You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@systemml.apache.org by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> on 2016/01/11 19:23:36 UTC
Starting a SystemML 0.9 release
I would like to volunteer as RM for the next SystemML release, which I
propose we call it 0.9.
I was planning to start the process later today, unless there is any
blocking issue that folks are working on and would like to get it in before
the release.
Let's use this thread to coordinate any issues needed for the release.
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> In my opinion, our release process takes too long but that's ok for the
> second release - we just need to improve upon it. Instead of waiting for
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11084,
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11084> I would suggest to
> create a branch for 0.9 and move on. This would also be useful for pure
> maintenance releases we want to do. So maybe we could make this a general
> policy. Any objections?
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
>
Most of the wait time on the release is either waiting for other jiras to
get fixed or for infra issues, as the release process is very quick.
Anyway, branch 0.9 created....
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-systemml.git
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release
Posted by Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>.
In my opinion, our release process takes too long but that's ok for the
second release - we just need to improve upon it. Instead of waiting for
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11084, I would suggest to
create a branch for 0.9 and move on. This would also be useful for pure
maintenance releases we want to do. So maybe we could make this a general
policy. Any objections?
Regards,
Matthias
From: Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 01/15/2016 01:52 PM
Subject: Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release
Regarding the documentation, if analytics_on in docs/_config.yml is set to
false when jekyll is run, then analytics is not added to the rendered HTML,
which would probably be a good idea for docs in a packaged release (if the
documentation site is packaged with the release).
Additionally, SYSTEMML_VERSION in docs/_config.yml sets the SystemML
version references in the rendered HTML, so it should be set to 0.9 when
docs are generated for a release.
Deron
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> If docs are included in the release distributions, it would be nice if
> they were the generated (mostly) HTML documentation in docs/_site after
> running jekyll. This would give users a complete set of documentation for
> the release. This includes the aforementioned Algorithms Reference pdf
and
> all of the documentation currently available online.
>
> Deron
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Luciano,
>>
>> WRT docs, it would be nice to have a snapshot of the generated
>> documentation site (like http://apache.github.io/incubator-systemml/).
>> This allows a historical display of documentation similar to Spark (
>> http://spark.apache.org/documentation.html). If that is available
>> online, is it necessary to package the Algorithms Reference PDF or
README
>> with the releases? Also, the docs/README.md describes generating the
>> documentation site from markdown using jekyll so I'm not sure if that
would
>> help anyone if the *.md files aren't included in the release
distributions.
>> Or is this a different README?
>>
>> Deron
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> great - thanks Niketan. From my perspective, we're also good to go.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>> [image: Inactive hide details for Niketan Pansare---01/15/2016 11:56:55
>>> AM---Hi all, As FYI, I ran some performance experiments this we]Niketan
>>> Pansare---01/15/2016 11:56:55 AM---Hi all, As FYI, I ran some
performance
>>> experiments this week and the release
>>>
>>> From: Niketan Pansare/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
>>> Date: 01/15/2016 11:56 AM
>>> Subject: Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> As FYI, I ran some performance experiments this week and the release
>>> SystemML 0.9 looks good to me :)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Niketan Pansare
>>> IBM Almaden Research Center
>>> E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com
>>>
*http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar*
>>> <http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar
>
>>>
>>> Mike Dusenberry ---01/14/2016 06:49:31 PM---The DML Language Reference
>>> would be great to have as well. Also, in general, I think we should
only
>>>
>>> From: Mike Dusenberry <du...@gmail.com>
>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
>>> Date: 01/14/2016 06:49 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The DML Language Reference would be great to have as well.
>>>
>>> Also, in general, I think we should only have the Javadocs for end-user
>>> facing code, such MLContext, rather than for any deep internals that a
>>> user
>>> is not going to interact with.
>>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 6:26 PM Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > What should be the minimum documentation to add to the release
>>> distribution
>>> > ?
>>> >
>>> > Currently we have :
>>> > docs/README.txt
>>> > docs/SysteML_Algorithms_Reference.pdf
>>> >
>>> > I was planning to add the javadocs as well.
>>> >
>>> > But I still think we have much more available in trunk that we could
>>> add...
