You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to notifications@couchdb.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2020/01/11 08:35:10 UTC

[GitHub] [couchdb] nickva commented on issue #2382: CouchDB backup instance - zones vs replicas?

nickva commented on issue #2382: CouchDB backup instance - zones vs replicas?
URL: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/2382#issuecomment-573295902
 
 
   @nicknaychov 
   
   Thank you for sharing your experience and the discussion.  Sounds like your setup might work as you described it above in https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/2382#issuecomment-569491393. Just make sure you keep the same node names if possible when/if you move your shards, it will make things easier and keep an eye on the network latency and connectivity.
   
   Regarding security on the WAN you could try a VP,  or use TLS (see https://www.erlang-solutions.com/blog/erlang-distribution-over-tls.html). TLS will usually work better with later versions of Erlang, if you go that route.
   
   Since there is discussion in #2386, which answers well your questions about placement and R/W optimization let's close this ticket.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services