applet signing

[Alex O'Ree <sp...@gmail.com>]

Kurt

I think we still have an issue with the applet signing. It looks like
its signing before building the combined jar file, resulting in a
unsigned jar file. This breaks the digital signature applet. Could you
look at it when you have a chance?

Re: applet signing

[Alex O'Ree <sp...@gmail.com>]

Ahh, this needs to be added to the manifest before signing

Permissions: all-permissions


On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Alex O'Ree <sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> we also need to look into adding stuff to the manifest to prevent this
> error with java 7
>
> Note to the Publisher: Security features to prevent unauthorized
> redistribution of your Java application will cause this application to
> be blocked in the future. See current Java documentation about JAR
> Manifest entries for the changes that need to be made.
>
> Note to users: For any questions, please contact the Publisher who
> provided you with this application.
>
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Alex O'Ree <sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> combined = applet + dependencies
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Kurt Stam <ku...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Sure, what is the combined jar?
>>>
>>>> On Oct 15, 2013, at 21:52, "Alex O'Ree" <sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Kurt
>>>>
>>>> I think we still have an issue with the applet signing. It looks like
>>>> its signing before building the combined jar file, resulting in a
>>>> unsigned jar file. This breaks the digital signature applet. Could you
>>>> look at it when you have a chance?

Re: applet signing

[Alex O'Ree <sp...@gmail.com>]

we also need to look into adding stuff to the manifest to prevent this
error with java 7

Note to the Publisher: Security features to prevent unauthorized
redistribution of your Java application will cause this application to
be blocked in the future. See current Java documentation about JAR
Manifest entries for the changes that need to be made.

Note to users: For any questions, please contact the Publisher who
provided you with this application.

On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Alex O'Ree <sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> combined = applet + dependencies
>
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Kurt Stam <ku...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Sure, what is the combined jar?
>>
>>> On Oct 15, 2013, at 21:52, "Alex O'Ree" <sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Kurt
>>>
>>> I think we still have an issue with the applet signing. It looks like
>>> its signing before building the combined jar file, resulting in a
>>> unsigned jar file. This breaks the digital signature applet. Could you
>>> look at it when you have a chance?

Re: applet signing

[Alex O'Ree <sp...@gmail.com>]

combined = applet + dependencies

On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Kurt Stam <ku...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sure, what is the combined jar?
>
>> On Oct 15, 2013, at 21:52, "Alex O'Ree" <sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Kurt
>>
>> I think we still have an issue with the applet signing. It looks like
>> its signing before building the combined jar file, resulting in a
>> unsigned jar file. This breaks the digital signature applet. Could you
>> look at it when you have a chance?

Re: applet signing

[Kurt Stam <ku...@gmail.com>]

Sure, what is the combined jar?

> On Oct 15, 2013, at 21:52, "Alex O'Ree" <sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Kurt
> 
> I think we still have an issue with the applet signing. It looks like
> its signing before building the combined jar file, resulting in a
> unsigned jar file. This breaks the digital signature applet. Could you
> look at it when you have a chance?

Re: applet signing

[Alex O'Ree <sp...@gmail.com>]

update, the jar without dependencies is signed, with dependencies is unsigned

On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Alex O'Ree <sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kurt
>
> I think we still have an issue with the applet signing. It looks like
> its signing before building the combined jar file, resulting in a
> unsigned jar file. This breaks the digital signature applet. Could you
> look at it when you have a chance?