Re: Weekly: Geronimo 1.2-r480769

[Vamsavardhana Reddy <c1...@gmail.com>]

Joe,

We don't need the "old keystore" portlet any longer.  I have created a JIRA
GERONIMO-2601 for that.  I will work on the JIRA and it should be removed by
the next weekly build.

--vamsi

On 11/30/06, Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> I picked up the jetty j2ee image and ran some quick, simple tests.  So
> far everything looks good. I was able to deploy a web application, use
> various console functions including the DB pool wizard, and some others.
>
> I did notice that the old keystore portlet is still included in the web
> console.  Is there some reason that this needs to hang around still?
>
> Joe
>
>
>
> Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> > Geronimo 1.2-r480769 - Nov 29, 2006
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/unstable/1.2-r480769/
> >
> > geronimo-1.2-r480769-src.tar.gz
> > geronimo-1.2-r480769-src.zip
> > geronimo-framework-1.2-r480769.tar.gz
> > geronimo-framework-1.2-r480769.zip
> > geronimo-jetty-j2ee-1.2-r480769.tar.gz
> > geronimo-jetty-j2ee-1.2-r480769.zip
> > geronimo-jetty-minimal-1.2-r480769.tar.gz
> > geronimo-jetty-minimal-1.2-r480769.zip
> > geronimo-tomcat-j2ee-1.2-r480769.tar.gz
> > geronimo-tomcat-j2ee-1.2-r480769.zip
> > geronimo-tomcat-minimal-1.2-r480769.tar.gz
> > geronimo-tomcat-minimal-1.2-r480769.zip
> >
> > Changelog:
> >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/unstable/1.2-r480769/CHANGELOG.txt
> >
> >
> > NOTE: This build is not an official release, nor tested, and should be
> > considered unstable.
> >
> >
>