However, I couldn't get the picture from
>>> http://bloodhound.apache.org/ . Sometimes, old document in incubator
>>> period makes me confuse.
>>>
>>> I know the version 0.7 was released on 2013-08-23 and and it seems
>>> the development is not active recently.
>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/bloodhound-commits/
>>>
>>> Though I'm using Trac 1.0.2-trunk, I want to migrate to stable
>>> version. Can you show me the Apache Bloodhound's road map for the
>>> future?
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> Tetsuya
>>>
>>
>> Bloodhound is currently built on Trac 1.0.1.
>>
>> The near term roadmap is,
>>
>> Release 8 - needs to be created.
>> Release 9 - integrate changes from Trac 1.0.2 release.
>>
>> You are right, there isn't much activity lately. The project could benefit
>> from more contributors. We would welcome additional contributions. There
>> are currently 3 Google Summer of Code students working on various projects
>> that will hopefully become part of Bloodhound.
Re: About the project status
Posted by Tetsuya Morimoto <te...@gmail.com>.
Thank you for roadmap information. You are hard worker on both projects. :)
> There are currently 3 Google Summer of Code students working on various projects
I found those projects. It looks fascinating enhancement.
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/project/details/google/gsoc2014/dammina/5649050225344512
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/project/details/google/gsoc2014/antonia_horincar/5764017909923840
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/project/details/google/gsoc2014/thimal/5676830073815040
> Release 8 - needs to be created.
> Release 9 - integrate changes from Trac 1.0.2 release.
I'm looking forward to being integrated on 1.0.2. I know
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Ryan J Ollos <rj...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Tetsuya Morimoto <
> tetsuya.morimoto@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm considering to use Apache Bloodhound for multiple project
>> migrating Trac. However, I couldn't get the picture from
>> http://bloodhound.apache.org/ . Sometimes, old document in incubator
>> period makes me confuse.
>>
>> I know the version 0.7 was released on 2013-08-23 and and it seems
>> the development is not active recently.
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/bloodhound-commits/
>>
>> Though I'm using Trac 1.0.2-trunk, I want to migrate to stable
>> version. Can you show me the Apache Bloodhound's road map for the
>> future?
>>
>> thanks,
>> Tetsuya
>>
>
> Bloodhound is currently built on Trac 1.0.1.
>
> The near term roadmap is,
>
> Release 8 - needs to be created.
> Release 9 - integrate changes from Trac 1.0.2 release.
>
> You are right, there isn't much activity lately. The project could benefit
> from more contributors. We would welcome additional contributions. There
> are currently 3 Google Summer of Code students working on various projects
> that will hopefully become part of Bloodhound.
Re: About the project status
Posted by Ryan J Ollos <rj...@apache.org>.
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Tetsuya Morimoto <
tetsuya.morimoto@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm considering to use Apache Bloodhound for multiple project
> migrating Trac. However, I couldn't get the picture from
> http://bloodhound.apache.org/ . Sometimes, old document in incubator
> period makes me confuse.
>
> I know the version 0.7 was released on 2013-08-23 and and it seems
> the development is not active recently.
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/bloodhound-commits/
>
> Though I'm using Trac 1.0.2-trunk, I want to migrate to stable
> version. Can you show me the Apache Bloodhound's road map for the
> future?
>
> thanks,
> Tetsuya
>
Bloodhound is currently built on Trac 1.0.1.
The near term roadmap is,
Release 8 - needs to be created.
Release 9 - integrate changes from Trac 1.0.2 release.
You are right, there isn't much activity lately. The project could benefit
from more contributors. We would welcome additional contributions. There
are currently 3 Google Summer of Code students working on various projects
that will hopefully become part of Bloodhound.