You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org on 2007/05/07 12:53:19 UTC
[Bug 5450] New: check_rbl_sub(dnswl...) exit, but check_rbl(dnswl...) is missing
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5450
Summary: check_rbl_sub(dnswl...) exit, but check_rbl(dnswl...) is
missing
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.2.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Rules (Eval Tests)
AssignedTo: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
ReportedBy: matthias@leisi.net
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_* rules exist in 72_active.cf with eval:check_rbl_sub, but no
corresponding eval:check_rbl is found. To fix the missing check_rbl, add
header __RCVD_IN_DNSWL eval:check_rbl('dnswl-firsttrusted', 'list.dnswl.org.')
to an existing rules file, possibly 20_dnsbl_tests.cf.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 5450] check_rbl_sub(dnswl...) exists, but check_rbl(dnswl...) is missing
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5450
jm@jmason.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|Undefined |3.2.1
------- Additional Comments From jm@jmason.org 2007-05-07 04:02 -------
oops :(
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 5450] [review] __RCVD_IN_DNSWL was left out of 3.2.0
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5450
spamassassin@dostech.ca changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From spamassassin@dostech.ca 2007-06-20 10:52 -------
[dos@cyan 3.2]$ svn ci -m "bug 5450: add __RCVD_IN_DNSWL to 72_active.cf"
Sending rules/active.list
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 549171.
[dos@cyan 3.2]$
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 5450] __RCVD_IN_DNSWL was left out of 3.2.0
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5450
sidney@sidney.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From sidney@sidney.com 2007-06-04 22:09 -------
This appears to have been fixed and not closed. I see __RCVD_IN_DNSWL in
70_sandbox.cf. If that isn't a good enough place please reopen this, move it,
and close this again.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 5450] [review] __RCVD_IN_DNSWL was left out of 3.2.0
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5450
------- Additional Comments From felicity@apache.org 2007-06-20 07:26 -------
imo it's trivial, just commit it.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 5450] check_rbl_sub(dnswl...) exists, but check_rbl(dnswl...) is missing
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5450
matthias@leisi.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|check_rbl_sub(dnswl...) |check_rbl_sub(dnswl...)
|exit, but |exists, but
|check_rbl(dnswl...) is |check_rbl(dnswl...) is
|missing |missing
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 5450] [review] __RCVD_IN_DNSWL was left out of 3.2.0
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5450
jm@jmason.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status Whiteboard|needs 2 votes |needs 1
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 5450] __RCVD_IN_DNSWL was left out of 3.2.0
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5450
jm@jmason.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|check_rbl_sub(dnswl...) |__RCVD_IN_DNSWL was left out
|exists, but |of 3.2.0
|check_rbl(dnswl...) is |
|missing |
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 5450] __RCVD_IN_DNSWL was left out of 3.2.0
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5450
------- Additional Comments From spamassassin@dostech.ca 2007-06-17 23:03 -------
Created an attachment (id=3995)
--> (http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=3995&action=view)
patch to fix 3.2 active list
I also:
- added tflags net to the rule in the sandbox
- added the rule to 72_active.cf in the 3.2 branch updates
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 5450] [review] __RCVD_IN_DNSWL was left out of 3.2.0
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5450
sidney@sidney.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |ASSIGNED
Status Whiteboard|needs 1 |go
------- Additional Comments From sidney@sidney.com 2007-06-20 10:25 -------
+1, in case you want to see a vote anyway.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 5450] __RCVD_IN_DNSWL was left out of 3.2.0
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5450
spamassassin@dostech.ca changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |
Target Milestone|3.2.1 |3.2.2
------- Additional Comments From spamassassin@dostech.ca 2007-06-04 23:40 -------
70_sandbox.cf isn't distributed in release rulesets or sa-update rulesets.
Reopening.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 5450] [review] __RCVD_IN_DNSWL was left out of 3.2.0
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5450
------- Additional Comments From jm@jmason.org 2007-06-18 09:31 -------
+1
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 5450] __RCVD_IN_DNSWL was left out of 3.2.0
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5450
------- Additional Comments From matthias@leisi.net 2007-06-04 23:23 -------
I haven't fully understood the rule "lifecycle" yet, so please forgive if this
is a stupid question: Will the __RCVD_IN_DNSWL end up in the distribution
tarball if it is in 70_sandbox.cf?
If yes, closing the bug is fine with me.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 5450] [review] __RCVD_IN_DNSWL was left out of 3.2.0
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5450
spamassassin@dostech.ca changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|__RCVD_IN_DNSWL was left out|[review] __RCVD_IN_DNSWL was
|of 3.2.0 |left out of 3.2.0
Status Whiteboard| |needs 2 votes
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.