You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@nifi.apache.org by "Kevin Doran (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/07/29 19:34:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (NIFIREG-292) Add database implementations of UserGroupProvider and AccessPolicyProvider

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFIREG-292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17167468#comment-17167468 ] 

Kevin Doran commented on NIFIREG-292:
-------------------------------------

[~ChrisEng] Ideally, perhaps, however, the different clustering model used by NiFi, where changes to the state are replicated across all nodes, mean that the existing File-based providers are sufficient in NiFi for HA, whereas the NiFi Registry clustering approach relies on an external, central store for all state (ie, the database)

> Add database implementations of UserGroupProvider and AccessPolicyProvider
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFIREG-292
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFIREG-292
>             Project: NiFi Registry
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Bryan Bende
>            Assignee: Bryan Bende
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 3h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> We should offer database backed implementations of UserGroupProvider and AccessPolicyProvider as an alternative to the file-based impls. We have LDAP and Ranger alternatives, but for people not using those, the DB impls would be a good way to get the data off the local filesystem.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)