javax. * to jakarta. * package updates

[Nishant Raut <ni...@gmail.com>]

Hi Jonathan and Team,

I have raised PR for moving files from javax.* to jakarta.* package. Can
you please check and let me know if there are any changes required.

Thanks and Regards,
Nishant Raut
https://twitter.com/rautnishant

Re: javax. * to jakarta. * package updates

[Nishant Raut <ni...@gmail.com>]

Hi Jonathan,

No worries feel free to reject the PR, i understand its not in working
state so no issues or use for comparison work etc.

I like the idea to maintain separate examples.

I would be happy to help if you can guide me in right direction.


Thanks and Regards,
Nishant Raut
https://twitter.com/rautnishant

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020, 6:15 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'll run through some tests with it. There was a thread I kicked off about
> using a Transformation process, and we'd effectively get two sets of
> binaries (one javax, and one jakarta) from the same codebase. I don't have
> a strong view on whether the actual source uses javax or jakarta, but we do
> need to be able to support apps in both, and we'll need to support working
> under javax for a fair amount of time. To merge in the PR, we'd want to at
> least make sure that the build is green, and there are no regressions. I
> suspects its actually the dependencies that will make this difficult.
>
> So, to set expectations, this might not get merged, or it might not get
> merged right away. I definitely don't want you to take that negatively
> though. This PR is *seriously* useful, as it throws up a number of
> transformations that I don't think have been considered, so I'd definitely
> like to run tests against it and compare its output to what is getting
> transformed through the tools.
>
> For the examples PR, I'm wondering whether we can have a Jakarta examples,
> and a Javax examples - what do you think?
>
> In terms of the Jakarta EE work, I feel very much inclined to use the
> libraries from Geronimo, for the reasons Mark has suggested (licenses,
> OSGi). Some progress we can there would be excellent. That code is in SVN
> so you'd need to provide a patch on a JIRA ticket, or we can look to see if
> we can get that moved over to Git to get a PR.
>
> Jon
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:49 PM Nishant Raut <ni...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jonathan,
> >
> > I have seen similar PR in jakarta flat rename, so once we have updated
> > jakarta ee api it should work.
> >
> > Thanks and Regards,
> > Nishant Raut
> > https://twitter.com/rautnishant
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020, 4:58 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
> > jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for sending these over - I'll take a look. Does it run / work?
> > >
> > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 6:47 PM Nishant Raut <ni...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Raised for examples as well.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks and Regards,
> > > > Nishant Raut
> > > > https://twitter.com/rautnishant
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2020, 8:28 PM Nishant Raut <ni...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Jonathan and Team,
> > > > >
> > > > > I have raised PR for moving files from javax.* to jakarta.*
> package.
> > > Can
> > > > > you please check and let me know if there are any changes required.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks and Regards,
> > > > > Nishant Raut
> > > > > https://twitter.com/rautnishant
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: javax. * to jakarta. * package updates

[Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>]

I'll run through some tests with it. There was a thread I kicked off about
using a Transformation process, and we'd effectively get two sets of
binaries (one javax, and one jakarta) from the same codebase. I don't have
a strong view on whether the actual source uses javax or jakarta, but we do
need to be able to support apps in both, and we'll need to support working
under javax for a fair amount of time. To merge in the PR, we'd want to at
least make sure that the build is green, and there are no regressions. I
suspects its actually the dependencies that will make this difficult.

So, to set expectations, this might not get merged, or it might not get
merged right away. I definitely don't want you to take that negatively
though. This PR is *seriously* useful, as it throws up a number of
transformations that I don't think have been considered, so I'd definitely
like to run tests against it and compare its output to what is getting
transformed through the tools.

For the examples PR, I'm wondering whether we can have a Jakarta examples,
and a Javax examples - what do you think?

In terms of the Jakarta EE work, I feel very much inclined to use the
libraries from Geronimo, for the reasons Mark has suggested (licenses,
OSGi). Some progress we can there would be excellent. That code is in SVN
so you'd need to provide a patch on a JIRA ticket, or we can look to see if
we can get that moved over to Git to get a PR.

Jon

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:49 PM Nishant Raut <ni...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Jonathan,
>
> I have seen similar PR in jakarta flat rename, so once we have updated
> jakarta ee api it should work.
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Nishant Raut
> https://twitter.com/rautnishant
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020, 4:58 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
> jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for sending these over - I'll take a look. Does it run / work?
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 6:47 PM Nishant Raut <ni...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Raised for examples as well.
> > >
> > > Thanks and Regards,
> > > Nishant Raut
> > > https://twitter.com/rautnishant
> > >
> > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2020, 8:28 PM Nishant Raut <ni...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Jonathan and Team,
> > > >
> > > > I have raised PR for moving files from javax.* to jakarta.* package.
> > Can
> > > > you please check and let me know if there are any changes required.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks and Regards,
> > > > Nishant Raut
> > > > https://twitter.com/rautnishant
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: javax. * to jakarta. * package updates

[Nishant Raut <ni...@gmail.com>]

Hi Jonathan,

I have seen similar PR in jakarta flat rename, so once we have updated
jakarta ee api it should work.

Thanks and Regards,
Nishant Raut
https://twitter.com/rautnishant

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020, 4:58 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for sending these over - I'll take a look. Does it run / work?
>
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 6:47 PM Nishant Raut <ni...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Raised for examples as well.
> >
> > Thanks and Regards,
> > Nishant Raut
> > https://twitter.com/rautnishant
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 26, 2020, 8:28 PM Nishant Raut <ni...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Jonathan and Team,
> > >
> > > I have raised PR for moving files from javax.* to jakarta.* package.
> Can
> > > you please check and let me know if there are any changes required.
> > >
> > > Thanks and Regards,
> > > Nishant Raut
> > > https://twitter.com/rautnishant
> > >
> >
>

Re: javax. * to jakarta. * package updates

[Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>]

Thanks for sending these over - I'll take a look. Does it run / work?

On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 6:47 PM Nishant Raut <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Raised for examples as well.
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Nishant Raut
> https://twitter.com/rautnishant
>
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020, 8:28 PM Nishant Raut <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jonathan and Team,
> >
> > I have raised PR for moving files from javax.* to jakarta.* package. Can
> > you please check and let me know if there are any changes required.
> >
> > Thanks and Regards,
> > Nishant Raut
> > https://twitter.com/rautnishant
> >
>

Re: javax. * to jakarta. * package updates

[Nishant Raut <ni...@gmail.com>]

Raised for examples as well.

Thanks and Regards,
Nishant Raut
https://twitter.com/rautnishant

On Sun, Apr 26, 2020, 8:28 PM Nishant Raut <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Jonathan and Team,
>
> I have raised PR for moving files from javax.* to jakarta.* package. Can
> you please check and let me know if there are any changes required.
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Nishant Raut
> https://twitter.com/rautnishant
>