>>> >
>>> > Suggestions are welcome...
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Luciano Resende <
>>> luckbr1975@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Also, for fixed jiras, I did the following query :
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
*https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-376?jql=project%20%3D%20SYSTEMML%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29%20AND%20created%20%3E%3D%202015-10-27*
>>> <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-376?jql=project%20%3D%20SYSTEMML%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29%20AND%20created%20%3E%3D%202015-10-27
>
>>> > >
>>> > > And was wondering if we could all move this to 0.9 release.
>>> > >
>>> > > Could someone please help me verify.
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Luciano Resende <
>>> luckbr1975@gmail.com>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Matthias Boehm
<mboehm@us.ibm.com
>>> >
>>> > >> wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >>> great - thanks everybody. Let's get these two fixes in and close
>>> the
>>> > >>> release. Until that point, please no new features. The version
>>> number
>>> > 0.9
>>> > >>> is fine with me since it's not really a pure maintenance release
as
>>> > many
>>> > >>> new features went in too. Down the road, however, we need to
think
>>> > about
>>> > >>> release branches.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >> We can create release branches now, or from the tag when we need a
>>> 0.9.1
>>> > >> for example. As we are not a large project with tens of prs coming
>>> very
>>> > >> quick, I would recommend to create the branch as needed for minor
>>> > releases.
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> --
>>> > >> Luciano Resende
>>> > >> *http://people.apache.org/~lresende*
>>> <http://people.apache.org/~lresende>
>>> > >> *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975
>
>>> > >> *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
>>> > >>
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > Luciano Resende
>>> > > *http://people.apache.org/~lresende*
>>> <http://people.apache.org/~lresende>
>>> > > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
>>> > > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Luciano Resende
>>> > *http://people.apache.org/~lresende*
>>> <http://people.apache.org/~lresende>
>>> > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
>>> > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
>>> >
>>> --
>>> Mike Dusenberry
>>> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
>>> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release
Posted by Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>.
Regarding the documentation, if analytics_on in docs/_config.yml is set to
false when jekyll is run, then analytics is not added to the rendered HTML,
which would probably be a good idea for docs in a packaged release (if the
documentation site is packaged with the release).
Additionally, SYSTEMML_VERSION in docs/_config.yml sets the SystemML
version references in the rendered HTML, so it should be set to 0.9 when
docs are generated for a release.
Deron
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> If docs are included in the release distributions, it would be nice if
> they were the generated (mostly) HTML documentation in docs/_site after
> running jekyll. This would give users a complete set of documentation for
> the release. This includes the aforementioned Algorithms Reference pdf and
> all of the documentation currently available online.
>
> Deron
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Luciano,
>>
>> WRT docs, it would be nice to have a snapshot of the generated
>> documentation site (like http://apache.github.io/incubator-systemml/).
>> This allows a historical display of documentation similar to Spark (
>> http://spark.apache.org/documentation.html). If that is available
>> online, is it necessary to package the Algorithms Reference PDF or README
>> with the releases? Also, the docs/README.md describes generating the
>> documentation site from markdown using jekyll so I'm not sure if that would
>> help anyone if the *.md files aren't included in the release distributions.
>> Or is this a different README?
>>
>> Deron
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> great - thanks Niketan. From my perspective, we're also good to go.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>> [image: Inactive hide details for Niketan Pansare---01/15/2016 11:56:55
>>> AM---Hi all, As FYI, I ran some performance experiments this we]Niketan
>>> Pansare---01/15/2016 11:56:55 AM---Hi all, As FYI, I ran some performance
>>> experiments this week and the release
>>>
>>> From: Niketan Pansare/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
>>> Date: 01/15/2016 11:56 AM
>>> Subject: Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> As FYI, I ran some performance experiments this week and the release
>>> SystemML 0.9 looks good to me :)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Niketan Pansare
>>> IBM Almaden Research Center
>>> E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com
>>> *http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar*
>>> <http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar>
>>>
>>> Mike Dusenberry ---01/14/2016 06:49:31 PM---The DML Language Reference
>>> would be great to have as well. Also, in general, I think we should only
>>>
>>> From: Mike Dusenberry <du...@gmail.com>
>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
>>> Date: 01/14/2016 06:49 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The DML Language Reference would be great to have as well.
