You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@struts.apache.org by Vinny <xa...@gmail.com> on 2005/11/28 21:38:25 UTC
Ok, I'll bite. Struts + Webwork = Struts Ti?
I found this very interesting this morning:
http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=37794#192216
and this as well
http://www.javalobby.org/java/forums/t55018.html
I guess I should not be that suprised since Xwork was mentioned here:
https://www.twdata.org/projects/struts-ti
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Ok, I'll bite. Struts + Webwork = Struts Ti?
Posted by Ted Husted <te...@gmail.com>.
>From my viewpoint, the short story is this: If you look at the Struts
Roadmap, and you look at WebWork 2.x, you'll see that WebWork has
already done most of the things Struts wants to do. Why re-invent the
wheel? Essentially, this is a proposal to put WebWorks wheels on the
Struts axle.
-Ted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Ok, I'll bite. Struts + Webwork = Struts Ti?
Posted by Adam Hardy <ah...@cyberspaceroad.com>.
personally i don't think it matters what framework comes out of the
wash, as long as it is better.
by that i mean it should:
- offer the same level of modular functionality such as validator and tiles
- make application development quicker, ironing out the time-consuming
parts of present struts
- bringing such features as search list pagination, dropdown handling,
reference data caching and so on into the core struts /
whatever-its-name-is framework.
I'd love to play a part in getting there, and perhaps next year I'll
actually get to a point where I can start contributing to struts!
David G. Friedman on 28/11/05 21:59, wrote:
> That's why I'm probably going to a (Boston) New England Java Users group in January so I can get help with that:
>
> Struts 2006: An embarrassment of riches.
> Ted Husted
>
> Overview:
>
> Apache Struts is a hotbed of activity.
> Struts Classic 1.3, Struts Shale, Struts Ti, Struts OverDrive.
> Why so many frameworks? How are they different? Why are they all called Struts? Which is the best choice for my next
> project? In this session, we step back and look at Struts through a wide-angle lens.
>
> Ted presented "Struts: Past, Present, and Future, and Impact of JSF" to the NEJUG in October 2004, and it resulted in
> the largest audience we've had in the past 3 years. Now Ted gets us up to speed on what has happened with Struts since
> then. Note this will be an updated version of the presentation Ted will be giving in December 2005 at ApacheCon in San
> Diego.
>
> Regards,
> David
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vinny [mailto:xaymaca@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 3:38 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Ok, I'll bite. Struts + Webwork = Struts Ti?
>
>
> I found this very interesting this morning:
>
> http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=37794#192216
> and this as well
> http://www.javalobby.org/java/forums/t55018.html
>
> I guess I should not be that suprised since Xwork was mentioned here:
> https://www.twdata.org/projects/struts-ti
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
RE: Ok, I'll bite. Struts + Webwork = Struts Ti?
Posted by "David G. Friedman" <hu...@ix.netcom.com>.
That's why I'm probably going to a (Boston) New England Java Users group in January so I can get help with that:
Struts 2006: An embarrassment of riches.
Ted Husted
Overview:
Apache Struts is a hotbed of activity.
Struts Classic 1.3, Struts Shale, Struts Ti, Struts OverDrive.
Why so many frameworks? How are they different? Why are they all called Struts? Which is the best choice for my next
project? In this session, we step back and look at Struts through a wide-angle lens.
Ted presented "Struts: Past, Present, and Future, and Impact of JSF" to the NEJUG in October 2004, and it resulted in
the largest audience we've had in the past 3 years. Now Ted gets us up to speed on what has happened with Struts since
then. Note this will be an updated version of the presentation Ted will be giving in December 2005 at ApacheCon in San
Diego.
Regards,
David
-----Original Message-----
From: Vinny [mailto:xaymaca@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 3:38 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Ok, I'll bite. Struts + Webwork = Struts Ti?
I found this very interesting this morning:
http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=37794#192216
and this as well
http://www.javalobby.org/java/forums/t55018.html
I guess I should not be that suprised since Xwork was mentioned here:
https://www.twdata.org/projects/struts-ti
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org