You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@apr.apache.org by "MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)" <ma...@hp.com> on 2002/02/08 18:53:54 UTC
RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS
How about the configure.in fix for HPUX 11i - would you be bumping the tag
for that file also ??.. If not, then something has to go into the README
file because .31 will not work as-is on a HPUX 11i system..
Thanks
-Madhu
-----Original Message-----
From: jerenkrantz@apache.org [mailto:jerenkrantz@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 9:15 AM
To: httpd-2.0-cvs@apache.org
Subject: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS
jerenkrantz 02/02/08 09:15:02
Modified: . STATUS
Log:
Explain why I'm sitting on .32.
Revision Changes Path
1.490 +10 -1 httpd-2.0/STATUS
Index: STATUS
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/STATUS,v
retrieving revision 1.489
retrieving revision 1.490
diff -u -r1.489 -r1.490
--- STATUS 7 Feb 2002 23:01:47 -0000 1.489
+++ STATUS 8 Feb 2002 17:15:01 -0000 1.490
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
APACHE 2.0 STATUS:
-*-text-*-
-Last modified at [$Date: 2002/02/07 23:01:47 $]
+Last modified at [$Date: 2002/02/08 17:15:01 $]
Release:
@@ -41,6 +41,15 @@
CURRENT RELEASE NOTES:
+
+ * 32 status:
+ Justin is waiting for Win32 to become functional. As potential
+ RM for .32, he considers it a showstopper. Once Win32 is
+ operational (per EitherBills), .32 will be rolled. If the group
+ thinks that we could have a good beta without Win32 support,
please
+ note so here. If a majority agree that Win32 is not required for
+ a beta, Justin will roll .32 ASAP. (And, if you agree with the
+ fact that Win32 is a showstopper, please note that here too.)
* Proposed BETA possibilities
31 + fixes for all resolved problems and call it 32 (instead of
HEAD)
Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS
Posted by Justin Erenkrantz <je...@ebuilt.com>.
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 12:53:54PM -0500, MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote:
> How about the configure.in fix for HPUX 11i - would you be bumping the tag
> for that file also ??.. If not, then something has to go into the README
> file because .31 will not work as-is on a HPUX 11i system..
I'm planning on making .32 be HEAD whenever Win32 is fixed, so this
fix will be in. If there is some oddball commit that I think
challenges the stability of the tree before then, I won't include
it. (That's why I'm maintaining my own tag for now.) -- justin