>>>
>>> Also, in general, I think we should only have the Javadocs for end-user
>>> facing code, such MLContext, rather than for any deep internals that a
>>> user
>>> is not going to interact with.
>>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 6:26 PM Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > What should be the minimum documentation to add to the release
>>> distribution
>>> > ?
>>> >
>>> > Currently we have :
>>> > docs/README.txt
>>> > docs/SysteML_Algorithms_Reference.pdf
>>> >
>>> > I was planning to add the javadocs as well.
>>> >
>>> > But I still think we have much more available in trunk that we could
>>> add...
>>> >
>>> > Suggestions are welcome...
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Luciano Resende <
>>> luckbr1975@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Also, for fixed jiras, I did the following query :
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> *https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-376?jql=project%20%3D%20SYSTEMML%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29%20AND%20created%20%3E%3D%202015-10-27*
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-376?jql=project%20%3D%20SYSTEMML%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29%20AND%20created%20%3E%3D%202015-10-27>
>>> > >
>>> > > And was wondering if we could all move this to 0.9 release.
>>> > >
>>> > > Could someone please help me verify.
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Luciano Resende <
>>> luckbr1975@gmail.com>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Matthias Boehm <mboehm@us.ibm.com
>>> >
>>> > >> wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >>> great - thanks everybody. Let's get these two fixes in and close
>>> the
>>> > >>> release. Until that point, please no new features. The version
>>> number
>>> > 0.9
>>> > >>> is fine with me since it's not really a pure maintenance release as
>>> > many
>>> > >>> new features went in too. Down the road, however, we need to think
>>> > about
>>> > >>> release branches.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >> We can create release branches now, or from the tag when we need a
>>> 0.9.1
>>> > >> for example. As we are not a large project with tens of prs coming
>>> very
>>> > >> quick, I would recommend to create the branch as needed for minor
>>> > releases.
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> --
>>> > >> Luciano Resende
>>> > >> *http://people.apache.org/~lresende*
>>> <http://people.apache.org/~lresende>
>>> > >> *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
>>> > >> *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
>>> > >>
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > Luciano Resende
>>> > > *http://people.apache.org/~lresende*
>>> <http://people.apache.org/~lresende>
>>> > > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
>>> > > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Luciano Resende
>>> > *http://people.apache.org/~lresende*
>>> <http://people.apache.org/~lresende>
>>> > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
>>> > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
>>> >
>>> --
>>> Mike Dusenberry
>>> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
>>> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release
Posted by Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>.
If docs are included in the release distributions, it would be nice if they
were the generated (mostly) HTML documentation in docs/_site after running
jekyll. This would give users a complete set of documentation for the
release. This includes the aforementioned Algorithms Reference pdf and all
of the documentation currently available online.
Deron
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Luciano,
>
> WRT docs, it would be nice to have a snapshot of the generated
> documentation site (like http://apache.github.io/incubator-systemml/).
> This allows a historical display of documentation similar to Spark (
> http://spark.apache.org/documentation.html). If that is available online,
> is it necessary to package the Algorithms Reference PDF or README with the
> releases? Also, the docs/README.md describes generating the documentation
> site from markdown using jekyll so I'm not sure if that would help anyone
> if the *.md files aren't included in the release distributions. Or is this
> a different README?
>
> Deron
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
>
>> great - thanks Niketan. From my perspective, we're also good to go.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Matthias
>>
>> [image: Inactive hide details for Niketan Pansare---01/15/2016 11:56:55
>> AM---Hi all, As FYI, I ran some performance experiments this we]Niketan
>> Pansare---01/15/2016 11:56:55 AM---Hi all, As FYI, I ran some performance
>> experiments this week and the release
>>
>> From: Niketan Pansare/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
>> Date: 01/15/2016 11:56 AM
>> Subject: Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release
>> ------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As FYI, I ran some performance experiments this week and the release
>> SystemML 0.9 looks good to me :)
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Niketan Pansare
>> IBM Almaden Research Center
>> E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com
>> *http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar*
>> <http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar>
>>
>> Mike Dusenberry ---01/14/2016 06:49:31 PM---The DML Language Reference
>> would be great to have as well. Also, in general, I think we should only
>>
>> From: Mike Dusenberry <du...@gmail.com>
>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
>> Date: 01/14/2016 06:49 PM
>> Subject: Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release
>> ------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> The DML Language Reference would be great to have as well.
