You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to geospatial@apache.org by Martin Desruisseaux <ma...@geomatys.com> on 2023/10/19 04:26:00 UTC
"org.opengis" package name collision resolved
Hello all
The GeoTools project released GeoTools 30 [1], which contains a renaming
of their "org.opengis" packages to "org.geotools.api". Thanks to this
renaming, it should now be possible to have Apache SIS or PROJ-JNI
libraries to coexist with GeoTools in the same JVM. There is nothing to
change for Apache SIS or PROJ-JNI users, the conflict was a GeoTools
problem to be resolved on their side.
However the communication of GeoTools PMC about GeoAPI history is still
misleading, and sometime false. I added a "GeoTools 30 release" section
in the bottom of the GeoAPI history page at [2] for responding to 3
false claims. This page contains references to OGC and mailing list
archives for allowing readers to verify by themselves.
Martin
[1]https://geotoolsnews.blogspot.com/2023/10/geotools-300-released.html
[2]https://desruisseaux.github.io/history/GeoAPI.html
Re: "org.opengis" package name collision resolved
Posted by Jia Yu <ji...@apache.org>.
Thanks Martin for the synergy!
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 9:27 PM Martin Desruisseaux
<ma...@geomatys.com> wrote:
>
> Hello all
>
> The GeoTools project released GeoTools 30 [1], which contains a renaming
> of their "org.opengis" packages to "org.geotools.api". Thanks to this
> renaming, it should now be possible to have Apache SIS or PROJ-JNI
> libraries to coexist with GeoTools in the same JVM. There is nothing to
> change for Apache SIS or PROJ-JNI users, the conflict was a GeoTools
> problem to be resolved on their side.
>
> However the communication of GeoTools PMC about GeoAPI history is still
> misleading, and sometime false. I added a "GeoTools 30 release" section
> in the bottom of the GeoAPI history page at [2] for responding to 3
> false claims. This page contains references to OGC and mailing list
> archives for allowing readers to verify by themselves.
>
> Martin
>
> [1]https://geotoolsnews.blogspot.com/2023/10/geotools-300-released.html
> [2]https://desruisseaux.github.io/history/GeoAPI.html
Re: "org.opengis" package name collision resolved
Posted by Bertil Chapuis <bc...@gmail.com>.
This is great news for opengis!
Thank you for you hard work,
Bertil
> On 19 Oct 2023, at 06:26, Martin Desruisseaux <ma...@geomatys.com> wrote:
>
> Hello all
>
> The GeoTools project released GeoTools 30 [1], which contains a renaming of their "org.opengis" packages to "org.geotools.api". Thanks to this renaming, it should now be possible to have Apache SIS or PROJ-JNI libraries to coexist with GeoTools in the same JVM. There is nothing to change for Apache SIS or PROJ-JNI users, the conflict was a GeoTools problem to be resolved on their side.
>
> However the communication of GeoTools PMC about GeoAPI history is still misleading, and sometime false. I added a "GeoTools 30 release" section in the bottom of the GeoAPI history page at [2] for responding to 3 false claims. This page contains references to OGC and mailing list archives for allowing readers to verify by themselves.
>
> Martin
>
> [1]https://geotoolsnews.blogspot.com/2023/10/geotools-300-released.html
> [2]https://desruisseaux.github.io/history/GeoAPI.html
Re: "org.opengis" package name collision resolved
Posted by Jia Yu <ji...@apache.org>.
Thanks Martin for the synergy!
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 9:27 PM Martin Desruisseaux
<ma...@geomatys.com> wrote:
>
> Hello all
>
> The GeoTools project released GeoTools 30 [1], which contains a renaming
> of their "org.opengis" packages to "org.geotools.api". Thanks to this
> renaming, it should now be possible to have Apache SIS or PROJ-JNI
> libraries to coexist with GeoTools in the same JVM. There is nothing to
> change for Apache SIS or PROJ-JNI users, the conflict was a GeoTools
> problem to be resolved on their side.
>
> However the communication of GeoTools PMC about GeoAPI history is still
> misleading, and sometime false. I added a "GeoTools 30 release" section
> in the bottom of the GeoAPI history page at [2] for responding to 3
> false claims. This page contains references to OGC and mailing list
> archives for allowing readers to verify by themselves.
>
> Martin
>
> [1]https://geotoolsnews.blogspot.com/2023/10/geotools-300-released.html
> [2]https://desruisseaux.github.io/history/GeoAPI.html