You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hama.apache.org by "Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org> on 2013/03/07 02:33:12 UTC
Q, Integration Classic Hama with current bigtop trunk
Hi gurus,
Currently TRUNK is based on Hadoop 2.0, right? We (Hama team) are
think about addressing HDFS 2.0 compatibility issue first to support
'classic Hama cluster mode' on top of existing Hadoop 2.0 cluster,
before YARN integration. My question is - once compatibility issue has
been solved, can I start to integrate classic Hama with bigtop TRUNK?
Thanks.
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon
Re: Q, Integration Classic Hama with current bigtop trunk
Posted by "Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org>.
Thank you for letting us know about them.
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Bruno Mahé <bm...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 03/06/2013 05:33 PM, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
>>
>> Hi gurus,
>>
>> Currently TRUNK is based on Hadoop 2.0, right? We (Hama team) are
>> think about addressing HDFS 2.0 compatibility issue first to support
>> 'classic Hama cluster mode' on top of existing Hadoop 2.0 cluster,
>> before YARN integration. My question is - once compatibility issue has
>> been solved, can I start to integrate classic Hama with bigtop TRUNK?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>
> Hi Edward,
>
> Yes, Apache Bigtop trunk uses Apache Hadoop 2.0.2-alpha.
>
> Your plan is completely valid since Apache Hama would work with the version
> of Apache Hadoop in trunk.
> The question of having independent services versus yarn integration is
> entirely up to you (or rather Apache Hama community) and would not be a
> requirement for adoption by Apache Bigtop. We only require projects to work
> together, we do not require maximum integration.
>
> But that's a great news!
>
> Thanks,
> Bruno
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon
Re: Q, Integration Classic Hama with current bigtop trunk
Posted by "Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org>.
Thank you for letting us know about them.
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Bruno Mahé <bm...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 03/06/2013 05:33 PM, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
>>
>> Hi gurus,
>>
>> Currently TRUNK is based on Hadoop 2.0, right? We (Hama team) are
>> think about addressing HDFS 2.0 compatibility issue first to support
>> 'classic Hama cluster mode' on top of existing Hadoop 2.0 cluster,
>> before YARN integration. My question is - once compatibility issue has
>> been solved, can I start to integrate classic Hama with bigtop TRUNK?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>
> Hi Edward,
>
> Yes, Apache Bigtop trunk uses Apache Hadoop 2.0.2-alpha.
>
> Your plan is completely valid since Apache Hama would work with the version
> of Apache Hadoop in trunk.
> The question of having independent services versus yarn integration is
> entirely up to you (or rather Apache Hama community) and would not be a
> requirement for adoption by Apache Bigtop. We only require projects to work
> together, we do not require maximum integration.
>
> But that's a great news!
>
> Thanks,
> Bruno
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon
Re: Q, Integration Classic Hama with current bigtop trunk
Posted by Bruno Mahé <bm...@apache.org>.
On 03/06/2013 05:33 PM, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
> Hi gurus,
>
> Currently TRUNK is based on Hadoop 2.0, right? We (Hama team) are
> think about addressing HDFS 2.0 compatibility issue first to support
> 'classic Hama cluster mode' on top of existing Hadoop 2.0 cluster,
> before YARN integration. My question is - once compatibility issue has
> been solved, can I start to integrate classic Hama with bigtop TRUNK?
>
> Thanks.
>
Hi Edward,
Yes, Apache Bigtop trunk uses Apache Hadoop 2.0.2-alpha.
Your plan is completely valid since Apache Hama would work with the
version of Apache Hadoop in trunk.
The question of having independent services versus yarn integration is
entirely up to you (or rather Apache Hama community) and would not be a
requirement for adoption by Apache Bigtop. We only require projects to
work together, we do not require maximum integration.
But that's a great news!
Thanks,
Bruno
Re: Q, Integration Classic Hama with current bigtop trunk
Posted by Bruno Mahé <bm...@apache.org>.
On 03/06/2013 05:33 PM, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
> Hi gurus,
>
> Currently TRUNK is based on Hadoop 2.0, right? We (Hama team) are
> think about addressing HDFS 2.0 compatibility issue first to support
> 'classic Hama cluster mode' on top of existing Hadoop 2.0 cluster,
> before YARN integration. My question is - once compatibility issue has
> been solved, can I start to integrate classic Hama with bigtop TRUNK?
>
> Thanks.
>
Hi Edward,
Yes, Apache Bigtop trunk uses Apache Hadoop 2.0.2-alpha.
Your plan is completely valid since Apache Hama would work with the
version of Apache Hadoop in trunk.
The question of having independent services versus yarn integration is
entirely up to you (or rather Apache Hama community) and would not be a
requirement for adoption by Apache Bigtop. We only require projects to
work together, we do not require maximum integration.
But that's a great news!
Thanks,
Bruno