>>
>> Also, in general, I think we should only have the Javadocs for end-user
>> facing code, such MLContext, rather than for any deep internals that a
>> user
>> is not going to interact with.
>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 6:26 PM Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > What should be the minimum documentation to add to the release
>> distribution
>> > ?
>> >
>> > Currently we have :
>> > docs/README.txt
>> > docs/SysteML_Algorithms_Reference.pdf
>> >
>> > I was planning to add the javadocs as well.
>> >
>> > But I still think we have much more available in trunk that we could
>> add...
>> >
>> > Suggestions are welcome...
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Also, for fixed jiras, I did the following query :
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> *https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-376?jql=project%20%3D%20SYSTEMML%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29%20AND%20created%20%3E%3D%202015-10-27*
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-376?jql=project%20%3D%20SYSTEMML%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29%20AND%20created%20%3E%3D%202015-10-27>
>> > >
>> > > And was wondering if we could all move this to 0.9 release.
>> > >
>> > > Could someone please help me verify.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Luciano Resende <
>> luckbr1975@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> great - thanks everybody. Let's get these two fixes in and close the
>> > >>> release. Until that point, please no new features. The version
>> number
>> > 0.9
>> > >>> is fine with me since it's not really a pure maintenance release as
>> > many
>> > >>> new features went in too. Down the road, however, we need to think
>> > about
>> > >>> release branches.
>> > >>>
>> > >> We can create release branches now, or from the tag when we need a
>> 0.9.1
>> > >> for example. As we are not a large project with tens of prs coming
>> very
>> > >> quick, I would recommend to create the branch as needed for minor
>> > releases.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> Luciano Resende
>> > >> *http://people.apache.org/~lresende*
>> <http://people.apache.org/~lresende>
>> > >> *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
>> > >> *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Luciano Resende
>> > > *http://people.apache.org/~lresende*
>> <http://people.apache.org/~lresende>
>> > > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
>> > > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Luciano Resende
>> > *http://people.apache.org/~lresende*
>> <http://people.apache.org/~lresende>
>> > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
>> > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
>> >
>> --
>> Mike Dusenberry
>> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
>> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release
Posted by Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>.
Hi Luciano,
WRT docs, it would be nice to have a snapshot of the generated
documentation site (like http://apache.github.io/incubator-systemml/). This
allows a historical display of documentation similar to Spark (
http://spark.apache.org/documentation.html). If that is available online,
is it necessary to package the Algorithms Reference PDF or README with the
releases? Also, the docs/README.md describes generating the documentation
site from markdown using jekyll so I'm not sure if that would help anyone
if the *.md files aren't included in the release distributions. Or is this
a different README?
Deron
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> great - thanks Niketan. From my perspective, we're also good to go.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Niketan Pansare---01/15/2016 11:56:55
> AM---Hi all, As FYI, I ran some performance experiments this we]Niketan
> Pansare---01/15/2016 11:56:55 AM---Hi all, As FYI, I ran some performance
> experiments this week and the release
>
> From: Niketan Pansare/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Date: 01/15/2016 11:56 AM
> Subject: Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> As FYI, I ran some performance experiments this week and the release
> SystemML 0.9 looks good to me :)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Niketan Pansare
> IBM Almaden Research Center
> E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com
> *http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar*
> <http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar>
>
> Mike Dusenberry ---01/14/2016 06:49:31 PM---The DML Language Reference
> would be great to have as well. Also, in general, I think we should only
>
> From: Mike Dusenberry <du...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Date: 01/14/2016 06:49 PM
> Subject: Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> The DML Language Reference would be great to have as well.
