You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to log4php-dev@logging.apache.org by Christian Grobmeier <gr...@gmail.com> on 2009/01/16 07:50:57 UTC
Current state of log4php
Hi there,
is there anybody working on log4php?
Best,
Christian
Re: Current state of log4php
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
Thanks... Since parse_ini_file returns an array, your
patch is better.
On Feb 7, 2009, at 10:39 AM, Rotem Erlich wrote:
> Littel patch that fix loading configuration file.
>
> Rotem.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>
> To: Log4PHP Dev <lo...@logging.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Current state of log4php
> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:46:23 -0500
>
> I'm open to champion any patches that come in...
>
> On Jan 20, 2009, at 3:02 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your answers.
> > I believe the code is good, but nothing seems to change. Having the
> > email of Marshall in mind, it looks like he felt to make a fork to
> get
> > his changes in and this means, there is space for improvement. To be
> > honest, log4php looks a bit dead at the moment. And this is a sad
> > thing - i am also trying to get my php project incubated and I hoped
> > that here is more community action.
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com>
> > wrote:
> >> There is not much activity at all. It doesn't mean that the
> >> code sucks, it just means that it does what it should
> >> do and there hasn't been any real push to add more...
> >>
> >> On Jan 16, 2009, at 1:50 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi there,
> >>>
> >>> is there anybody working on log4php?
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> Christian
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> <patch.txt>
Re: Current state of log4php
Posted by Rotem Erlich <ro...@rotium.com>.
Littel patch that fix loading configuration file.
Rotem.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>
To: Log4PHP Dev <lo...@logging.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Current state of log4php
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:46:23 -0500
I'm open to champion any patches that come in...
On Jan 20, 2009, at 3:02 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Thanks for your answers.
> I believe the code is good, but nothing seems to change. Having the
> email of Marshall in mind, it looks like he felt to make a fork to get
> his changes in and this means, there is space for improvement. To be
> honest, log4php looks a bit dead at the moment. And this is a sad
> thing - i am also trying to get my php project incubated and I hoped
> that here is more community action.
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com>
> wrote:
>> There is not much activity at all. It doesn't mean that the
>> code sucks, it just means that it does what it should
>> do and there hasn't been any real push to add more...
>>
>> On Jan 16, 2009, at 1:50 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> is there anybody working on log4php?
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Christian
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Current state of log4php
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
I'm open to champion any patches that come in...
On Jan 20, 2009, at 3:02 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Thanks for your answers.
> I believe the code is good, but nothing seems to change. Having the
> email of Marshall in mind, it looks like he felt to make a fork to get
> his changes in and this means, there is space for improvement. To be
> honest, log4php looks a bit dead at the moment. And this is a sad
> thing - i am also trying to get my php project incubated and I hoped
> that here is more community action.
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com>
> wrote:
>> There is not much activity at all. It doesn't mean that the
>> code sucks, it just means that it does what it should
>> do and there hasn't been any real push to add more...
>>
>> On Jan 16, 2009, at 1:50 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> is there anybody working on log4php?
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Christian
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Current state of log4php
Posted by Christian Grobmeier <gr...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for your answers.
I believe the code is good, but nothing seems to change. Having the
email of Marshall in mind, it looks like he felt to make a fork to get
his changes in and this means, there is space for improvement. To be
honest, log4php looks a bit dead at the moment. And this is a sad
thing - i am also trying to get my php project incubated and I hoped
that here is more community action.
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> There is not much activity at all. It doesn't mean that the
> code sucks, it just means that it does what it should
> do and there hasn't been any real push to add more...
>
> On Jan 16, 2009, at 1:50 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> is there anybody working on log4php?
>>
>> Best,
>> Christian
>>
>
>
Re: Current state of log4php
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
There is not much activity at all. It doesn't mean that the
code sucks, it just means that it does what it should
do and there hasn't been any real push to add more...
On Jan 16, 2009, at 1:50 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> is there anybody working on log4php?
>
> Best,
> Christian
>