>
> Also, in general, I think we should only have the Javadocs for end-user
> facing code, such MLContext, rather than for any deep internals that a user
> is not going to interact with.
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 6:26 PM Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > What should be the minimum documentation to add to the release
> distribution
> > ?
> >
> > Currently we have :
> > docs/README.txt
> > docs/SysteML_Algorithms_Reference.pdf
> >
> > I was planning to add the javadocs as well.
> >
> > But I still think we have much more available in trunk that we could
> add...
> >
> > Suggestions are welcome...
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Also, for fixed jiras, I did the following query :
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> *https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-376?jql=project%20%3D%20SYSTEMML%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29%20AND%20created%20%3E%3D%202015-10-27*
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-376?jql=project%20%3D%20SYSTEMML%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29%20AND%20created%20%3E%3D%202015-10-27>
> > >
> > > And was wondering if we could all move this to 0.9 release.
> > >
> > > Could someone please help me verify.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Luciano Resende <
> luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> great - thanks everybody. Let's get these two fixes in and close the
> > >>> release. Until that point, please no new features. The version number
> > 0.9
> > >>> is fine with me since it's not really a pure maintenance release as
> > many
> > >>> new features went in too. Down the road, however, we need to think
> > about
> > >>> release branches.
> > >>>
> > >> We can create release branches now, or from the tag when we need a
> 0.9.1
> > >> for example. As we are not a large project with tens of prs coming
> very
> > >> quick, I would recommend to create the branch as needed for minor
> > releases.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Luciano Resende
> > >> *http://people.apache.org/~lresende*
> <http://people.apache.org/~lresende>
> > >> *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
> > >> *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Luciano Resende
> > > *http://people.apache.org/~lresende*
> <http://people.apache.org/~lresende>
> > > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
> > > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > *http://people.apache.org/~lresende*
> <http://people.apache.org/~lresende>
> > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
> > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
> >
> --
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
>
>
>
Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release
Posted by Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>.
great - thanks Niketan. From my perspective, we're also good to go.
Regards,
Matthias
From: Niketan Pansare/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 01/15/2016 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release
Hi all,
As FYI, I ran some performance experiments this week and the release
SystemML 0.9 looks good to me :)
Thanks,
Niketan Pansare
IBM Almaden Research Center
E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com
http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar
Mike Dusenberry ---01/14/2016 06:49:31 PM---The DML Language Reference
would be great to have as well. Also, in general, I think we should only
From: Mike Dusenberry <du...@gmail.com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 01/14/2016 06:49 PM
Subject: Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release
The DML Language Reference would be great to have as well.
Also, in general, I think we should only have the Javadocs for end-user
facing code, such MLContext, rather than for any deep internals that a user
is not going to interact with.
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 6:26 PM Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> What should be the minimum documentation to add to the release
distribution
> ?
>
> Currently we have :
> docs/README.txt
> docs/SysteML_Algorithms_Reference.pdf
>
> I was planning to add the javadocs as well.
>
> But I still think we have much more available in trunk that we could
add...
>
> Suggestions are welcome...
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Also, for fixed jiras, I did the following query :
> >
> >
> >
>
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-376?jql=project%20%3D%20SYSTEMML%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29%20AND%20created%20%3E%3D%202015-10-27
> >
> > And was wondering if we could all move this to 0.9 release.
> >
> > Could someone please help me verify.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Luciano Resende
<lu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> great - thanks everybody. Let's get these two fixes in and close the
> >>> release. Until that point, please no new features. The version number
> 0.9
> >>> is fine with me since it's not really a pure maintenance release as
> many
> >>> new features went in too. Down the road, however, we need to think
> about
> >>> release branches.
> >>>
> >> We can create release branches now, or from the tag when we need a
0.9.1
> >> for example. As we are not a large project with tens of prs coming
very
> >> quick, I would recommend to create the branch as needed for minor
> releases.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Luciano Resende
> >> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> >> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> >> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
--
Mike Dusenberry
GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
Sent from my iPhone.
Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release
Posted by Niketan Pansare <np...@us.ibm.com>.
Hi all,
As FYI, I ran some performance experiments this week and the release
SystemML 0.9 looks good to me :)
Thanks,
Niketan Pansare
IBM Almaden Research Center
E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com
http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar
From: Mike Dusenberry <du...@gmail.com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 01/14/2016 06:49 PM
Subject: Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release
The DML Language Reference would be great to have as well.
Also, in general, I think we should only have the Javadocs for end-user
facing code, such MLContext, rather than for any deep internals that a user
is not going to interact with.
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 6:26 PM Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> What should be the minimum documentation to add to the release
distribution
> ?
>
> Currently we have :
> docs/README.txt
> docs/SysteML_Algorithms_Reference.pdf
>
> I was planning to add the javadocs as well.
>
> But I still think we have much more available in trunk that we could
add...
>
> Suggestions are welcome...
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Also, for fixed jiras, I did the following query :
> >
> >
> >
>
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-376?jql=project%20%3D%20SYSTEMML%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29%20AND%20created%20%3E%3D%202015-10-27
> >
> > And was wondering if we could all move this to 0.9 release.
> >
> > Could someone please help me verify.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Luciano Resende
<lu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> great - thanks everybody. Let's get these two fixes in and close the
> >>> release. Until that point, please no new features. The version number
> 0.9
> >>> is fine with me since it's not really a pure maintenance release as
> many
> >>> new features went in too. Down the road, however, we need to think
> about
> >>> release branches.
> >>>
> >> We can create release branches now, or from the tag when we need a
0.9.1
> >> for example. As we are not a large project with tens of prs coming
very
> >> quick, I would recommend to create the branch as needed for minor
> releases.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Luciano Resende
> >> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> >> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> >> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
--
Mike Dusenberry
GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
Sent from my iPhone.
Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release
Posted by Mike Dusenberry <du...@gmail.com>.
The DML Language Reference would be great to have as well.
Also, in general, I think we should only have the Javadocs for end-user
facing code, such MLContext, rather than for any deep internals that a user
is not going to interact with.
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 6:26 PM Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> What should be the minimum documentation to add to the release distribution
> ?
>
> Currently we have :
> docs/README.txt
> docs/SysteML_Algorithms_Reference.pdf
>
> I was planning to add the javadocs as well.
>
> But I still think we have much more available in trunk that we could add...
>
> Suggestions are welcome...
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Also, for fixed jiras, I did the following query :
> >
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-376?jql=project%20%3D%20SYSTEMML%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29%20AND%20created%20%3E%3D%202015-10-27
> >
> > And was wondering if we could all move this to 0.9 release.
> >
> > Could someone please help me verify.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> great - thanks everybody. Let's get these two fixes in and close the
> >>> release. Until that point, please no new features. The version number
> 0.9
> >>> is fine with me since it's not really a pure maintenance release as
> many
> >>> new features went in too. Down the road, however, we need to think
> about
> >>> release branches.
> >>>
> >> We can create release branches now, or from the tag when we need a 0.9.1
> >> for example. As we are not a large project with tens of prs coming very
> >> quick, I would recommend to create the branch as needed for minor
> releases.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Luciano Resende
> >> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> >> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> >> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
--
Mike Dusenberry
GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
Sent from my iPhone.
Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
What should be the minimum documentation to add to the release distribution
?
Currently we have :
docs/README.txt
docs/SysteML_Algorithms_Reference.pdf
I was planning to add the javadocs as well.
But I still think we have much more available in trunk that we could add...
Suggestions are welcome...
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Also, for fixed jiras, I did the following query :
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-376?jql=project%20%3D%20SYSTEMML%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29%20AND%20created%20%3E%3D%202015-10-27
>
> And was wondering if we could all move this to 0.9 release.
>
> Could someone please help me verify.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> great - thanks everybody. Let's get these two fixes in and close the
>>> release. Until that point, please no new features. The version number 0.9
>>> is fine with me since it's not really a pure maintenance release as many
>>> new features went in too. Down the road, however, we need to think about
>>> release branches.
>>>
>> We can create release branches now, or from the tag when we need a 0.9.1
>> for example. As we are not a large project with tens of prs coming very
>> quick, I would recommend to create the branch as needed for minor releases.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Luciano Resende
>> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
Also, for fixed jiras, I did the following query :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-376?jql=project%20%3D%20SYSTEMML%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29%20AND%20created%20%3E%3D%202015-10-27
And was wondering if we could all move this to 0.9 release.
Could someone please help me verify.
Thanks
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
>
>> great - thanks everybody. Let's get these two fixes in and close the
>> release. Until that point, please no new features. The version number 0.9
>> is fine with me since it's not really a pure maintenance release as many
>> new features went in too. Down the road, however, we need to think about
>> release branches.
>>
> We can create release branches now, or from the tag when we need a 0.9.1
> for example. As we are not a large project with tens of prs coming very
> quick, I would recommend to create the branch as needed for minor releases.
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> great - thanks everybody. Let's get these two fixes in and close the
> release. Until that point, please no new features. The version number 0.9
> is fine with me since it's not really a pure maintenance release as many
> new features went in too. Down the road, however, we need to think about
> release branches.
>
We can create release branches now, or from the tag when we need a 0.9.1
for example. As we are not a large project with tens of prs coming very
quick, I would recommend to create the branch as needed for minor releases.
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release
Posted by Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>.
great - thanks everybody. Let's get these two fixes in and close the
release. Until that point, please no new features. The version number 0.9
is fine with me since it's not really a pure maintenance release as many
new features went in too. Down the road, however, we need to think about
release branches.
Regards,
Matthias
From: Mike Dusenberry <du...@gmail.com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 01/11/2016 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release
Hi Luciano,
I'd like to commit SYSTEMML-217, which should be done today, as part of the
0.9 release.
- Mike
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:35 AM Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Luciano,
>
> In the JIRA comments, Matthias asked yesterday if I could commit a fix
for
> SYSTEMML-330 before the release. I am looking at it now. Since it needs
to
> be coded and tested, I probably don't think I would be ready today.
Perhaps
> a Tuesday or Wednesday release might allow some updates like this?
>
> Also, any reason for 0.9 instead of 0.8.1?
>
> Deron
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I would like to volunteer as RM for the next SystemML release, which I
> > propose we call it 0.9.
> >
> >
> > I was planning to start the process later today, unless there is any
> > blocking issue that folks are working on and would like to get it in
> before
> > the release.
> >
> > Let's use this thread to coordinate any issues needed for the release.
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
>
--
Mike Dusenberry
GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
Sent from my iPhone
Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release
Posted by Mike Dusenberry <du...@gmail.com>.
Hi Luciano,
I'd like to commit SYSTEMML-217, which should be done today, as part of the
0.9 release.
- Mike
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:35 AM Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Luciano,
>
> In the JIRA comments, Matthias asked yesterday if I could commit a fix for
> SYSTEMML-330 before the release. I am looking at it now. Since it needs to
> be coded and tested, I probably don't think I would be ready today. Perhaps
> a Tuesday or Wednesday release might allow some updates like this?
>
> Also, any reason for 0.9 instead of 0.8.1?
>
> Deron
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I would like to volunteer as RM for the next SystemML release, which I
> > propose we call it 0.9.
> >
> >
> > I was planning to start the process later today, unless there is any
> > blocking issue that folks are working on and would like to get it in
> before
> > the release.
> >
> > Let's use this thread to coordinate any issues needed for the release.
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
>
--
Mike Dusenberry
GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
Sent from my iPhone
Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release
Posted by Deron Eriksson <de...@gmail.com>.
Hi Luciano,
In the JIRA comments, Matthias asked yesterday if I could commit a fix for
SYSTEMML-330 before the release. I am looking at it now. Since it needs to
be coded and tested, I probably don't think I would be ready today. Perhaps
a Tuesday or Wednesday release might allow some updates like this?
Also, any reason for 0.9 instead of 0.8.1?
Deron
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I would like to volunteer as RM for the next SystemML release, which I
> propose we call it 0.9.
>
>
> I was planning to start the process later today, unless there is any
> blocking issue that folks are working on and would like to get it in before
> the release.
>
> Let's use this thread to coordinate any issues needed for the release.
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>